Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitho-tripsy without nephrostomy


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The study included 138 patients with solitary and multiple renal stones. All patients underwent minipercutaneous nephrolithotripsy. The frequency of complete removal of the stones was 98%. Intraoperative complications were not recorded. Postoperative complications were assessed by the modified Clavien system (Dindo-modified). Complications of 0 degree were recorded in 102 (71.8%) cases, II - 38 (26.7%), and IIIa - only in 2 (1.5%) cases. In 80 (56.3%) cases, the upper urinary tract were drained using catheter-stent with an outer excretion through the urethra (group 1), in 58 (40.9%) cases - using catheter-stent with extraction of ligatures for nephrostomy to the lumbar region (2 group). In 4 (2.8%) patients, operation was completed by nephrostomy (group 3). In group 1, the average period of postoperative stay was 3-5 days, in the 2nd group - 3-7 days, in the group 3 - 4-7 days. None of the groups did not require opioid analgesics. Clinical observation is presented. Postoperative complications: in 86 (68%) patients - 0 according to the modified Clavien system (Dindo-modified), in 40 (30%) - II, and only in 2 - IIIa. In 78 (56.5%) cases, the upper urinary tract was drained using catheter-stent with an outer excretion through the urethra, in 56 (40.6%) cases - using catheter-stent with extraction of ligatures for nephrostomy to the lumbar region. In 4 (2.9%) patients operation was completed by nephrostomy. The average postoperative stay was 7.3 days. No patient required the appointment of opioid analgesics.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Yu. G Alyaev

SRI of uronephrology and human reproductive health «First MSMU n.a. I.M. Sechenov»

N. A Grigoryev

SRI of uronephrology and human reproductive health «First MSMU n.a. I.M. Sechenov»

G. N. Akopyan

SRI of uronephrology and human reproductive health «First MSMU n.a. I.M. Sechenov»

E. A Bezrukov

SRI of uronephrology and human reproductive health «First MSMU n.a. I.M. Sechenov»

S. Kh Ali

SRI of uronephrology and human reproductive health «First MSMU n.a. I.M. Sechenov»

Email: Nabilali095@gmail.com
urologist at the urological department № 3 OF urological clinic ECH № 2

Kh. M Ali

SRI of uronephrology and human reproductive health «First MSMU n.a. I.M. Sechenov»

References

  1. Michel M.S., Trojan L., Rassweiler J.J. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2007; 51: 899-906.
  2. Fernstrom I., Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy: A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1976; 10: 257-259.
  3. Мочекаменная болезнь: современные методы диагностики и лечения. Руководство. Аляев Ю.Г., Газимиев М.А., Руденко В.И., Сорокин Н.И., Саенко В.С., М., 2010.
  4. Chung B.I., Aron M., Hegarty N.J., Mihir M. Ureteroscopic versus Percutaneous Treatment for Medium-Size (1-2-cm) Renal Calculi. Desai Journal of Endourology. 2008; Feb; 343-346. J Endourol. 2001; Oct; 835-838.
  5. Wong C., Raymond J. Single Upper-Pole Percutaneous Access for Treatment of >5-cm Complex Branched Staghorn Calculi: Is Shockwave Lithotripsy Necessary? Leveillee Journal of Endourology. 2002; 477-481.
  6. Hendrikx A.J.M., Strijbos W.E.M., de Knijff D.W. et al. Treatment for Extended-Mid and Distal Ureteral Stones: SWL or Ureteroscopy? Results of a Multicenter Study. J Endourol. 1999; 727-733.
  7. Kruck S., Sonnleithner M., Hennenlotter J. et al. Interventional Stress in Renal Stone Treatment. J Endourol. 2011; 25(6): 1069-1073.
  8. Helal M., Black T., Lockhart J. et al. The Hickman peel-away sheath: Alternative for pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 1997; 11: 171-172.
  9. Jackman S.V., Docimo S.G., Cadeddu J.A. et al. The «miniperc» technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol. 1998; 16: 371-374.
  10. Jackman S.V., Hedican S.P., Peters C.A. et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants and preschool age children: experience with a new technique. Urology. 1998; 52: 697-701.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2014 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies