On current problems of the mechanism of liability of judges for disciplinary misconduct: law enforcement practice, general approaches. Part 4. Approaches to improving and improving the efficiency of the organizational and legal mechanism of disciplinary responsibility of judges (The end)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

In the final, fourth, part of the article, published in 2024 in the journal “State and Law”, certain results of the problems considered in its first three parts are summed up (part 1 – “Termination of the powers of a judge for a serious offense after the constitutional innovations of 2020 – constitutional or disciplinary responsibility?” (No. 3); part 2 – “On problems of disciplinary responsibility of court heads” (in two sections) (No. 4, 5); part 3 – “On the disciplinary responsibility of retired judges” (No. 6)). Conclusions are drawn about the imperfection of this mechanism with specific examples of law enforcement (and especially judicial) practice, including those caused by the imperfection of legislation in the area of public relations under consideration. Specific, including radical, proposals are being made aimed at improving and increasing the effectiveness of both the named mechanism as a whole and its individual links.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Mikhail I. Kleandrov

Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: mklean@bk.ru

Corresponding Member of RAS, Doctor of Law, Professor, Chief Researcher 

Russian Federation, 10 Znamenka str., 119019 Moscow

References

  1. Aleshkova I. A. Peculiarities of proceedings in the Disciplinary court presence // Russ. Justice. 2011. No. 2 (58). Pp. 55–63 (in Russ.).
  2. Burdina E. V. The form of a disciplinary body for judges: a disciplinary court or a body of the judicial community // Lex russia. 2014. No. 11 (vol. XCVI). P. 1365 (in Russ.).
  3. Voronov A. V. On Disciplinary judicial presence, the judicial system, types of legal proceedings and separation of po-wers // Legislation. 2010. No. 10. Pp. 66–72 (in Russ.).
  4. Dryakhlov S. K., Kalinovsky K. B. Bringing judges to disciplinary responsibility under the new Russian legislation // Russ. Iustice. 2010. No. 2 (46). P. 37 (in Russ.).
  5. Eremina S. N., Janikyan M. V. The legal nature of disciplinary judicial presence: problems of interaction between Labor and Civil Procedural Law // Arbitration and Civil Procedure. 2011. No. 6. Pp. 2–6 (in Russ.).
  6. Kleandrov M. I. Mechanism of ethical responsibility of a judge: problems of formation. M., 2017 (in Russ.).
  7. Kleandrov M. I. On the Supreme body of judicial power of the Russian Federation // State and Law. 2023. No. 8. Pp. 51–63 (in Russ.).
  8. Kleandrov M. I. On the Council of Judicial Power in the Russian Federation. M., 2016 (in Russ.).
  9. Kleandrov M. I. Judge or not judge: on the institute of nullity of a judicial act // Russ. Justice. 2016. No. 12 (128). Pp. 29– 38 (in Russ.).
  10. Korchagin A. Yu. Institute of judicial responsibility in pre-revolutionary Russia // Platon. 2014. No. 4. P. 7 (in Russ.).
  11. Osin V. V. On the disciplinary judicial presence and protection of the rights of citizens // Lawyer. 2010. No. 2 (in Russ.).
  12. Polyakov I. N. Shortcomings of the legal regulation of the procedure for considering cases of disciplinary responsibility of judges // Russ. judge. 2012. No. 5. Pp. 38–41 (in Russ.).
  13. Polyakov I. N. Proceedings in the Disciplinary Court Presence – a new type of civil proceedings // Arbitration and Civil Procedure. 2012. No. 2 (in Russ.).
  14. Ryzhov D. S. The supreme disciplinary presence of the Governing Senate as a body overseeing judicial institutions in post-reform Russia // Law and Politics. 2007. No. 9. P. 110 (in Russ.).
  15. Fokov A. P. Towards the VII All-Russian Congress of Judges // Russ. judge. 2009. No. 1. P. 11 (in Russ.).
  16. Fokov A. P. On the disciplinary court presence // Russ. judge. 2010. No. 1 (in Russ.).
  17. Yudin A. V. Procedural aspects of the functioning of the Disciplinary Court Presence // Herald of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. 2010. No. 2. Pp. 40– 46 (in Russ.).
  18. Yakovlev A. E. Historical aspects of disciplinary responsibility of judges // Russ. Justice. 2007. No. 10. P. 68 (in Russ.).
  19. Yakovlev V. F., Semigin G. Yu. Commercial justice in Russia. Vol. 3. Legal settlement of economic disputes in the USSR. M., 2005. P. 166 (in Russ.).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Fig. 1

Download (85KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences