Assessment of the impact of male factor infertility on the outcomes of assisted reproductive technology programs using machine learning techniques
- Autores: Drapkina Y.S.1, Makarova N.P.2, Kulakova E.V.2, Kalinina E.A.2
-
Afiliações:
- cademician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia
- Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia
- Edição: Nº 7 (2024)
- Páginas: 96-105
- Seção: Original Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0300-9092/article/view/635289
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2024.44
- ID: 635289
Citar
Texto integral
![Acesso aberto](https://journals.eco-vector.com/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/text_open.png)
![Acesso é fechado](https://journals.eco-vector.com/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/text_unlock.png)
![Acesso é fechado](https://journals.eco-vector.com/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/text_lock.png)
Resumo
Background: The interpretation of spermogram parameters in dynamic observation remains debatable, and investigation of the significance and impact of some parameters on the effectiveness of infertility treatment using assisted reproductive technologies (ART) under the circumstances of increasing rate of male factor infertility is extremely relevant. Data analysis using machine learning (ML) enables more accurate and targeted determination of most significant correctable and non-correctable predictors of pregnancy after using ART programs.
Objective: The purpose of the study was determination of the significance and impact of each parameter characterizing the quality of the ejaculate on pregnancy rate, as well as the impact of these indicators on the embryonic stage of ART programs using linear regression and machine learning techniques.
Materials and methods: The retrospective study included 1021 married couples. The study analyzed spermogram data on the day of transvaginal ovarian puncture depending on the clinical and embryological outcomes in ART programs using decision tree and linear regression algorithms.
Results: The analysis of linear regression and decision tree models showed different results of the significance of each factors of spermogram in determining the outcomes of the embryonic stage and pregnancy rate. It is noteworthy that the decision tree demonstrated high significance of the indicator “sperm concentration in 1 ml, mln”.
Conclusion: The results of the study reflect not only perspectives for further research in this area, but also the need to optimize the readiness of men for ART programs. Linear regression models not always capture hidden trends in the large volume of the analyzed information.
Palavras-chave
Texto integral
![Acesso é fechado](https://journals.eco-vector.com/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/text_lock.png)
Sobre autores
Yulia Drapkina
cademician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: yu_drapkina@oparina4.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-0545-1607
PhD, Researcher at the Department of IVF named after Prof. B.V. Leonov
Rússia, MoscowNatalya Makarova
Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: np_makarova@oparina4.ru
PhD, Leading Researcher at the Department of IVF named after Prof. B.V. Leonov
Rússia, MoscowElena Kulakova
Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: e_kulakova@oparina4.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4433-4163
PhD, Senior Researcher at the IVF Department named after Prof. B.V. Leonov
Rússia, MoscowElena Kalinina
Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: e_kalinina@oparina4.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-8922-2878
Dr. Med. Sci., Professor, Head of the IVF Department named after Prof. B.V. Leonov
Rússia, MoscowBibliografia
- Zegers-Hochschild F., Adamson G.D., Dyer S., Racowsky C., de Mouzon J., Sokol R. et al. The international glossary on infertility and fertility care, 2017. Fertil. Steril. 2017; 108(3): 393-406. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.fertnstert.2017.06.005.
- Vander Borght M., Wyns C. Fertility and infertility: definition and epidemiology. Clin. Biochem. 2018; 62: 2-10. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.clinbiochem.2018.03.012.
- Приказ Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации N 108н от 28.02.2019 «Об утверждении правил обязательного медицинского страхования» (с изменениями 13.12.2022 №789н). [Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 108n dated 28.02.2019 "On approval of the rules of compulsory health insurance" (as amended 13.12.2022 No.789n). (in Russian)].
- Приказ Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации от 31 июля 2020 г. № 803н «О порядке использования вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий, противопоказаниях и ограничениях к их применению». [Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation of July 31, 2020 No. 803n "On the procedure for using assisted reproductive technologies, contraindications and restrictions on their use". (in Russian)].
- Корнеева И.Е., Назаренко Т.А., Перминова С.Г., Митюрина Е.В., Цыбизова Т.И., Дашиева А.Э. Медико-социальные факторы бесплодия в России. Акушерство и гинекология. 2023; 3: 65-72. [Korneeva I.Е., Nazarenko Т.А., Perminova S.G., Mityurina E.V., Tsybizova T.I., Dashieva A.E. Medical and social factors of infertility in Russia. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2023; (3): 65-72. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2022.279.
- Лебедев Г.С., Голубев Н.А., Шадеркин И.А., Шадеркина В.А., Аполихин О.И., Сивков А.В., Комарова В.А. Мужское бесплодие в Российской Федерации: статистические данные за 2000-2018 годы. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2019; 4: 4-12. [Lebedev G.S., Golubev N.A., Shaderkin I.A., Shaderkina V.A., Apolikhin O.I., Sivkov A.V., Komarova V.A. Male infertility in the Russian Federation: statistical data for 2000-2018. Experimental and Clinical Urology. 2019; (4): 4-12. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.29188/ 2222-8543-2019-11-4-4-12.
- Шатылко Т.В., Гамидов С.И., Франкевич В.Е., Стародубцева Н.Л., Гасанов Н.Г., Тамбиев А.Х. Астенозооспермия и протеомные факторы регуляции подвижности сперматозоидов. Акушерство и гинекология. 2020; 4: 37-44. [Shatylko T.V., Gamidov S.I., Frankevich V.E., Starodubtseva N.L., Gasanov N.G., Tambiev A.Kh. Asthenozoospermia and proteomic factors regulating sperm motility.Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020; (4): 37-44. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2020.4.37-44.
- Овчинников Р.И., Гамидов С.И., Попова А.Ю., Ушакова И.В., Голубева О.Н. Привычное невынашивание беременности - что зависит от мужчины? Акушерство и гинекология. 2016; 12: 15-23. [Ovchinnikov R.I., Gamidov S.I., Popova A.Yu., Ushakova I.V., Golubeva O.N. Recurrent miscarriage: what depends on a male partner? Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016; (12): 15-23. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2016.12.15-23.
- Danis R.B., Samplaski M.K. Sperm morphology: history, challenges, and impact on natural and assisted fertility. Curr. Urol. Rep. 2019; 20(8): 43. https:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11934-019-0911-7.
- Jiang V.S., Bormann C.L. Artificial intelligence in the in vitro fertilization laboratory: a review of advancements over the last decade. Fertil. Steril. 2023; 120(1): 17-23. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.05.149.
- You J.B., McCallum C., Wang Y., Riordon J, Nosrati R, Sinton D. Machine learning for sperm selection. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2021; 18(7): 387-403. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41585-021-00465-1.
- Choi R.Y., Coyner A.S., Kalpathy-Cramer J., Chiang M.F., Campbell J.P. Introduction to machine learning, neural networks, and deep learning. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 2020; 9(2): 14. https://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.2.14.
- Драпкина Ю.С., Макарова Н.П., Татаурова П.Д., Калинина Е.А. Поддержка врачебных решений с помощью глубокого машинного обучения при лечении бесплодия методами вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий. Медицинский совет. 2023; 17(15): 27-37. [Drapkina Yu.S., Makarova N.Р., Tataurova P.D., Kalinina E.A. Deep machine learning applied to support clinical decision-making in the treatment of infertility using assisted reproductive technologies. Medical Council. 2023; 17(15): 27-37. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.21518/ms2023-368.
- Олефир Ю.В., Виноградов И.В., Родионов М.А., Живулько А.Р., Попов Д.М., Монаков Д.М. Шестое руководство ВОЗ по обработке и исследованию эякулята: все новое - это хорошо забытое старое? Вестник урологии. 2023; 11(1): 171-6. [Olefir Yu.V., Vinogradov I.V., Rodionov M.A., Zhyvul’ko A.R., Popov D.M., Monakov D.M. The sixth edition of the WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen: is everything new a well-forgotten old? Urology Herald. 2023; 11(1): 171-6. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2023-11-1-171-176.
- Cooper T.G., Noonan E., von Eckardstein S., Auger J., Baker H.W., Behre H.M. et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2010; 16(3): 231-45. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmp048.
- Chua A.C., Abdul Karim A.K., Tan A.C.C., Abu M.A., Ahmad M.F. The outcome of intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI): do the sperm concentration and motility matter? Horm. Mol. Biol. Clin. Investig. 2021; 42(4): 367-72. https://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hmbci-2020-0089.
- Timofeeva A., Drapkina Y., Fedorov I., Chagovets V., Makarova N., Shamina M. et al. Small noncoding RNA signatures for determining the developmental potential of an embryo at the morula stage. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020; 21(24): 9399. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21249399.
- Nagy Z.P., Liu J., Joris H., Verheyen G., Tournaye H., Camus M. et al. The result of intracytoplasmic sperm injection is not related to any of the three basic sperm parameters. Hum. Reprod. 1995; 10(5): 1123-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136104.
- Tannus S., Son W.Y., Gilman A., Younes G., Shavit T., Dahan M.H. The role of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in non-male factor infertility in advanced maternal age. Hum. Reprod. 2017; 32(1): 119-24. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew298.
- Mercan R., Lanzendorf E.S., Mayer J. Jr, Nassar A., Muasher S.J., Oehninger S. The outcome of clinical pregnancies following intracytoplasmic sperm injection is not affected by semen quality. Andrologia. 1998; 30(2): 91-5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0272.1998.tb01152.x.
- Zaninovic N., Rosenwaks Z. Artificial intelligence in human in vitro fertilization and embryology. Fertil. Steril. 2020; 114(5): 914-20. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.09.157.
- Goyal A., Kuchana M., Ayyagari K.P.R. Machine learning predicts live-birth occurrence before in-vitro fertilization treatment. Sci. Rep. 2020; 10(1): 20925. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76928-z.
- Peng T., Liao C., Ye X., Chen Z., Li X., Lan Y. et al. Machine learning-based clustering to identify the combined effect of the DNA fragmentation index and conventional semen parameters on in vitro fertilization outcomes. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2023; 21(1): 26. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-023-01080-y.
Arquivos suplementares
![](/img/style/loading.gif)