The role of expression of monocarboxylates of the first and fourth types (MCT1, MCT4) by tumor and stromal cells of prostate cancer in determining the prognosis and the efficiency of definitive treatment


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Aim. A search for new methods for diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer is of importance due to the insufficient accuracy of modern methods in detecting aggressive tumors. One of the promising opportunities for the early diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer is the assessment of the glycolytic profile of the tumor by determining the expression of monocarboxylates (MCT) types 1 and 4 in tumor cells, as well as in adjacent stromal cells. Materials and methods. An analysis of patients of who underwent radical prostatectomy at the Institute ofUrology and Reproductive Health of Sechenov University from 2015 to 2017 was carried out. The patients with histologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma were included in the study. Among them, the presence or absence of biochemical recurrence during the first year was studied. An immunohistochemical (IHC) study of postoperative specimen was performed to determine the expression of MCT1 and MCT4 by tumor and stromal cells. The correlation between the intensity of their expression and the risk of biochemical recurrence and the tumor characteristics was evaluated. Results. High membrane expression of MCT1 directly correlated with high stromal expression of MCT4 (r=0.314, p<0.003). A significant direct correlation was found between the predominance of stromal expression of MCT4 over membrane expression and biochemical recurrence (r=0.403, p<0.001), as well as a high ISUP group (4 and 5) (r=0.294, p=0.005). Conclusions. Determination of the level of expression of type 1 and 4 monocarboxylate transporters in adenocarcinoma cells and tumor stromal cells can become an effective tool for risk stratification, and may also predict the biological behaviors of the prostate cancer and the efficiency of definitive treatment.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

S. V Vovdenko

Institute of Urology and Reproductive Health, FGAOU VO I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: vovdenkostanislav@yandex.ru
Ph.D. student Moscow, Russia

A. O Morozov

Institute of Urology and Reproductive Health, FGAOU VO I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: andrei.o.morozov@gmail.com
senior researcher Moscow, Russia

S. T Avraamova

Institute of clinical morphology and digital pathology of FGAOU VO I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: avraamovast@mail.ru
Ph.D., assistant Moscow, Russia

N. S Aleksandrov

Institute of clinical morphology and digital pathology of FGAOU VO I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: dr.klauss@mail.ru
Ph.D., associate professor Moscow, Russia

N. V Zharkov

Institute of clinical morphology and digital pathology of FGAOU VO I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: nickzharkov@mail.ru
Ph.D. in Biology, senior assistant Moscow, Russia

V. S Saenko

Institute of Urology and Reproductive Health, FGAOU VO I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: saenko_vs@mail.ru
Ph.D., MD, professor Moscow, Russia

E. A Kogan

Institute of clinical morphology and digital pathology of FGAOU VO I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: koganevg@gmail.com
Ph.D., MD, professor Moscow, Russia

E. A Bezrukov

Institute of Urology and Reproductive Health, FGAOU VO I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: eabezrukov@rambler.ru
Ph.D., MD, professor Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Loeb S. и др. Over diagnosis and over treatment of prostate cancer. EurUrol. Elsevier, 2014;65(6):1046-1055.
  2. Catalona W.J. Prostate Cancer Screening. Medical Clinics of North America. W.B. Saunders, 2018;102(2):199-214.
  3. Hanahan D., Weinberg R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: then extgeneration. Cell. Cell. 2011;144(5):646-674.
  4. Pertega-Gomes N. et al. Aglycolyticphenotype is associated with prostate cancer progression and aggressiveness: A role for monocarboxylate transporters as metabolic targets for therapy. J Pathol. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. 2015;236(4):517-530.
  5. Pertega-Gomes N., Baltazar F. Lactate transporters in the context of prostate cancer metabolism: What do we know? International Journal of Molecular Sciences. MDPI AG, 2014;15(10):18333-18348.
  6. Costello L.C. et al. Role of zinc in the pathogenesis and treatment of prostate cancer: Critical issues to resolve. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 2004;7(2):111-117.
  7. Costello L.C., Franklin R.B., Feng P. Mitochondrial function, zinc, and intermediary metabolism relationships in normal prostate and prostate cancer. Mitochondrion. Mitochondrion. 2005;5,(3): 143-153.
  8. Pertega-Gomes N., Baltazar F. Lactate transporters in the context of prostate cancer metabolism: What do we know? International Journal of Molecular Sciences. MDPI AG, 2014;15(10):18333-18348.
  9. Franklin R.B., Costello L.C. Zinc as an anti-tumor agent in prostate cancer and in other cancers. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2007;463(2): 211-217.
  10. Franz M.C. et al. Zinc transporters in prostate cancer. Molecular Aspects of Medicine. Mol Aspects Med. 2013;34(2-3):735-741.
  11. Fraum T.J. et al. Prostate cancer PET tracers: Essentials for the urologist. Can J Urol. 2018;25(4):9371-9383.
  12. Elia I. et al. Organ-specific cancer metabolism and its potential for therapy. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology. Springer New York LLC. 2016;233:321-353.
  13. Hao J. et al. Co-expression of CD147 (EMMPRIN), CD44v3-10, MDR1 and monocarboxylate transporters is associated with prostate cancer drug resistance and progression. Br. J. Cancer. 2010; 103(7): 1008-1018.
  14. Pertega-Gomes N. идр. Monocarboxylate transporter 4 (MCT4) and CD147 overexpression is associated with poor prognosis in prostate cancer. BMC Cancer. BioMed Central Ltd., 2011;11.
  15. Fiaschi T. et al. Reciprocal metabolic reprogramming through lactate shuttle coordinately influences tumor-stroma interplay. Cancer Res. Cancer Res. 2012;72(19):5130-5140.
  16. Sanita P. et al. Tumor-stroma metabolic relationship based on lactate shuttle can sustain prostate cancer progression. BMC Cancer. BMC Cancer. 2014;14(1).
  17. Pertega-Gomes N. et al. A lactate shuttle system between tumour and stromal cells is associated with poor prognosis in prostate cancer. BMC Cancer. BioMed Central Ltd., 2014;14(1).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies