Evaluation of the adhesive characteristics of uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains in patients with spinal cord injuries


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The adhesion characteristics of 9 clinical E.coli strains, isolated from the urine of 9 patients with spinal cord injuries in late period were evaluated. Patient age was 21 to 54 years. Neurogenic urination disordes observed in patients were the result of a spinal injury in the cervical (5 patients), thoracic (2 patients) and thoracolumbar (2 patients) spine. The duration of disease ranged from 2 to 12 years. Despite primarily a low adhesion activity of tested strains, the formation of biofilm occurs on the surfaces having both hydrophobic (polystyrene) and hydrophilic (cover glass) properties. After 24 h, according to the photometric evaluation, 7 of 9 strains had weak, 1 - medium, and 1 - high ability to form biofilms. After 48 hours, only 4 strains had low ability to form biofilms, of whom 2 had an increase ability compared to the previous period of observation. Other strains possess the medium ability to form biofilm. When quantifying the ability of bacteria to form biofilms on the surface of the cover glass, it was revealed that a large fraction of the area of the field of view was accounted for microcolonies with size 10 μm 2 at 24 hours, and microcolony with size from 100 to 1000 μm 2 at 48 h. There were number of significant correlations between parameters studied. After 24 h, the correlation coefficient between the optical density (OD630) and the number, OD630 and proportion of microcolonies with size 10 to 10000 pm 2 varied from 0.79 to 0.9. After 48 hours, there was a direct correlation between the OD630 and the number (r = 0.73, P = 0.025), OD630 and proportion (r = 0.81, P = 0.009) of microcolonies with size 1,000 to 10,000 mkm 2.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

E. V Osipova

FSBI "Russian Scientific Center "Restorative Traumatology and Orthopaedics"n.a. Acad. G.A. Ilizarov" of RMPH

Email: E-V-OsipovA@mail.ru
Scientific and Clinical Laboratory of Microbiology and Immunology PhD in Biological Sciences, Senior Researcher

I. V Shipitsyna

FSBI "Russian Scientific Center "Restorative Traumatology and Orthopaedics"n.a. Acad. G.A. Ilizarov" of RMPH

Scientific and Clinical Laboratory of Microbiology and Immunology

References

  1. Roop Singh, Rajesh Kumar Rohilla, Kapil Sangwan, et al. Bladder management methods and urological complications in spinal cord injury patients. Indian J Orthop. 2011; 45(2): 141-147.
  2. Dedeic-Ljubovic A., Hukic M. Catheter-related urinary tract infection in patients suffering from spinal cord injuries. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2009; 9(1): 2-9.
  3. Jacobsen S.M., Stickler D.J., Mobley H.L.T. et al. Complicated Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections Due to Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008; 21(1): 26-59.
  4. Маянский А.Н. Цитокины и медиаторные функции уроэпителия в воспалительных реакциях мочевыводящей системы. Цитокины и воспаление. 2003;2(4):3-9.
  5. Clinical Management of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection Edited by Ahmad Nikibakhsh, Publisher: InTech. 2011.
  6. Тец В.В. Микроорганизмы и антибиотики. Заболевания мочевыводящих путей. СПб.: КЛЕ_Т. 2005.
  7. Скрябин Г.Н., Александров В.П., Кореньков Д.Г., Назаров Т.Н. Циститы (учебное пособие). СПб., 2006.
  8. Романова Ю.М., Диденко Л.В., Толордава Э.Р. и др. Биопленки патогенных бактерий и их роль в хронизации инфекционного процесса. Поиск средств борьбы с биопленками. Вестник РАМН. 2011; 10: 31-39.
  9. Лагун Л.В., Тапальский Д.В., Жаворонок С.В. Интенсивность образования микробных биопленок микроорганизмами, выделенными при пиелонефритах и мочекаменной болезни. Медицинский журнал. 2012;4:64-67.
  10. Cramton S.E., Ulrich M., Gotz F. et al. Anaerobic Conditions Induce Expression of Polysaccharide Intercellular Adhesin in Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infection and Immunity. 2001 ;69: 4079-4085.
  11. Бриллис В.И., Брилене Т.А., Ленцнер Х.П. и др. Методика изучения адгезивного процесса микроорганизмов. Лабораторное дело. 1986;4:210-212.
  12. OToole G.F., Kolter R. Flagellar and twitching motility are necessary for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. Mol. Microbiol. 1998;30:295-304.
  13. Stepanovic S., Vukovi D., Hola V. et al. Quantification of biofilm in microtiter plates: overview of testing conditions and practical recommendations for assessment of biofilm production by Staphylococci. APMIS. 2007; 115: 891-99.
  14. Гайдышев И.П. Решение научных и инженерных задач средствами Excel, VBA и C/C++. СПб.: ВХВ Петербург. 2004.
  15. Сидоренко С.В. Инфекционный процесс как «диалог» между хозяином и паразитом. Клиническая микробиология и антимикробная химиотерапия. 2001 ;3(4):301-315.
  16. Лопаткин Н.А., Аполихин О.И., Козлов Р.С., Перепанова Т.С. Рекомендации по ведению больных с инфекциями почек, мочевых путей и мужских половых органов. Изд. Европейская урологическая ассоциация Eau. 2007 ; 125-148.
  17. Tenke P., Koves B., Nagy K. et al. Update on biofilm infections in the urinary tract. World J Urol. 2012;30(1):51-57.
  18. Marchese A., Bozzolasco M., Gualco L. et al. Effect of fosfomycin alone and in combination with N-acetylcysteine on E. coli biofilms. Int. J Antimicrob. Agents. 2003;22:95-100.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies