Postoperative complications of surgery for genital prolapse and stress urinary incontinence with synthetic prostheses


Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

Objective. To present the frequency, pattern, and causes of complications after surgical correction of genital prolapse and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with synthetic prostheses. Subject and methods. Among 310 operated women, complications requiring surgical correction were diagnosed in 31 (10.0±1.7%) cases during the first day to 3 years after surgery. Results and discussion. Resurgery consisted in excising the implanted prosthesis partially or entirely and in surgically recorrecting SUI. Conclusion. Errors of surgical techniques are the main cause of postoperative complications. Reoperations after interventions using synthetic prostheses are accompanied by an increased risk for damage to the bladder and urethra and must be performed by experienced surgeons.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Alexander Nechiporenko

Grodno State Medical University

Email: Nechiporenko_al@mail.ru
Candidate of Medical Science (PhD), Assistant of the Department of Surgery II

Nikolai Nechiporenko

Grodno State Medical University

Email: Nechiporenko_nik@mail.ru
MD, Professor, Head of the Department of Surgery II

Bibliografia

  1. Беженарь В.Ф., Богатырева Е.В., Цыпурдеева А.А., Цуладзе Л.К., Русина Е.И., Гусева Е.С. Новые возможности хирургической коррекции тазового пролапса с использованием синтетических имплантов: пути профилактики послеоперационых осложнений. Акушерство. Гинекология. Репродукция. 2012; 6(2): 6-13. [Bezhenar V.F. Bogatyreva E.V., Tsypurdeeva A.A., Tsuladze L.K., Rusina E.I., Guseva E.S. New features of surgical correction of pelvic prolapse using synthetic implants: ways to prevent postoperative complications. Obstetrics. Gynecology. Reproduction. 2012; 6 (2): 6-13.]
  2. Argirovic R., Berisavac M., Likic-Ladevic I., Kadija S., Boskovic V., Zizic V. Transvaginal mesh in repair of pelvic organs prolapse as a minimally invasive surgical procedure. Vojnosanit. Pregl. 2011; 68(7): 583-8.
  3. Banach R., Antosiak B., Blewniewska G., Malinowski A. Ocena bespieczenstwa I wczesnych wynikow leczenia zaburzen statyki narz^dow piciowych (ZSNP) w zaleznosci od rodzaju zastosowanej siatki I techniki jej zakladania. Ginekol. Pol. 2013; 84(7): 596-602.
  4. Benbouzid S., Cornu J.N., Benchikh A., Chanu T., Haab F., Delmas V. Pelvic organ prolapse transvaginal repair by the Prolift system: evaluation of efficacy and complications after a 4.5 years follow up. Int. J. Urol. 2012; 19(11): 1010-6.
  5. Galczynski K., Futyma K., Bar K., Rechberger T. Uszkodzenie p^cherza moczowego w trakcie operacji slingowej w leczeniu nietrzymania moczu - przeglqd literatury i opis przypadku. Ginekol. Pol. 2012; 83(10): 784-8.
  6. Goeschen K., Petros P.P. Der weibliche Beckenboden Funktionelle Anatomie, Diagnostik und Therapie nach der Integralteorie. Heidelberg: Springer Medicin Verlag; 2009. 278 s.
  7. Rechberger Т., Tomaszewski J. Powikiania po operacjach urogyneko-logicznych z uzyciem materiaiow protezujqcych. In: Rechberger T., ed. Uroginekologia praktyczna. Lublin; 2007: 299-307.
  8. Краснопольский В.И., Попов А.А., Абрамян К.Н., Пушкарь Д.Ю., Гвоздев М.Ю., Малхасян В.А., Серегин А.В., Петрова В.Д., Добровольская Т.Б., Насырова Н.И. Осложнения Mesh-вагинопексии: результаты многоцентрового исследования. Урология. 2012; 1: 29-32. [Krasnopolsky V.I., Popov A.A., Abramyan K.N., Pushkar D.Yu., Gvozdev M.Yu., Malkhasyan V.A., Seregin A.V., Petrova V.D., Dobrovolskaya T.B., Nasyrova N.I. Mesh-vaginopeksiyas: Results of a multicenter study. Urology. 2012; 1: 29-32.]
  9. Нечипоренко Н.А., Нечипоренко А.Н. Синтетические протезы в оперативном лечении женщин с недержанием мочи при напряжении, сочетающимся с генитальным пролапсом. Урология. 2010; 1: 25-9. [Nechyporenko N.A., Nechyporenko A.N. Synthetic prostheses in the surgical treatment of women with stress urinary incontinence, combined with genital prolapse. Urology. , 2010; 1: 25-9.]
  10. Нечипоренко Н.А., Егорова Т.Ю., Юцевич Г.В. Синтетические протезы в хирургическом лечении женщин с выпадением половых органов. Акушерство и гинекология. 2009; 2: 64-6. [Nechyporenko N.A., Egorova T.Yu., Yutsevich G.V. Synthetic prostheses in the surgical treatment of women with genital prolapse. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009; 2: 64-6.]
  11. Нечипоренко А.Н. Осложнения петлевых антистрессовых операций у женщин с использованием синтетических материалов. ARS medica. 2013; 5(75): 106-10. [Nechyporenko A.N. Complications of antistressful loop operations in women using synthetic materials. ARS medica. 2013; 5 (75): 106-10.]

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Declaração de direitos autorais © Bionika Media, 2014

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies