American non-nuclear missiles, regional missile defense systems and the collapse of the INF Treaty

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат ақылы немесе тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The U.S. withdrawal from the INF Treaty and the return of “great power competition” are among the factors that have ensured Washington’s development of long-range non-nuclear offensive weapons. In turn, the development of regional missile defense has been going on in parallel since the 1990s. The purpose of this article is to determine the specifics of the relationship between U.S. policies on the development of non-nuclear offensive missiles and regional missile defense. This study is necessary to understand the prospects for development of the segments of U.S. military policy responsible for projecting American military power in key regions. A thorough review is provided of three levels of integration of offensive and defensive missile systems: doctrinal, programmatic, technical. It is concluded that the relationship under study began at the level of doctrinal documents of the U.S. military and political leadership, and then proceeded more at the technical level than at the programmatic one.

Авторлар туралы

O. Krivolapov

Georgy Arbatov Institute for the U.S. and Canada studies

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: o.krivolapov@iskran.ru
Moscow, Russia

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Anichkina T.B. (2018) Prompt Global Strike: the U.S. Strategic Systems and Low-Intensity Conflicts. In: Konflikty nizkoi intensivnosti v amerikanskoi voenno-politicheskoi strategii v nachale 21 veka. Ed. Bakyuk V.I. Moscow: Izdatelstvo VES MIR. Pp. 19–36. (In Russ.)
  2. Klimov V.A., Oznobishchev S.K. (2023) U.S. Missile Defense: From National Territory Protection to NATO Defense. World Economy and International Relations, no. 12, pp. 5–15. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-12-5-15 (In Russ.)
  3. Stefanovich D.V. (2023) Hypersonic systems of offensive arms. In: Mezhdunarodnaya bezopasnost': novyi miroporyadok i tekhnologicheskaya revolutsiya. Ed(s). Arbatov A.G., Bogdanov K.V., Gusarova O.V., Evtodieva M.G. Moscow: Izdatelstvo VES MIR. Pp. 52–64. (In Russ.)
  4. Chekov A.D. (2023) Transformation of U.S. Missile Defense Policy in the Context of Countering Hypersonic Weapons. World Economy and International Relations, no. 4, pp. 40–52. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-4-40-52 (In Russ.)
  5. Chekov A.D., Babkina S.K. (2023) Hypersonic Weapons: Evolution or Revolution? Mezhdunarodnye protsessy, no. 2, pp. 82–102. https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2023.21.2.73.5 (In Russ.)
  6. Chekov A. (2024) Five Years without the INF Treaty: Lessons and Prospects. Russia in Global Affairs. No. 4. Pp. 24–47. https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6374-2024-22-4-24-47
  7. Chekov A., Krivolapov O., Bogdanov K., Stefanovich D., Klimov V. (2023) The Shoot Down/Miss the Target Dilemma: The Evolution of Missile Defense and Its Implications for Arms Control. Moscow: Valdai Discussion Club.
  8. Cohn J. et al. (2019) Leveling the Playing Field. Reintroducing U.S. Theater-Range Missile in a Post-INF World. Washington, DC: CSBA.
  9. Green B. (2020) Offense–Defense Integration for Missile Defeat: The Scope of the Challenge. Washington, DC: CSIS.
  10. Karako T., Dahlgren M. (2022) Complex Air Defense. Countering the Hypersonic Missile Threat. Washington, DC: CSIS.
  11. Klare M. (2019) An ‘Arms Race in Speed’: Hypersonic Weapons and the Changing Calculus of Battle. Arms Control Today. Vol. 49. June.
  12. Kühn U. (2019) Between a rock and a hard place: Europe in a post-INF world. The Nonproliferation Review. Vol. 26. Issue 1-2. Pp. 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2019.1593677
  13. Nouwens V. et al. (2024) Long-range strike capabilities in the Asia-Pacific. Implications for regional stability. London: IISS.
  14. Oelrich I. (2020) Cool your jets: Some perspective on the hyping of hypersonic weapons. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Vol. 76. Issue 1. Pp. 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2019.1701283
  15. Panda A. (2023) Indo-Pacific Missile Arsenals. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
  16. Simon L., Lanoszka A. (2020) The Post-INF European Missile Balance: Thinking about NATO’s Deterrence Strategy. Texas National Security Review. No 3. Pp. 12–30.
  17. Stefanovich D.V. (2024a) Assessing the Development of New Types of Conventional Weapons. In: Security Index Yearbook 2024–2025. Vol. 1. Ed(s): Orlov V.A., Karnauhova E.A. Moscow: Aspect Press. Pp. 85–99.
  18. Stefanovich D.V. (2024b) Proliferation of Missile Technologies in Asia-Pacific Region. In: Strategic Review 2024. Ed. Arbatov A.G. Moscow: MGIMO University. Pp. 301–320.
  19. Sugden B.M. (2022) Analyzing the Potential Disruptive Effects of Hypersonic Missiles on Strategy and Joint Warfighting. Joint Forces Quarterly. No. 104. Pp. 6–21.
  20. Tracy C., Wright D. (2021) Modeling the Performance of Hypersonic Boost-Glide Missiles. Science and Global Security. No. 3. Pp. 135–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/08929882.2020.1864945
  21. Tracy C., Wright D. (2023) Hypersonic Weapons: Vulnerability to Missile Defenses and Comparison to MaRVs. Science and Global Security. No. 3. Pp. 68–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/08929882.2023.2270292

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025