All-Russian Scientific Conference with international participation “The concept of law: history and theory (on the 300th anniversary of the birth of Immanuel Kant)”
- 作者: Krotkova N.V.1
-
隶属关系:
- Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- 期: 编号 9 (2024)
- 页面: 212-231
- 栏目: Scientific life
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/1026-9452/article/view/649130
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S1026945224090203
- ID: 649130
如何引用文章
详细
The review of the conference offers views on law that are widespread in Russian theoretical and legal science. The outstanding role of the founder of German classical philosophy I. Kant in the formation of the Philosophy of Law is noted. His idea of a categorical imperative is aimed at creating a model of a state governed by the Rule of Law, where a person is declared not only a means, but also a goal. Kant is one of those who formed the metaphysical Philosophy of Law, i. e. the branch of knowledge that creates semantic models in the world of political and legal reality. The influence of Kant on the Russian and European Philosophy of Law, the importance of his ideas for modernity is shown.
全文:

作者简介
Natalya Krotkova
Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: krotkova2012@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2853-1287
PhD in Law, Leading Researcher, Constitutional Law and Constitutional Justice Sector, Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vice-Editor-in-Chief of the Journal “State and Law” of the Russian Academy of Sciences
俄罗斯联邦, 10 Znamenka str., 119019 Moscow参考
- Gurvich G. D. The future of democracy // Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology. 2000. Vol. III. No. 1 (in Russ.).
- Evdeeva N. V. Integrative theories of legal understanding in modern Russia: dis. … PhD in Law. N. Novgorod, 2005. P. 11 (in Russ.).
- Ershov V. V. Regulation of legal relations. M., 2020. P. 60 (in Russ.).
- Zhukov V. N. Kantianism and Neo-Kantianism in the Russian Sociology of Law // State and Law. 2015. No. 9. P. 15 (in Russ.).
- Ilyenkov E. V. On idols and ideals. M., 1968. Pp. 68–80 (in Russ.).
- Kant I. Critique of pure reason // Kant I. Essays: in 8 vols. M., 1994. Vol. 3. Pp. 151, 153, 154 (in Russ.).
- Kant I. Critique of pure reason / transl. from German by N. O. Lossky with variants translated into Russian and European languages. M., 1999. P. 549 (in Russ.).
- Kant I. Metaphysics of morals. M., 2007. Pp. 75, 286 (in Russ.).
- Kant I. Metaphysics of morals: in 2 parts // Kant I. Essays: in 6 vols. M., 1965. Vol. 4. Part 2. P. 139 (in Russ.).
- Kant I. Essays: in 6 vols. / under the general ed. of V. F. Asmus, A. V. Gulygi, T. I. Oizerman. M., 1965. Vol. 4. Part 2. Pp. 79, 87, 133, 139, 233–240; 1966. Vol. 6. Pp. 25–36 (in Russ.).
- Kant I. Dispute of faculties / trans. from German Ts. G. Arzakanyan, I. D. Koptsev, M. I. Levina; ed. L. A. Kalinnikov. Kaliningrad, 2002. P. 62 (in Russ.).
- Kornev V. N. Monistic and integrative (synthetic) theories of substantiation of the nature of the state and law // Russ. Justice. 2017. No. 5 (133). P. 27 (in Russ.).
- Lazarev V. V. Integrative perception of law // Legal science: history and modernity. 2017. No. 2. P. 27 (in Russ.).
- Lazarev V. V. Search for law // Journal Russ. law. 2004. No. 7 (91). P. 13 (in Russ.).
- Lesiv B. V. Predictability of law and prediction of judicial decisions in the teachings of O. Holmes // Justice. 2023. Vol. 5. No. 2. Pp. 43–66 (in Russ.).
- Lifshits M. A. Poetic justice. M., 1993. Pp. 238, 239 (in Russ.).
- Lukyanchikova L. V. Issues of democracy in the political and philosophical thought of the Russian diaspora // Law and the State: Theory and Practice. 2010. No. 12 (72). Pp. 144– 148 (in Russ.).
- Lunacharsky A. Notes of the philosopher. Excursions to the “Polar Star” and its surroundings // Education. 1906. No. 3. Pp. 96–99 (in Russ.).
- Marx K. Philosophical manifesto of the historical school of law // Marx K., Engels F. Essays. 2nd ed. M., 1955. Vol. 1. P. 88 (in Russ.).
- Marx K., Engels F. Manifesto of the Communist Party // Marx K., Engels F. Essays. 2nd ed. M., 1955. Vol. 4. P. 443 (in Russ.).
- Marx K., Engels F. German ideology // Marx K., Engels F. Essays. 2nd ed. M., 1955. Vol. 3. P. 182 (in Russ.).
- Razumovsky I. P. Problems of the Marxist theory of law. M., 1925. Pp. 85–87 (in Russ.).
- Solomko Z. V. In the circles of legal Neo-Kantianism: on the phenomenon of reception of Kantian Philosophy of Law in Russian legal understanding // Gaps in Russ. legislation. 2012. No. 1. Pp. 229–232 (in Russ.).
- Stuchka P. I. The revolutionary role of law and the state // Stuchka P. I. Elected speaker according to the Marxist-Leninist theory of law. Riga, 1964. P. 200 (in Russ.).
- Turgenev I. Notes of a hunter: essays. SPb., 2019. P. 170 (in Russ.).
- Frolova E. A. Methodological pluralism of legal understanding: problems of theory and Philosophy of Law // Justice. 2021. Vol. 3. No. 3. Pp. 17–32 (in Russ.).
- Frolova E. A. Methodology of the Neo-Kantian Philosophy of Law: the transition from “due” to “existing” // State and Law. 2023. No. 4. Pp. 42–49 (in Russ.).
- Frolova E. A. Rational grounds of law: classics and modernity. M., 2020 (in Russ.).
- Frolova E. A. Philosophy of Law in Russia: Neo-Kantianism (the second half of the XIX – the first half of the XX century). M., 2021 (in Russ.).
- Chirkin S. V. Modern approaches to the construction of the Rule of Law [chap. V] // Modern concepts of the Rule of Law and the Rule-of-Law State: a comparative legal study / ed. by T. Ya. Khabrieva, A. Ya. Kovler. M., 2024. P. 173 (in Russ.).
- Cohen H. Ethik des reinen Willens. Berlin, 1904. S. 600.
- Holmes O. W. The Common Law. Cambridge, Mass., 2009. Pp. 187, 191.
- Kant I. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Königsberg, 1781. S. 180.
- Pfordten D. von der. Die Rechtsidee bei Kant, Hegel, Stammler, Radbruch und Kaufmann // Value Pluralism, Tolerance and Law / ed. Shing-I Liu, Taipei. Taiwan, 2004. S. 5, 16, 20, 28.
- Radbruch G. Grundzüge der Rechtsphilosophie. Leipzig, 1914. S. 39ff.
- Radbruch G. Rechtsphilosophie. Studienausgabe. Heidelberg, 1999. S. 209.
- Windelband W. Lehrbuch der Geschichte der Philosophie. Altenmünster, 2012. S. 564.
