CLINICAL AND ANAMNESTIC CHARACTERISTICS OF WOMEN WITH IDIOPATHIC PRETERM LABOR IN CASE OF A SLAVIC POPULATION


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

Objective. To study the role of clinical and anamnestic risk factors of preterm labor in a Slavic female population of Russia. Subject and methods. Three hundred and four women with idiopathic preterm labor (n = 92) and spontaneous term labor (n = 212) were examined. Their history data and overall clinical manifestations were examined in detail. The significance of the obtained results was calculated by statistical methods. Results. The women with preterm labor had significantly low educational level, frequently smoked more cigarettes during pregnancy, they were single or married twice or more. The family and their histories of preterm births were more common in women who had given birth to a premature baby. The women had often a history of infectious diseases, such as both sustained infections in childhood, frequent acute respiratory diseases in adulthood, and infectious and inflammatory diseases of reproductive organs. They had significantly more frequently an obstetric and gynecological history: abortions, spontaneous miscarriages, and infertility; preterm births proved to be the most important risk factor. Complicated pregnancy was also significantly more common in the preterm labor group. Conclusion. Identification of clinical and anamnestic risk factors makes it possible to predict the risk of preterm labor in a woman when planning and in the early stages of pregnancy and to more validly choose patient management tactics and preventive measures before the clinical signs of threatened preterm labor occur.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Zulfiya Khodzhaeva

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

M.D., Ph.D., Professor, Principal Investigator, Department of Maternal-Fetal Medicine 117997, Russia, Moscow, Oparina street, 4

Olga Fedotovskaya

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: o_fedotovskaya@oparina4.ru
Postgraduate Student 117997, Russia, Moscow, Oparina street, 4

Andrey Donnikov

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: a_donnikov@oparina4.ru
Ph.D. scientist of the laboratory of molecular genetics methods 117997, Russia, Moscow, Oparina street, 4

参考

  1. Morin M., Arnaud C., Germany L., Vayssiere C. Preterm birth: evolution 1994 to 2006. Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil. 2012; 40(12): 746-52.
  2. Goldenberg R.L., Culhane J.F., Iams J.D., Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008; 371: 75-84.
  3. Ip M., Peyman E., Lohsoonthorn V., Williams M.A. A case-control study of preterm delivery risk factors according to clinical subtypes and severity. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2010; 36(1): 34-44.
  4. Berkowitz G.S., Blackmore-Prince C., Lapinski R.H., Savitz D.A. Risk factors for preterm birth subtypes. Epidemiology. 1998; 9: 279-85.
  5. Lo C.C., Hsu J.J., Hsieh C.C., Hsieh T.T., Hung T.H. Risk factors for spontaneous preterm delivery before 34 weeks of gestation among Taiwanese women. Taiwan J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007; 46: 389-94.
  6. Chen C.P., Wang K.G., Yang Y.C., See L.C. Risk factors for preterm birth in an upper middle class Chinese population. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 1996; 70: 53-9.
  7. McManemy J., Cooke E., Amon E., Leet T. Recurrence risk for preterm delivery. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007; 196(6): 576. e1-6. discussion 576. e6-7.
  8. Nguyen N., Savitz D.A., Thorp J.M. Risk factors for preterm birth in Vietnam. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2004; 86: 70-8.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Bionika Media, 2014
##common.cookie##