MAIN ANATOMIC LANDMARKS FOR PROSTHETIC SURGICAL RECONSTRUCTION OF THE PELVIC FLOOR VIA VAGINAL ACCESS


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

Prosthetic reconstruction of the pelvic floor via vaginal access is a common and effective approach to treating the obvious forms of pelvic organ prolapse. The specificity of this technology is an abundance of blind steps when a surgeon has no direct visual control of manipulations - all is based on tactile sensations and spatial sense. Under these conditions, a thorough knowledge is a key condition for surgical safety. Objective. To identify main anatomic landmarks for safe implantation of mesh endoprostheses via vaginal access, by applying harpoon fixators, and to determine the optimal sizes of endoprostheses to achieve the necessary result in most patients. Subjects and methods. A total of 120 women underwent radiographic examination (pelvic bone X-ray, small pelvis computed tomography (CT), and small pelvis CT angiography. The examination revealed no statistically significant correlation between the patients’ anthropometric measurements (height, weight) and the distance between the obturator foramens and ischial spines. Results. These distances were found to vary minimally. The interspinous distance was 108.03+5.91 mm (range, 96.14-124.04 mm); the interobturator foramina distance was 61.09±4.71 mm (range, 49.20-71.67 mm). Examination of angiographic images showed that on sacrospinal fixation of a prosthesis, the points of injection should be offset by at least 1.5-2.5 cm from the ischial spine and be strictly within the sacrospinous ligament in order to prevent damage to vascular structures. The safe zone in the obturator foramen is in its inferomedial corner. Conclusion. The findings could determine the optimal size of an endoprosthesis. Thus, for the prevention of obstruction of the rectum and the neck of the urinary bladder on troacar-free application of meshes, the optimal length of the interspinous and interobturator parts of implantation should be 15 and 10 cm, respectively.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Dmitry Shkarupa

Saint Petersburg Medical Center, Ministry of Health of Russia (University Clinic, Saint Petersburg State University)

Email: shlarupa.dmitry@mail.ru
urologist, MD, deputy director for medical care 190103, Russia, St. Petersburg, Fontanka Embankment 154

Nikita Kubin

Saint Petersburg Medical Center, Ministry of Health of Russia (University Clinic, Saint Petersburg State University)

PhD, urologist, Department of Urology 190103, Russia, St. Petersburg, Fontanka Embankment 154

Nikita Peshkov

Saint Petersburg Medical Center, Ministry of Health of Russia (University Clinic, Saint Petersburg State University)

Email: nopeshkov@yandex.ru
urologist, a graduate student of the Department of Urology 190103, Russia, St. Petersburg, Fontanka Embankment 154

Tatiana Pridvizhkina

I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia

PhD, radiologist, head of the department of radiation diagnostics 190103, Russia, St. Petersburg, Fontanka Embankment 154

Boris Komyakov

Nikiforov All-Russian Center of Emergency and Radiation Medicine, Russian Ministry for Civil Defense, Emergencies and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters

Email: komyakovbk@mail.ru
Head of the Department of Urology Saint Petersburg 197374, Optikov str. 54, Russia

Nariman Hadzhiyev

Nikiforov All-Russian Center of Emergency and Radiation Medicine, Russian Ministry for Civil Defense, Emergencies and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters

Email: nariman.gadjiev@gmail.com
PhD, urologist, Department of Urology Saint Petersburg 197374, Optikov str. 54, Russia

参考

  1. Wu J.M., Matthews С.A., Conover ММ., Pate V., Jonsson Funk М. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014; 123(6): 1201-6.
  2. Azai's H., Charles C.J., Delporte P, Debodinance P. Prolapse repair using the Elevate™ kit: prospective study on 70 patients. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2012; 23(10): 1421-8.
  3. Stanford E.J., Moore R.D., Roovers J.P., Courtieu C., Lukban J. C., Bataller E. et al. Elevate anterior/apical: 12-month data showing safety and efficacy in surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapsed. Female Pelvic Med. Reconstr. Surg. 2013; 19(2): 79-83.
  4. Rapp D.E., King A.B., Rowe B., Wolters J.P. Comprehensive evaluation of anterior elevate system for the treatment of anterior and apical pelvic floor descent: 2-year followup. J. Urol. 2014; 191(2): 389-94.
  5. KobayashiH., Haneda Y., Kira S., Tsuchida T, ArakiI., Takeda M. Tailor-made mesh for pelvic organ prolapses: correlation between patient’s height and mesh size. Open J. Urol. 2013; 3(2): 121-3.
  6. Azai's H., Bassil A., Giraudet G., Rubod C., Lucot J.P, Cosson M. How to manage peroperative haemorrhage when vaginally treating genital prolapse. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. ReprodBiol. 2014; 178: 203-7.
  7. Roshanravan S.M., Wieslander C.K., Schaffer J.I., Corton M.M. Neurovascular anatomy of the sacrospinous ligament region in female cadavers: implications in sacrospinous ligament fixation. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007; 197(6): 660. el-6.
  8. Chen C.C., Gustilo-Ashby AM., Jelovsek J.E., Paraiso M.F.R. Anatomic relationships of the tension-free vaginal mesh trocars. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007; 197(6): 666. el-6.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Bionika Media, 2016
##common.cookie##