Complications of diagnostic and operative hysteroscopy


Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

Objective. To improve methods to prevent hysteroscopic complications (HC) in different types of intrauterine pathology (IP), by scientifically substantiating the rational tactics of hysteroscopic interventions having regard to the acceptability, efficiency, and safety of different technological variants. Subject and methods. A longitudinal observational retrospective case-control study was conducted at the S.P. Botkin City Clinical Hospital. The course of interventions and the development of HC were analyzed examining the case histories of 3570 women aged 19 to 85 years with IP, including 3290 (92.2%) inpatients and 280 (7.8%) outpatients who underwent hysteroscopy in the prehospital stage in January 2010 to January 2012. The indications for hysteroscopy were suspected IP evidenced by small pelvic ultrasound screening; complaints about abnormal uterine bleeding; external uterine orifice polyps visualized during gynecological examination with a mirror, colposcopy, and ultrasound scanning. Thefindings were processed using a package of Statistica programs for Windows 6.0 Stat-Soft. Results. Complications were detected in 16 (0.45%) women of the total number of the examinees with IP who underwent diagnostic or operative hysteroscopy. The most common HC was uterine perforation in 5 (0.14%) women. In the early postoperative period, a complication, such as hematometra, was diagnosed in 3 (0.08%) patients. Two (0.06%) of the 3570 patients had more than one complication. There were a total of 3587 operations; 17 (0.48%) patients had > 1 operation. Conclusion. The likelihood of complications significantly decreased in women over 50 years of age as compared to those aged < 35 years. The timely recognition of HC is primarily essential to implement therapeutic measures and to reduce their negative sequels on women’s health.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Armen Bagdasaryan

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: armenikus@mail.ru
candidate of medical sciences, doctoral candidate

Sergey Sarkisov

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: 734l497@mail.ru
doctor of medical sciences, professor, head of the innovation Department of minimally invasive technologies of academician

Bibliografia

  1. Baggish M.S., Valle R.F., Guedj H. Hysteroscopy: visual perspectives of uterine anatomy, physiology & pathology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. 518 p.
  2. Munro M.G. Complications of hysteroscopic and uterine resectoscopic surgery. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. North Am. 2010; 37(3): 399-425.
  3. Jansen F.W., Vredevoogd C.B., Van Ulzen K., Hermans J., Trimbos J.B., Trimbos-Kemper T.C. Complications of hysteroscopy: a prospective multicenter study. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000; 96(2): 266-70.
  4. Aydeniz B., Gruber I.V., Schauf B., Kurek R., Meyer A., Wallwiener D. A multicenter survey of complications associated with 21,676 operative hyster-oscopies. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2002; 104(2): 160-4.
  5. Федоров И.В., Сигал Е.И., Бурмистров М.В. Осложнения эндоскопической хирургии, гинекологии и урологии: Руководство для врачей. М.: Триада-X; 2012. 288 с.
  6. Панкратов В.В., Ягудаева И.П., Давыдов А.И., Белоцерковцева Л.Д. Качество здоровья и отдаленные результаты гистерорезектоскопии у больных подслизистой миомой матки. Вопросы гинекологии, акушерства и перинаталогии. 2012; 11(3): 5-10.
  7. Shveiky D., Rojansky N., Revel A., Benshushan A., Laufer N., Shushan A. Complications of hysteroscopic surgery: «Beyond the learning curve». J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2007; 14(2): 218-22.
  8. Agostini A., Cravello L., Shojai R., Ronda I., Roger V., Blanc B. Postoperative infection and surgical hysteroscopy. Fertil. Steril. 2002; 77(4): 766-8.
  9. Santos N.C., Pinho J.R., Lemos M.F., Moreira R.C., Lopes C.M., Sacilotto M.T. et al. Risk of hepatitis B virus transmission by diagnostic hysteroscopy. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2004; 37(5): 683-9.
  10. Baggish M.S., Sze E.H.M. Endometrial ablation: a series of 568 patients treated over an 11-year period. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1996; 174(3): 908-13.
  11. Istre O. Managing bleeding, fluid absorption and uterine perforation at hys-teroscopy. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2009; 23(5): 619-29.
  12. Anger J.T., Litwin M.S., Wang Q., Pashos C.L., Rodriguez L.V. Complications of sling surgery among female Medicare beneficiaries. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007; 109(3): 707-14.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Declaração de direitos autorais © Bionika Media, 2014

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies