Russian-Chinese round table “Modern legal science and education in Russia and China”

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

The Round Table addresses issues of modern legal education and legal science in Russia and China. It is noted that in these countries, legal education and legal science are going through a transitional period. In both Russia and China, the introduction of market mechanisms and extensive contact with the West have led to the transformation of jurisprudence. Scientists and teachers faced the problem of adapting the national legal tradition to new historical conditions. The comparative analysis of Russia and China is also interesting because both states have a socialist past, and the legal system, legal science and legal education of China have experienced a noticeable influence of the USSR.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Natalya Krotkova

Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: krotkova2012@yandex.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0003-2853-1287

PhD in Law, Leading Researcher of the Sector of Constitutional Law and Constitutional Justice, Deputy Editor-in-Chief of the journal “State and Law”

Rússia, Moscow

Bibliografia

  1. Krotkova N. V. All-Russian Conference with international participation “The history of political and legal doctrines as a scientific and educational discipline” // State and Law. 2023. No. 8. Pp. 191–206 (in Russ.).
  2. Leger R. Great legal systems of modernity. M., 2009. Pp. 491, 492, 501 (in Russ.).
  3. Marx K. Economic and philosophical manuscripts of 1844 and other early philosophical works. M., 2010. P. 59 (in Russ.).
  4. Marx K., Engels F. The Holy Family // Marx K., Engels F. Essays. M., 1955. Vol. 2. P. 102 (in Russ.).
  5. Montesquieu Sh. L. Selected works. M., 1955. Pp. 357, 412, 656 (in Russ.).
  6. The main legal systems of modernity / R. David, K. Joffre-Spinosi; transl. from French. V. A. Tumanov. M., 2019 (in Russ.).
  7. Heffe O. Politika. Law. Justice. Fundamentals of the critical Philosophy of Law and the state. M., 1994. P. 291 (in Russ.).
  8. Zhou Qiang. To study in depth the spirit of the 4th Plenum of the CPC Central Committee of the nineteenth convocation, to constantly promote the modernization of the judicial system and judicial capabilities // People’s justice. 2020. No. 1 (in Russ.).
  9. Chirkin V. E. Global legal systems, legal families and their classification // Law. HSE Journal. 2017. No. 4. Pp. 26, 27 (in Russ.).
  10. Chicherin B. N. The history of political teachings: in 5 parts. M., 1872. Part 2. P. 355 (in Russ.).
  11. Butler W. E. Comparative International Law // Journal of Comparative Law. 2015. Vol. 10. No. 1. Pp. 241–254.
  12. Juppe А. Montesquieu. Le moderne. P., 1999. Pp. 15, 242.
  13. Resta G. The ‘Comparative Method’ at the Roots of Comparative Law. In: Dedek H., ed. A Cosmopolitan Jurisprudence: Essays in Memory of H. Patrick Glenn. ASCL Studies in Comparative Law. Cambridge University Press, 2021. Pp. 44–63.
  14. Wigmore J. H. A New Way of Teaching Comparative Law // Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law. 1926. Pp. 6–16.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024