Transluminal endoscopy (vNOTES): total hysterectomy
- Autores: Musin I.I.1, Yashchuk A.G.1, Kolodyazhnaya E.A.1, Nasyrova S.F.1, Galanova Z.M.1, Molokanova A.R.1, Imelbaeva A.G.1
-
Afiliações:
- Bashkir State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
- Edição: Nº 4 (2024)
- Páginas: 126-131
- Seção: Exchange of Experience
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0300-9092/article/view/632142
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2023.305
- ID: 632142
Citar
Texto integral
Acesso aberto
Acesso está concedido
Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes
Resumo
Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a new approach used in various surgical disciplines. In this article we describe our experience of performing transvaginal surgeries vNOTES.
Objective: To describe and illustrate a standardized approach to vNOTES hysterectomy.
Materials and methods: A total of 31 patients aged 48 to 59 years old underwent vNOTES surgery. The study was carried out on the basis of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Results: Hysterectomy with tubal removal was performed in 21 cases, hysterectomy with unilateral salpingoophorectomy was done in 7 cases, hysterectomy and bilateral salpingoophorectomy were performed in 3 cases. All the patients had less severe pain syndrome in the postoperative period: the average value of pain intensity according to the VAS scale after 24 hours was 2.4; the average duration of vNOTES surgery was 96 minutes (ranging from 70 to 130 minutes). The advantages of vNOTES compared to traditional laparoscopic approaches are reduction of postoperative pain, early activation, faster recovery of patients after surgery, shorter hospital stay, improved cosmetic effect and reduced risk of intraoperative injuries to internal organs.
Conclusion: Transluminal endoscopic surgery vNOTES combines good access and visualization provided by endoscopy, maximum cosmetic effect, and can be considered as an alternative to other minimally invasive procedures. This method is preferable for obese patients, as well as for patients who refuse traditional laparoscopy wishing to obtain aesthetic and cosmetic results.
Palavras-chave
Texto integral
Sobre autores
Ilnur Musin
Bashkir State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: ilnur-musin@yandex.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0001-5520-5845
Dr. Med. Sci., Associate Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with the course of IDPO
Rússia, UfaAlfiya Yashchuk
Bashkir State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: alfiya_galimovna@mail.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0003-2645-1662
Dr. Med. Sci., Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with the course of IDPO
Rússia, UfaElena Kolodyazhnaya
Bashkir State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: elena_l_a@list.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0001-5133-7293
clinical resident of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with the course of IDPO
Rússia, UfaSvetlana Nasyrova
Bashkir State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: ufa863@mail.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-2313-7232
PhD, Associate Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with the course of IDPO
Rússia, UfaZulfiya Galanova
Bashkir State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: kafedraagidpo2@mail.ru
PhD, Associate Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with the course of IDPO
Rússia, UfaAngela Molokanova
Bashkir State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: angella1210@mail.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0003-1115-6775
postgraduate student of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with the course of IDPO
Rússia, UfaAlbina Imelbaeva
Bashkir State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: kafedraagidpo2@mail.ru
PhD, Associate Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with the course of IDPO
Rússia, UfaBibliografia
- Aarts J.W., Nieboer T.E., Johnson N., Tavender E., Garry R., Mol B.W., Kluivers K.B. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015; 2015(8): CD003677. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5.
- Семиколенова В.А., Андреев А.А., Лаптиёва А.Ю., Глухов А.А. Современные минимально инвазивные технологии в гинекологической практике. Сибирское медицинское обозрение. 2022; 4: 39-45. [Semikolenova V.A., Andreev A.A., Laptiyova A.Yu., Glukhov A.A. Modern minimally invasive technologies in gynecological practice. Siberian Medical Review. 2022; (4): 39-45. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.20333/25000136-2022-4-39-45.
- European Union. Surgical operations and procedures statistics 2019 [2020 June 14]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics -explained/pdfscache/37391.pdf
- Lee S.H., Oh S.R., Cho Y.J., Han M., Park J.W., Kim S.J. et al. Comparison of vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Womens Health. 2019; 19(1): 83. https://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/s12905-019-0784-4.
- Druenne J., Presles E., Corsini T., Campagne Loiseau S., Curinier S., Mansour A. et al. vNOTEsHC: Hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic for large uteri: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Facts Views Vis. Obgyn. 2023; 15(3): 277-81. https://dx.doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.15.3.083.
- Волков О.А., Шрамко С.В., Ренге Л.В., Салтыкова П.Е., Сабанцев М.А., Шишея Е.Ю., Коваль Е.Ю., Власенко А.Е., Чубарь Е.А. Осложнения лапароскопической гистерэктомии: поиск факторов риска. Акушерство и гинекология. 2022; 9: 122-8. [Volkov O.A., Shramko S.V., Renge L.V., Saltykova P.E., Sabantsev M.A., Shisheya E.Yu., Koval E.Yu., Vlasenko A.E., Chubar E.A. Complications of laparoscopic hysterectomy: search for risk factors. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2022; (9): 122-8 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2022.9.122-128.
- Interdonato M.L., Scollo P., Bignardi T., Massimello F., Ferrara M., Donatiello G. et al. Hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: An Italian initial experience. Front. Med. (Lausanne). 2022; 9: 1018232. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1018232.
- Su H., Yen C.F., Wu K.Y., Han C.M., Lee C.L. Hysterectomy via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): feasibility of an innovative approach. Taiwan J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012; 51(2): 217-21. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2012.04.009.
- Sarkar A., Sivaranjani P., Zangmo R., Roy K.K., Ghotra M.K., Seelam R.R., Pandey S. Comparison of outcomes following vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in benign hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol. Minim. Invasive Ther. 2023; 12(4): 195-202. https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/gmit.gmit_88_22.
- Baekelandt J.F., De Mulder P.A., Le Roy I., Mathieu C., Laenen A., Enzlin P. et al. Hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopy as a day-care procedure: a randomized controlled trial. BJOG. 2019; 126(1):105-13. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15504.
- Housmans S., Noori N., Kapurubandara S., Bosteels J.J.A., Cattani L., Alkatout I. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis on hysterectomy by Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications. J. Clin. Med. 2020; 9(12): 3959. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9123959.
- Kaya C., Yıldız Ş., Alay İ., Aslan Ö., Aydıner İ.E., Yaşar L. et al. The comparison of surgical outcomes following laparoscopic hysterectomy and vNOTES hysterectomy in obese patients. J. Invest. Surg. 2022; 35(4): 862-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2021.1927262.
- Huang Y.T., Yang L.Y., Pan Y.B., Huang H.Y., Wu K.Y., Wang C.J., Weng C.H. Learning curve analysis of transvaginal natural orifice adnexal surgery. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2020; 27(2): 489-97. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.jmig.2019.04.009.
- Tolcher M.C., Kalogera E., Hopkins M.R., Weaver A.L., Bingener J., Dowdy S.C. Safety of culdotomy as a surgical approach: implications for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. JSLS. 2012; 16(3): 413-20. https://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13462882735854.
- Yoon S.H., Kim S.N., Shim S.H., Kang S.B., Lee S.J. Bilateral salpingectomy can reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in the general population: A meta-analysis. Eur. J. Cancer. 2016; 55: 38-46. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.12.003.
- Торубаров С.Ф., Духин А.О., Чмыр Е.Н. Fast track в гинекологии: реалии сегодняшнего дня. Акушерство и гинекология. 2019; 10: 60-5. [Torubarov S.F., Dukhin A.O., Chmur E.N. Fast track in gynecology: today’s realities. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019; (10): 60-5. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2019.10.60-65.
- Chaccour C., Giannini A., Golia D'Augè T., Ayed A., Allahqoli L., Alkatout I. et al. Hysterectomy using vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery compared with classic laparoscopic hysterectomy: a new advantageous approach? A systematic review on surgical outcomes. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 2023; 88(4):187-96. https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/ 000530797.
- Ящук А.Г., Молоканова А.Р., Мусин И.И., Абсалямова Д.Ф., Нурмухаметва Р.И. Транслюминальная эндоскопия (v-NOTES): крестцово-маточная фиксация при апикальном пролапсе. (Клинический опыт). Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2023; 5(2): 76-80. [Yashchuk A.G., Molokanova A.R., Musin I.I., Absalamova D.F., Nurmukhametova R.I. Transluminal endoscopy (v-NOTES): sacroiliac fixation in apical prolapse. (Clinical experience). Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2023; 23(1): 76-80. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.17116/rosakush20232301176.
Arquivos suplementares
