OPTIMIZATION OF SCREENING FOR VAGINAL INFECTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

Objective. To investigate the possibilities of early screening for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, to validate and comparative analyze the currently available test kits for self-sampling of vaginal biomaterial. Subjects and methods. A multicenter simple study comparing two test systems for self-sampling of vaginal biomaterial, which are intended for early diagnosis of HPV infection, was conducted. At the screening stage, 110 women aged 21 to 45 years (mean age 29+0.6 years) were examined; four vaginal fluid samples were taken from each of them and found to contain bacteria and viruses. The systems were validated by STIs caused by Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Mycoplasma genital, Trichomonas vaginalis, or human papillomavirus. Twenty-two HPVgenotypes and viral load were determined using real-time multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay with detection of results. The clinical examination of the patients embraced traditional assessment of complaints, collection of clinical and anamnestic data, physical examination, clinical examination, and determination of the gynecological status; vaginal fluid (VF) pH-metry was also carried out. Results. The indicator of the quality of material sampling using the studied procedures is comparable in the levels of ≥4 lg (p > 0.005). The detection rate for the infections is comparable both when a physician takes a smear from the vagina and cervical canal and when two test systems compared are used (p > 0.005). The use of these methods could detect HPV of different types in 23 out of the 110 examined women, which amounted to 20.9%. Eleven of the 22 HPV types tested were identified. There was a complete coincidence of the studied and compared methods in 108 patients. Conclusion. The comparative analysis of the two methods for self-sampling of vaginal biomaterial showed that they were identical to medical manipulations, as well as the high reliability of the results of the study. Unlike the foreign analogue, the Russian test system had advantages. This system can be recommended to implement HPV-associated disease screening programs in clinical practice.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Eugene Kira

Institute for Postgraduate Training of Physicians, N.I. Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: profkira33@gmail.com
honored scientist of the Russian Federation, honored Doctor of the Russian Federation, academician of RAS, MD, Professor, head of the Department of Women’s Diseases and Reproductive health of the lInstitute for Improvement of Physicians 105203, Russia, Moscow, Nizgnya Pervomayskaya str. 70

Ksenia Semenova

City Polyclinic Seventeen

Email: semenovakl98l@mail.ru
Doctor obstetrician-gynecologist 195176, Russia, St. Petersburg, Metallistov str. 56

Maria Bobrova

INVITRO LLC

Email: mbobrova@invitro.ru
the head of the organizational-methodical Department of interaction with specialists of the healthcare sector l25047, Russia, Moscow, 4th Tverskaya-Yamskaya str. l6, bld. 3

Anna Belyakova

INVITRO LLC

Email: abelyakova@invitro.ru
candidate of medical sciences, Doctor of Clinical and Laboratory Diagnostics l25047, Russia, Moscow, 4th Tverskaya-Yamskaya str. l6, bld. 3

Natalia Gasilova

INVITRO LLC

Email: NGasilova@invitro.ru
Head of the Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics l25047, Russia, Moscow, 4th Tverskaya-Yamskaya str. l6, bld. 3

参考

  1. Суламанидзе Л.А., Назарова Н.М., Прилепская В.Н., Бурменская О.В., Демура Т.А., Гордеев С.С., Чупрынин В.Д., Трофимов Д.Ю. Результаты ВПЧ-генотипирования эпителия шейки матки и анальной области у пациенток с цервикальными интраэпителиальными неоплазиями. Гинекология. 2016; 18(1): 45-8.
  2. Костин А.А., Старинский В.В., Самсонов Ю.В., Асратов А.Т. Анализ статистических данных о злокачественных новообразованиях, ассоциированных с вирусом папилломы человека. Исследования и практика в медицине. 2016; 3(1): 66-78.
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence and cost of sexually transmitted infections in the United States. February 2013.
  4. Andrae B., Kemetli L., Sparén P., Silfverdal L., Strander B., Ryd W., Dillner J., Törnberg S. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden. J. Natl.Cancer Inst. 2008; 100(9): 622-9.
  5. Oscarsson M.G., Benzein E.G., Wijma B.E. Reasons for non-attendance at cervical screening as reported by non-attendees in Sweden. J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2008; 29(1): 23-31.
  6. Sanner K., Wikström I., Strand A., Lindell M., Wilander E. Self-sampling of the vaginal fluid at home combined with high-risk HPV testing. Br. J. Cancer. 2009; 101(5): 871-4.
  7. Артымук Н.В., Марочко К.В. Эффективность выявления вируса папилломы человека при помощи устройства для самостоятельного забора вагинального отделяемого. Акушерство и гинекология. 2016; 3: 85-91.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Bionika Media, 2018
##common.cookie##