POTENTIALS OF PHYTOTHERAPY IN THE COMPLEX TREATMENT OF ACUTE PYELONEPHRITIS


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to increase the effectiveness of treatment of patients with acute pyelonephritis by incorporating of phytopreparation «Prolit Super Septo» in complex therapy. The study included 38 patients with acute primary pyelonephritis. All patients have received standard medical therapy, 21 of them (Group 2) have additionally received «Prolit Super Septo» 2 capsules 2 times a day for 1 month. Outcome measures included basic laboratory parameters, and results of bacteriological examination and immunological assessment of patients 12-14 and 28-30 days after initiation of therapy. Against the background of the therapy, positive dynamics of the level of leukocyturia and bacteriuria was detected in both groups; therapeutic effect, however, was more pronounced in the Group 2 treated with complex therapy: after the end of treatment, the proportion of sterile cultures was 85.7%, whereas in Group 1 - 70.6%. In addition, complex treatment had a positive effect on the immune status of patients, as evidenced by normalization of blood immunoglobulins, circulating immune complexes and C-reactive protein. The inclusion of «Prolit Super Septo» in the complex conservative treatment of patients with acute pyelonephritis promotes the development of an adequate immune response and the rapid elimination of the pathogens, thus preventing the development of purulent forms of the disease, or chronization of process.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

A. I Neymark

Altai State Medical University

Head - Prof. Department of Urology and Nephrology Barnaul

I. V Kablova

Altai State Medical University

Email: irina_kablova@mail.ru
Teaching Assistant at the Department of Urology and Nephrology Barnaul

References

  1. Аполихин О.А. и др. Состояние урологической заболеваемости в Российской Федерации по данным официальной статистики. Урология. 2008;3: 3-9.
  2. Довлатян А.А., Морозов Д.В., Аль-Курди И.М. Оперативная тактика при осложненных формах острого гнойного пиелонефрита беременных. Урология. 2002; 2: 10-13.
  3. Копейка А.А., Савицкая К.И., Пономарев В.К. и др. Характеристика бактериурии при некоторых урологических заболеваниях. Урология и нефрология. 1995; 4: 12-13.
  4. Аль-Шукри С.Х., Горбачев А.Г., Смирнов В.С. и др. Иммунное состояние у больных первичным и вторичным хроническим пиелонефритом. Урология и нефрология. 1996; 3: 17-20.
  5. Аносова Ю.А., Золотухин О.В., Кузьменко В.В. Состояние эндогенной инфекции и иммунологические изменения у больных с острым деструктивным пиелонефритом. Вестник новых медицинских технологий. 2010;17(2): 67-69.
  6. Арбулиев М.Г., Арбулиев К.М., Османов Г.М. К вопросу лечения гнойного пиелонефрита. Урология и нефрология. 1997; 6: 14-17.
  7. Новиков Д.К., Новикова Н.И. Клеточные методы иммунодиагностики. Минск. Беларусь. 1979. 222 с.
  8. Айвазян А.В., Войно-Ясенецкий А.М. Острые заболевания почек и мочевых путей. М., Наука. 1985. 264 с.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2014 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies