PROBABILITY OF NEOPLASTIC TRANSFORMATION IN DIFFERENT TYPES OF ENDOMETRIAL HYPERPLASIA


Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

Objective. To determine the probability of malignization of different types of endometrial hyperplasia, by using the most informative indicators of expression of the mRNA genes presumably involved in the development of hyperand neoplastic endometrial processes. Subject and methods. Clinical and laboratory examinations involving endometrial tissue sampling were made in 111 women. A study group included 58 patients with endometrial hyperplasia (31, 15, and 12 with simple, complex, and atypical hyperplasia, respectively); a comparison group consisted of 16 patients with low-grade endometrioid adenocarcinoma; a control group comprised 47 women with the morphologically unaltered endometrium in the stage of proliferation (n = 26) or secretion (n = 21). RT-PCR was used to study mRNA in 19 genes regulating the cell cycle, proliferation, apoptosis, invasion, cell receptor phenotype (PTEN, MKI67 (KI67), CCNB1, BIRC5, AURKA, MYBL2, CDKN2A (p16), NDRG1, BCL2, BAX, BAG1, CTSL2, MMP11, ESR1, PGR, CD68, PTGS2 (COX2), CYP19A1, and SCUBE2). Results. A statistical model including the expression levels in 5 genes, such as PTEN, PGR, NDRG1, CTSL2, and SCUBE2, was built to create an integral criterion for the probability of endometrioid adenocarcinoma by binary logistic regression. The area under the ROC curve was 0.984±0.16 (p < 0.0001). The application of the developed model could classify correctly 93.8% of the morphologically verified endometrioid adenocarcinoma samples; 19, 20, and 42% of the simple, complex, and atypical endometrial hyperplasia samples were referred to as an area to be at high risk for neoplastic transformation of the endometrium. Conclusion. By using the mathematical criteria, the investigators identified 5 most significant genes out of 19 ones under study. These included PTEN, PGR, NDRG1, CTSL2, and SCUBE2 and were used to propose a statistical model as a linear equation that offered a means of objectively identifying a group of patients who were presumably at higher risk of cancer. They deserve special attention, diagnostic monitoring, risk factor modifications, long-term adequate hormone therapy or surgical treatment.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

M. DUMANOVSKAYA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: m_dumanovskaya@oparina4.ru

G. CHERNUKHA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: g_chernukha@oparina4.ru

O. BURMENSKAYA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: o_bourmenskaya@oparina4.ru

A. DONNIKOV

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: a_ donnikov@oparina.ru

D. TROFIMOV

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: d_troflmov@oparina4.ru

Bibliografia

  1. Давыдов М.И., Аксель Е.М. Заболеваемость злокачественными новообразованиями населения России и стран СНГ. Вестник РОНЦ им. Н.Н. Блохина РАМН. 2010; 21(2, прил. 1). 158с.
  2. Howlader N., Noone A.M., Krapcho M., Garshell J., Neyman N., Altekruse S.F., eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975 2010, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD. http://seer. cancer.gov/csr/1975_2010/, based on November 2012 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, 2013.
  3. rbo A., Arnes M., Hancke C., Vereide A.B., Pettersen I., Larsen K. Treatment results of endometrial hyperplasia after prospective D-score classification A follow-up study comparing effect of LNG-IUD and oral progestins versus observation only. Gynecol. Oncol. 2008; 111: 68—73.
  4. Reed S.D., Voigt L.F., Newton K.M., Garcia R., Allison H.K., Epplein M. Progestin therapy of complex endometrial hyperplasia with and without atypia. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009; 113(3): 655—62.
  5. Allison K.H., Tenpenny E., Reed S.D., Swisher E.M., Garica R.L. Immunohistochemical markers in endometrial hyperplasia: Is there a panel with promise? A review. Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol. 2008; 16(4): 329—43.
  6. Steinbakk A., Gudlaugsson E., Aasprong O.G., Skaland I., Malpica A., Feng W. et al. Molecular biomarkers in endometrial hyperplasias predict cancer progression. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011; 204(4): 357; e1—12.
  7. Lacey J. V.Jr., Chia V.M. Endometrial hyperplasia and the risk of progression to carcinoma. Maturitas. 2009; 63: 39—44.
  8. Silverberg S.G., Kurman R.J., Nogales F., Mutter G.L., Kubik-Huch R.A., Tavassoli F.A. Tumors of the uterine corpus. Epithelial tumors and related lesions. In: Tavassoli F.A., Deville P., eds. WHO-classification of tumors. Pathology and genetics of tumors of the breast and female genital organs. Lyon: IARC Press; 2003: 221—32.
  9. Upson K., Allison K.H., Reed S.D., Jordan C.D., Newton K.M., Swisher E.M. et al. Biomarkers of progestin therapy resistance and endometrial hyperplasia progression. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012; 207(1): 36; e1—8.
  10. Власов Р.С. Клиническое значение метилирования генов-супрессоров опухолевого роста при патологических процессах эндометрия у женщин репродуктивного возраста: Автореф. дис.. канд. мед. наук. М.; 2011: 21—2.
  11. Stein S., Thomas E.K., Herzog B., Westfall M.D., Rocheleau J.V., Jackson R.S. 2nd. et al. NDRG1 is necessary for p53-dependent apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2004; 279; 47(19): 48930—40.
  12. Lv X.H., Chen J.W., Zhao G., Feng Z.Z., Yang D.H., Sun W.W. et al. N-myc downstream-regulated gene 1/Cap43 may function as tumor suppressor in endometrial cancer. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2012; 138(10): 1703—15.
  13. Lin Y.C., Chen C.C., Cheng C.J., Yang R.B. Domain and functional analysis of a novel breast tumor suppressor protein, SCUBE2. J. Biol. Chem. 2011; 286(30): 27039—47.
  14. Cheng C.J., Lin Y.C., Tsai M.T., Chen C.S., Hsieh M.C., Chen C.L., Yang R.B. SCUBE2 suppresses breast tumor cell proliferation and confers a favorable prognosis in invasive breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2009; 69(8): 3634—41.
  15. Ghabreau L., Roux J.P., Niveleau A., Fontanière B., Mahe C., Mokni M., Frappart L. Correlation between the DNA global methylation status and progesterone receptor expression in normal endometrium, endometrioid adenocarcinoma and precursors. Virchows Arch. 2004; 445(2): 129—34.
  16. Nunobiki O., Taniguchi E., Ishii A., Tang W., Utsunomiya H., Nakamura Y. et al. Significance of hormone receptor status and tumor vessels in normal, hyperplastic and neoplastic endometrium. Pathol. Int. 2003; 53(12): 846—52.
  17. Baak J.P., Van Diermen B., Steinbakk A., Janssen E., Skaland I., Mutter G.L. et al. Lack of PTEN expression in endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia is correlated with cancer progression. Hum. Pathol. 2005; 36(5): 555—61.
  18. Mutter G.L., Lin M.C., Fitzgerald J.T., Kum J.B., Baak J.P., Lees J.A. et al. Altered PTEN expression as a diagnostic marker for the earliest endometrial precancers. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2000; 92(11): 924—30.
  19. Kimura F., Watanabe J., Hata H., Fujisawa T., Kamata Y., Nishimura Y. et al. PTEN immunohistochemical expression is suppressed in G1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterine corpus. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2004; 130(3): 161—8.
  20. Levicar N., Dewey R.A., Daley E., Bates T.E., Davies D., Kos J. et al. Selective suppression of cathepsin L by antisense cDNA impairs human brain tumor cell invasion in vitro and promotes apoptosis. Cancer Gene Ther. 2003; 10: 141—51.
  21. Gocheva V., Zeng W., Ke D., Klimstra D., Reinheckel T., Peters C. et al. Distinct roles for cysteine cathepsin genes in multistage tumorigenesis. Genes Dev. 2006; 20: 543—56.
  22. Gocheva V., Joyce J.A. Cysteine cathepsins and the cutting edge of cancer invasion. Cell Cycle. 2007; 6(1): 60—4.
  23. Lankelma J.M., Voorend D.M., Barwari T., Koetsveld J., Van der Spek A.H., De Porto A.P. et al. Cathepsin L, target in cancer treatment? Life Sci. 2010; 86: 225—33.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Declaração de direitos autorais © Bionika Media, 2013

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies