Transfemoral Approach at Revision Hip Arthroplasty



Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Results of 41 revision hip arthroplasties (41 interventions) via transfemoral approach were analyzed. That approach was used in stem fracture — 12 (29.26%) cases, cement removal — 20 (48.78%) cases and removal of partially ingrown cementless stem — 9 (21.95%) cases. Techniques of window, oblique, longitudinal oblique osteotomy and resection of greater trochanter were applied. As compared with standard revision intervention the duration of operation was about 40 minutes longer (159 min versus 125 min) and blood loss increased almost for 1 liter (2240 ml versus 1510 ml). Intraoperative complications were registered in 5 (12.20%) patients including 1 case of transverse femur fracture at oblique osteotomy (2.44%), 1 case of femur fracture at window osteotomy (2.44%), 2 cases of greater trochanter fracture (4.88%), 1 case of femoral cortical perforation by the cutter at distal stem fragment removal (2.44%). Excellent and good results were obtained in 30 (73.17%) patients. Indications to every type of transfemoral approach are presented.

Full Text

Результаты применения трансфеморального доступа при ревизионном эндопротезировании тазобедренного сустава
×

References

  1. Lieberman J.R., Moeckel B.H., Evans B.G., Salvati E.A., Ranawat C.S. Cement-within-cement revision hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1993; 75 (6): 869-71.
  2. McCallum J., Hozack W. Recementing a femoral component into a stable cement mantle using ultrasonic tools. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.1995; (319): 232-7.
  3. Pianta T.J., Lieberman J.R. Cement retention in revision total hip arthroplasty: filling the hole. Orthopedics. 2008; 31 (9): 909-10.
  4. Holt G., Hook S., Hubble M. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the femoral side using cemented implants. Int. Orthop. 2011; 35 (2): 267-73.
  5. Judl T, Jahoda D., Landor I., Pokorny D., Melichereik P., Sosna A. Cement-within-cement femoral stem reimplantation technique. Acta Chir. Orthop. Traumatol. Cech. 2011; 78 (5): 416-22.
  6. Brooks A.T., Nelson C.L., Hofmann O. Minimal femoral cortical thickness necessary to prevent perforation by ultrasonic tools in revision joint surgery. Arthroplasty. 1995; 10: 359-62.
  7. Wagner H. A revision prosthesis for the hip joint [German]. Orthopade 1989; 18 (5): 438-53.
  8. Younger T.I., Bradford M.S., Magnus R.E., Paprosky W.G. Extended proximal femoral osteotomy. A new technique for femoral revision arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty. 1995; 10: 329-38.
  9. Загородний Н.В., Нуждин В.И., Бухтин К.М., Каграманов С.В. Результаты применения бедренных компонентов цементной фиксации при ревизионном эндопротезировании тазобедренного сустава. Вестник травматологии и ортопедии им. Н.Н. Приорова. 2012; 3: 32-8.
  10. Загородний Н.В. Эндопротезирование тазобедренного сустава. Основы и практика: Руководство. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2011.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2013 Eco-Vector


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-76249 от 19.07.2019.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies