Comparison of methods for detecting biofilm syndrome in bacterial vaginosis

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат ақылы немесе тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

In bacterial vaginosis, Gardnerella vaginalis and Fannyhessea vaginae form highly structured, dense biofilm consortia. Key cells serve as markers of biofilm organization within bacterial communities.

Objective: To compare microbiological methods for detecting biofilm syndrome in bacterial vaginosis.

Materials and methods: Twenty-eight women with complaints of vaginal discharge were examined. Vaginal discharge was used as the clinical material. Microscopy of preparations stained with Gram and methylene blue, as well as fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) or the RiGinaM method, were used. The Femoflor test was used for molecular analysis.

Results: The diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in the Nugent study was established in 89.3% (25/28) of women. The microscopic evaluation of vaginal microbiocenosis using aniline dyes and the RiGinaM method yielded identical results (L:E ratio less than 4:1, with clue cells detected). Clue cells were not identified by any of the methods in only three cases. Among the 25 patients diagnosed with bacterial vaginosis by the Femoflor test, G. vaginalis was detected in all clinical samples, with an average logarithmic value of 7.55, whereas F. vaginae was detected in 22 cases. In three instances of physiological vaginal microbiocenosis, the total bacterial mass was predominantly represented by lactobacilli. G. vaginalis was found among these women, but their total bacterial mass was low (3.6, 4.1, and 6.8 lg), and F. vaginae was detected in only one case (2.1 lg).

Conclusion: Clue cells, as markers of biofilm bacterial vaginosis, can be detected using Gram staining, methylene blue staining, and the RiGinaM method. Microscopic methods using aniline dyes do not differentiate the types of bacteria present in the clue cells, whereas the RiGinaM method requires specific probes to identify microorganisms. The multiplex PCR method in real time can be utilized for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in conjunction with microscopy methods.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

K. Shalepo

D.O. Ott Research Institute for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: 2474151@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3002-3874

PhD, Senior Researcher at the Experimental Microbiology Group

Ресей, St. Petersburg

E. Spasibova

D.O. Ott Research Institute for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology

Email: elena.graciosae@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-6070-4651

Bacteriologist at the Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology

Ресей, St. Petersburg

A. Krysanova

D.O. Ott Research Institute for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology

Email: krusanova.anna@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4798-1881

PhD, Senior Researcher at the Experimental Microbiology Group

Ресей, St. Petersburg

T. Khusnutdinova

D.O. Ott Research Institute for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology

Email: husnutdinovat@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2742-2655

PhD, Senior Researcher at the Experimental Microbiology Group

Ресей, St. Petersburg

O. Budilovskaya

D.O. Ott Research Institute for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology

Email: o.budilovskaya@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7673-6274

PhD, Senior Researcher at the Experimental Microbiology Group

Ресей, St. Petersburg

K. Storozheva

D.O. Ott Research Institute for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology

Email: kvstorozheva@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-8954-0234

PhD Student

Ресей, St. Petersburg

N. Tapilskaya

D.O. Ott Research Institute for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology

Email: tapnatalia@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5309-0087

Dr. Med. Sci., Professor, Leading Researcher at the Reproduction Department

Ресей, St. Petersburg

A. Savicheva

D.O. Ott Research Institute for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology

Email: savitcheva@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3870-5930

Dr. Med. Sci., Professor, Head of the Department of Medical Microbiology

Ресей, St. Petersburg

I. Kogan

D.O. Ott Research Institute for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology

Email: ovr@ott.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7351-6900

Corresponding Member of the RAS, Dr. Med. Sci., Professor, Director

Ресей, St. Petersburg

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Peebles K., Velloza J., Balkus J.E., McClelland R.S., Barnabas R.V. High global burden and costs of bacterial vaginosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2019; 46(5): 304-11. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000972
  2. Muzny C.A., Balkus J., Mitchell C., Sobel J.D., Workowski K., Marrazzo J. et al. Diagnosis and management of bacterial vaginosis: summary of evidence reviewed for the 2021 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2022; 74(Suppl. 2): S144-51. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac021
  3. Yudin M.H., Money D.M. No. 211 – Screening and management of bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2017; 39(8): e184-91. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2017.04.018
  4. Workowski K.A., Bolan G.A.; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recomm. Rep. 2015; 64(RR-03): 1-137.
  5. Ison C.A., Hay P.E. Validation of a simplified grading of Gram stained vaginal smears for use in genitourinary medicine clinics. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2002; 78(6): 413-5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sti.78.6.413
  6. Coleman J.S., Gaydos C.A. Molecular diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis: an update. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2018; 56(9): e00342-18. https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00342-18
  7. Swidsinski A., Mendling W., Loening-Baucke V., Ladhoff A., Swidsinski S., Hale L.P. et al. Adherent biofilms in bacterial vaginosis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005; 106(5 Pt 1): 1013-23. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ 01.aog.0000183594.45524.d2
  8. Hardy L., Jespers V., Dahchour N., Mwambarangwe L., Musengamana V., Vaneechoutte M. et al. Unravelling the bacterial vaginosis-associated biofilm: a multiplex Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae fluorescence in situ hybridization assay using peptide nucleic acid probes. PLOS One. 2015; 10(8): e0136658. https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136658
  9. Abou Chacra L., Fenollar F., Diop K. Bacterial vaginosis: what do we currently know? Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022; 11: 672429. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.672429
  10. Gardner H.L., Dukes C.D. Haemophilus vaginalis vaginitis: a newly defined specific infection previously classified non-specific vaginitis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1955; 69(5): 962-76. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ 0002-9378(55)90095-8
  11. Vaneechoutte M., Guschin A., Van Simaey L., Gansemans Y., Van Nieuwerburgh F., Cools P. Emended description Gardnerella vaginalis and description Gardnerella leopoldii sp. nov., Gardnerella piotii sp. nov. and Gardnerella swidsinskii sp. nov., with delineation of 13 genomic species within the genus Gardnerella. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2019; 69(3): 679-87. https://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.003200
  12. Крысанова А.А., Гущин А.Е., Савичева А.М. Значение определения генотипов Gardnerella vaginalis в диагностике рецидивирующего бактериального вагиноза. Медицинский алфавит. 2021; 30: 48-52. [Krysanova A.A., Gushchin A.E., Savicheva A.M. The importance of determining Gardnerella vaginalis genotypes in the diagnosis of recurrent bacterial vaginosis. Medical Alphabet. 2021; 30: 48-52 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.33667/ 2078-5631-2021-30-48-52
  13. Swidsinski A., Doerffel Y., Loening-Baucke V., Swidsinski S., Verstraelen H., Vaneechoutte M. et al. Gardnerella biofilm involves females and males and is transmitted sexually. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 2010; 70(4): 256-63. https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000314015
  14. Swidsinski A., Loening-Baucke V., Swidsinski S., Sobel J.D., Dörffel Y., Guschin A. Clue cells and pseudo clue cells in different morphotypes of bacterial vaginosis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022; 12: 905739. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.905739
  15. Swidsinski A., Amann R., Guschin A., Swidsinski S., Loening-Baucke V., Mendling W. et al. Polymicrobial consortia in the pathogenesis of biofilm vaginosis visualized by FISH. Historic review outlining the basic principles of the polymicrobial infection theory. Microbes Infect. 2024; 26(8): 105403. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2024.105403
  16. Oliveira R., Almeida C., Azevedo N.F. Detection of microorganisms by fluorescence in situ hybridization using peptide nucleic acid. Methods Mol. Biol. 2020; 2105: 217-30. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ 978-1-0716-0243-0_13
  17. Савичева А.М. Современные представления о лабораторной диагностике репродуктивно значимых инфекций у женщин репродуктивного возраста. Мнение эксперта. Вопросы практической кольпоскопии. Генитальные инфекции. 2022; (3): 34-9. [Savicheva A.M. Modern ideas about the laboratory diagnosis of reproductively significant infections in women of reproductive age. Expert opinion. Issues of Practical Colposcopy & Genital Infections. 2022; 3: 34-9 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.46393/27826392_2022_3_34
  18. Савичева А.М., Крысанова А.А., Шалепо К.В., Спасибова Е.В., Будиловская О.В., Хуснутдинова Т.А., Тапильская Н.И., Коган И.Ю., Свидзинский А.В., Свидзинская С. Применение метода флуоресцентной гибридизации in situ в диагностике бактериального вагиноза. Акушерство и гинекология. 2023; 12: 68-77. [Savicheva A.M., Krysanova A.A., Shalepo K.V., Spasibova E.V., Budilovskaya O.V., Khusnutdinova T.A., Tapilskaya N.I., Kogan I.Yu., Swidsinski A.V., Swidsinski S. Application of fluorescent in situ hybridization in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2023; (12): 68-77 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2023.129
  19. Randjelovic I., Moghaddam A., Freiesleben de Blasio B., Moi H. The role of polymorphonuclear leukocyte counts from urethra, cervix, and vaginal wet mount in diagnosis of nongonococcal lower genital tract infection. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018; 2018: 8236575. https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8236575
  20. Кира Е.Ф. Бактериальный вагиноз. М.: МИА; 2012. 470 c. [Kira E.F. Bacterial vaginosis. Moscow: MIA; 2012. 470 p. (in Russian)].
  21. Amsel R., Totten P.A., Spiegel C.A., Chen K.C., Eschenbach D., Holmes K.K. Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am. J. Med. 1983; 74(1): 14-22. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ 0002-9343(83)91112-9
  22. Nugent R.P., Krohn M.A., Hillier S.L. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1991; 29(2): 297-301. https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/ jcm.29.2.297-301.1991

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Patient D., vaginal discharge: light microscopy, stratified squamous epithelium, superficial epithelial cells, L:E less than 1:1, lactobacilli morphotype prevails. Left - Gram stain, ×1000, center - methylene blue stain, ×1000, right - fluorescence microscopy, mets RiGinaM Cy3 EUB 338; Lactobacillus crispatus, x1000

Жүктеу (717KB)
3. Fig. 2. Patient K., vaginal discharge: light microscopy, stratified squamous epithelium, superficial epithelial cells, L:E less than 1:1, “clue cells”, Left – Gram stain, ×1000; Center – methylene blue stain, ×1000; Right – fluorescence microscopy, RiGinM Cy3 EUB 338 method; Gardnerella vaginalis, ×1000

Жүктеу (716KB)
4. Fig. 3. Patient M., vaginal discharge: light microscopy, stratified squamous epithelium, superficial epithelial cells, L:E less than 1:1, “clue cells”. Left: Gram stain, ×1000; center: methylene blue stain, ×1000; right: fluorescence microscopy, RiGinM method: Cy5 gard stain, red fluorescence, Gardnerella vaginalis; Cy3 ato stain, yellow fluorescence, Atopobium vaginac (Fannyhesea vaginae), ×600

Жүктеу (726KB)

© Bionika Media, 2025