CURRENT TREATMENT POLICY IN PATIENTS WITH VARYING SEVERITY OF PREECLAMPSIA


Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

Objective. To evaluate the efficiency of therapy for mild and moderate gestosis on the basis of the clinical course and changes in the concentrations of markers of endothelial dysfunction. Subjects and methods. The concentrations of the markers of endothelial dysfunction, such as VEGF, TNF-a, VCAM, ICAM, and, NSE, in varying severity of preeclampsia (PE) were studied in 80 pregnant women (a study group) and 20 healthy pregnant ones (a control group) in the third trimester. The study group included 65 women with moderate PE (blood samples were taken on admission to hospital and 7-10 days after start of therapy) and 15 women with severe PE (blood samples were taken before and after delivery). Results. As compared with the healthy pregnant women, the study group showed a progressive reduction in the concentrations of VEGF, a rise in the levels of TNF-a, VCAM, ICAM, and NSE with the higher severity of PE. During treatment for moderate PE, there was a significant increase in the concentrations of VEGF and a slight fall of the levels of TNF-a, VCAM, ICAM, and NSE. Therapy for severe PE was ineffective. Conclusion. In moderate PE, pregnancy may be prolonged using combination infusion therapy for at least 2—5 times a week. This policy enables perinatal outcomes to be improved. Treatment for severe preeclampsia is ineffective and requires preterm delivery in any period of pregnancy.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

I. SIDOROVA

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

N. ZARUBENKO

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: natasha.z77@mail.ru

O. GURINA

V.P. Serbsky State Research Center of Social and Forensic Psychiatry, Russian Agency for Health Care

Bibliografia

  1. Айламазян Э.К., Мозговая Е.В. Гестоз: теория и практика. — М.: Медпресс-информ, 2008.
  2. Галинова И.Л. Клинико-иммунохимическая оценка нарушений проницаемости гематоэнцефалического барьера у беременных с гестозом: Автореф. дис.. канд. мед. наук. — М., 2007.
  3. Никитина Н.А. Оценка степени тяжести гестоза: Автореф. дис.. канд. мед. наук. — М., 2005.
  4. Петрищев Н.Н. Дисфункция эндотелия. Причины, механизмы, фармакологическая коррекция. — СПб.: Изд-во СПбГМУ, 2003.
  5. Савельева Г.М., Курцер М.А., Шалина Р.И. Материнская смертность и пути ее снижения // Акуш. и гин. — 2009. — № 3. — С. 11—15.
  6. Сидорова И.С. Гестоз: Учебное пособие. — М.: Медицина, 2003.
  7. Стрижаков А.Н., Давыдов А.И., Мусаев З.М. Гестоз: диагностика, акушерская тактика и интенсивная терапия. — М.: Информед, 2007.
  8. Суханова Л., Юсупова А.Н., Глушенкова В.А. Клиникостатистический анализ современных тенденций материнской смертности в России // Здравоохр. РФ. — 2009. — № 4. — С.14—19.
  9. Сухих Г.Т., Мурашко Л.Е. Преэклампсия. — М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2010.
  10. Филиппов О.С., Гусева Е.В., Фролова О.Г. Итоги мониторинга материнской смертности в Российской Федерации в 2006 г. // Рос. вестн. акуш.-гин. — 2008. — № 2. — С 9—12.
  11. Шеманаева Т.В. Клинико-диагностическое и практическое значение маркеров эндотелиоза при гестозе: Автореф. дис.. канд. мед. наук. — М., 2008.
  12. Davison J.M., Homuth V., Jeyabalan A. et al. New aspects in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia // J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. — 2004. — Vol. 15. — P. 2440—2448.
  13. Kim S.Y., Ryu H.M., Yang J.H. et. al. Maternal serum levels of VCAM-1, ICAM-1 and E-selectin in preeclampsia // J. Korean Med. Sci. — 2004. — Vol. 19, № 5. — Р. 688—692.
  14. Krauss T., Emons G., Augustin H.G. Predictive value of routine circulating soluble endothelial cell adhesion molecule measurements during pregnancy // Clin. Chem. — 2002. — Vol. 48, № 9. — P. 1418—1425.
  15. La Marca B.D., Ryan M.J., Gilbert J.S. et. al. Serum pro-inflammatory cytokines in physiological and preeclamptic pregnancies // Curr. Hypertens. Rep. — 2007. — Vol. 9, № 6. — P. 480—485.
  16. Mutter W.P., Karumanchi S.A. Molecular mechanisms of preeclampsia // Microvasc. Res. — 2008. — Vol. 75, № 1. — Р. 1—8.
  17. Sharma J.B., Sharma A., Bahadur A. et al. Oxidative stress markers and antioxidant levels in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia // Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. — 2006. — Vol. 94, № 1. — Р. 23—27.
  18. Smith G.C., Wear H. The perinatal implications of angiogenic factors // Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. — 2009. — Vol. 21, № 2. — P. 111—116.
  19. Zhihe Li., Ying Zhang., Jing Ying Ma et. al. Recombinant vascular endothelial growth factor 121 attenuates hypertension and improves kidney damade in a rat model of preeclampsia // J. Hypertension. — 2007. — Vol. 50. — P. 686—692.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Declaração de direitos autorais © Bionika Media, 2011

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies