Dublin Core |
PKP Metadata Items |
Metadata for this Document |
1. |
Title |
Title of document |
Express diagnostic of acetabular fractures. Part I. X-ray associated anatomy, simple fractures diagnostic algorithm (part I) |
2. |
Creator |
Author's name, affiliation, country |
S. S. Stoyukhin; “City clinical hospital No. 15. O. M. Filatov” Department of health of Moscow; Russian Federation |
2. |
Creator |
Author's name, affiliation, country |
A. F. Lazarev; National medical researchcenter for traumatology and orthopedics N.N. Priorova Ministry of Health of Russia; Russian Federation |
2. |
Creator |
Author's name, affiliation, country |
Ya. G. Gudushauri; National medical researchcenter for traumatology and orthopedics N.N. Priorova Ministry of Health of Russia; Russian Federation |
2. |
Creator |
Author's name, affiliation, country |
S. E. Solod; National medical researchcenter for traumatology and orthopedics N.N. Priorova Ministry of Health of Russia; Russian Federation |
3. |
Subject |
Discipline(s) |
|
3. |
Subject |
Keyword(s) |
acetabulum; fracture; radiologic diagnostic; classification; algorithm |
4. |
Description |
Abstract |
This article describes main radiologic signs of bony structures that form acetabulum. The methods of poly projection x-rays study and evaluation of it are described. Also, authors show rational algorithm of choosing fracture type according to Judet—Letournel classification. Case presentation is based on simple fracture types. |
5. |
Publisher |
Organizing agency, location |
Eco-Vector |
6. |
Contributor |
Sponsor(s) |
|
7. |
Date |
(DD-MM-YYYY) |
15.09.2019
|
8. |
Type |
Status & genre |
Peer-reviewed Article |
8. |
Type |
Type |
Review Article |
9. |
Format |
File format |
|
10. |
Identifier |
Uniform Resource Identifier |
https://journals.eco-vector.com/0869-8678/article/view/47191 |
10. |
Identifier |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) |
10.17116/vto201903137 |
10. |
Identifier |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) (PDF (Rus)) |
10.17816/vto201926337-48-32336 |
11. |
Source |
Title; vol., no. (year) |
N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics; Vol 26, No 3 (2019) |
12. |
Language |
English=en |
ru |
13. |
Relation |
Supp. Files |
Fig. 1. Ileopectineal line on AP pelvic X-ray and on schematic pelvis. (435KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62009 Fig. 2. Ileoischial line on AP pelvic X-ray and on schematic pelvis. (457KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62010 Fig. 3. Acetabular roof on AP pelvic X-ray and on schematic pelvis. (464KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62011 Fig. 4. Teardrop line on AP pelvic X-ray and on schematic pelvis. (485KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62013 Fig. 5. Posterior wall brim on AP pelvic X-ray and on schematic pelvis. (524KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62014 Fig. 6. Anterior wall brim on AP pelvic X-ray and on schematic pelvis. (290KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62016 Fig. 7. Intact obturatot foramen on AP pelvic X-ray and on schematic pelvis. (571KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62017 Fig. 8. Shenton line on AP pelvic X-ray and on schematic pelvis. (247KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62019 Fig. 9. Anterior column brim on inlet pelvic X-ray and on schematic pelvis. (372KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62020 Fig. 10. Posterior column brim on inlet pelvic X-ray and on schematic pelvis. (365KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62022 Fig. 11. Schematic view of obturetor oblique and iliac oblique X-ray made with beam deviation. (97KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62023 Fig. 12. АР Pelvic X-ray of patient with suspected acetabular fracture. (389KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62024 Fig. 13. Iliac oblique view made CITO method. Arrows shows fracture lines crossing acetabulum. (94KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62026 Fig. 14. АР pelvic X-ray of patient with acetabular fracture. (339KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62027 Fig. 15. Obturator oblique view made with CITO method. Arrows shows separated posterior wall fragment. (155KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62028 Fig. 16. Simple acetabuar fractures according to R. Judet and E. Letournel aclassification. (212KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62029 Fig. 17. Complex acetabuar fractures according to R. Judet and E. Letournel aclassification. (206KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62031 Fig. 18. Reference lines colours on X-rays. (40KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62032 Fig. 19. First step of posterior wall fracture diagnostic. (433KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62034 Fig. 20. Second step of posterior wall fracture diagnostic. (438KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62035 Fig. 21. Posterior wall fracture verification on obturetor oblique view. (436KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62036 Fig. 22. First step of anterior wall fracture diagnostic. (424KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62037 Fig. 23. Second step of anterior wall fracture diagnostic. (369KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62038 Fig. 24. а — intact reference lines; b — combination of reference lines. (383KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62040 Fig. 25. Final diagnostic and verification of anterior wall fracture. (383KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62041 Fig. 26. First step of posterior column fracture diagnostic. (386KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62043 Fig. 27. Second step of posterior column fracture diagnostic. (395KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62044 Fig. 28. Verification of posterior column fracture. (378KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62045 Fig. 29. Obturetor oblique view. (190KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62047 Fig. 30. First step of anterior column fracture diagnostic. (432KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62048 Fig. 31. Third step of anterior column fracture diagnostic. (465KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62049 Fig. 32. First step of transverse fracture diagnostic. (404KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62050 Fig. 33. Second step of transverse fracture diagnostic. (478KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62052 Fig. 34. Verification of transverse fracture. (479KB) doi: 10.17816/vto47191-62053 |
14. |
Coverage |
Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) |
|
15. |
Rights |
Copyright and permissions |
Copyright (c) 2019 Eco-Vector
|