TRANSURETHRAL ELECTROENUCLEATION OF BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Currently, the choice of treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) remains one of the most pressing issues of Urology. The study explored the potentials of monopolar electroenucleation of BPH using a monopolar electrode-pusher and standard equipment for transurethral resection. From January to May 2013, 38 patients with infravesical obstruction caused by large BPH underwent transurethral monopolar electroenucleation. The control group (n = 44) consisted of patients who underwent the traditional monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate of the same size. All patients underwent an identical complex of clinical laboratory tests in the preoperative period and 1, 6 and 12 months after surgery. The technical features of the new technique are presented, intraoperative complications are assessed, early and late results and complications are evaluated. It has been established that one of the significant advantages of this method is the ability to remove significant amounts of adenomatous tissue with low risk of bleeding complications.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

A. G Martov

MRI FMBA; RMAPE; CCH № 57 of Moscow Healthcare Department

Email: martovalex@mail.ru
MD, Prof., Head of the Department of Urology; Professor at the Department of Endoscopic Urology; Head of the urological unit Moscow

D. V Ergakov

SBHCI "CCH №57 of Moscow Healthcare Department"; MRI FMBA

Department of Urology Moscow

A. S Andronov

SBHCI "CCH №57 of Moscow Healthcare Department"; MRI FMBA

Department of Urology Moscow

N. A Baykov

SBHCI "CCH №57 of Moscow Healthcare Department"; RMAPE

Department of Endoscopic Urology Moscow

References

  1. Mamoulakis C., Skolarikos A., Schulze M. et al. Results from an international multicentre double-blind randomized controlled trial on the perioperative efficacy and safety of bipolar vs monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate. BJU Int. 2012; 109: 240-248.
  2. Elmansy H.M., Kotb A., Elhilali M.M. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: Long-term durability of clinical outcomes and complication rates during 10 years of folIowup. J Urol. 2011; 186: 1972-1976.
  3. Kuntz R.M., Lehrich K., Ahyai S.A. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100 grams: 5-year follow-up results of a randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol. 2008; 53: 160-166.
  4. Gilling P.J., Aho T.F., Frampton C.M. et al. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: Results at 6 years. Eur Urol. 2008; 53: 744-749.
  5. Tan A., Liao C., Mo Z. et al. Meta-analysis of holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for symptomatic prostatic obstruction. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1201-1208.
  6. Мартов А.Г., Максимов В.А., Яровой С.Ю. и др. Трансуретральная гольмиевая энуклеация аденомы предстательной железы, Урология. 2011;1: 38-43.
  7. Севрюков Ф.А., Сорокин Д.А., Карпухин И.В. и др. Трансуретральнаяэнуклеацияпредстательнойжелезы(TUEB) -новый метод биполярной эндоскопической хирургии ДГПЖ. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2012;2: 34-36.
  8. Hiraoka Y., Shimizu Y., Iwamoto K. et al. Trial of complete detachment of the whole prostate lobes in benign prostate hyperplasia by transurethral enucleation of the prostate. Urol Int. 2007;79(1):50-54.
  9. Shimizu Y., Hiraoka Y., Iwamoto K. et al. Measurement of residual adenoma after transurethral resection of the prostate by transurethral enucleation technique. Urol Int. 2005;74(2):102-107.
  10. Mamoulakis C., Ubbink D.T., de la Rosette J.J. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Urol. 2009;56:798-809.
  11. Zhu G., Xie C., Wang X., Tang X. Bipolar plasmakinetic transurethral resection of prostate in 132 consecutive patients with large gland: Three-year follow-up results. Urology. 2012;79:397-402.
  12. Neyer M., Reissigl A., Schwab C. et al. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: Results of a comparative, prospective bicenter study - Perioperative outcome and long-term efficacy. Urol Int. 2013;90:62-67.
  13. Мартов А.Г., Лопаткин Н.А. Руководство по трансуретральной эндоскопической хирургии доброкачественной гиперплазии простаты.-М.,Триада Х. 1997. 144 с.
  14. Asimakopoulos A.D., Mugnier C., Hoepffner J.L. et al. The surgical treatment of a large prostatic adenoma - the laparoscopic approach -a systematic review. J. Endourology. 2012;26(8):960-967.
  15. Мартов А.Г., Максимов В.А., Керселян К.Э. и др. Вапоризация доброкачественной гиперплазии предстательной железы с помощью диодного лазера. Третий Российский конгресс по эндоурологии и новым технологиям. 2012; М.: Логос. С. 55-56.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies