Rehabilitation of patients with 107 «forgotten» stents


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The treatment of patients with large calculi, formed on both ends of the long-standing stent, remains difficult problem of modern urology. We observed 6 patients with long-term (16 to 24 months) standing stents. Large calculi on both ends of the drain were detected in 5 patients, fragmentation of stent - in 1 patient. Indication for stenting was ureteral calculus in 4 patients, staghorn stone of the left kidney in one pregnant woman 26 years old, and the stent was installed during orthotopic cystoplasty in 1 patient. At the first stage, contact laser lithotripsy of calculus on cystic end of the stent was performed, and distal portion was removed with forceps. 2-3 weeks after, PCNL was performed and renal end of the stent was removed. Patient with fragmentation of stent underwent ureteroscopy, and parts of the drainage were removed. To remove the stent, on average 1.8 endourological intervention was required. Results of operations in all cases were successful. Endourological operations are an effective method for the treatment of patients with large calculi, formed at both ends of the «forgotten» stents.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

B. K Komyakov

FSEI HPE «Northwestern State Medical University n.a. I.I. Mechnikov»

Department of Urology Head - Prof. St. Petersburg

B. G Guliev

FSEI HPE «Northwestern State Medical University n.a. I.I. Mechnikov»

Email: gulievbg@mail.ru
Prof. at the Department of Urology St. Petersburg

References

  1. Комяков Б.К., Гулиев Б.Г. Реканализация мочеточника. СПб., Диалект. 2011. 225 с.
  2. Аляев Ю.Г., Рапопорт Л.М., Руденко В.И. Внутреннее дренирование мочевых путей у больных нефролитиазом. М., 2003. 90 с.
  3. Chew B.H., Knudsen B.E., Denstedt J.D. The use of stents in contemporary urology. Curr. Opin. Urol. 2004; 14: 111-115.
  4. Joshi H.B., Stainthorpe A., Macdonagh R.P. et al. Indwelling ureteral stents: evaluation of symptoms, quality of life and utility. J. Urol. 2003; 169: 1065-1069.
  5. Slaton J.W., Kropp K.A. Proximal ureteral stent migration: An avoidable complication? J. Urol. 1996; 155: 58-61.
  6. Lynch M.F., Ghani K.R., Frost I., Anson K.M. Preventing the forgotten ureteric stent: results from the implementation on an electronic stent register. BJU Int. 2007; 99: 245-246.
  7. Shivde S.R., Joshi P., Jamkhandikar R. Extrusion of double J stent: A rare complication. Urology. 2008; 71: 814-815.
  8. Divakaruni N., Palmer C.J., Tek P. et al. Forgotten ureteral stents: Who's at risk? J. Endourol. 2013; 27 (8): 1051-1054.
  9. Monga M., Klein E., Castaneda-Zuniga W.R. et al. The forgotten indwelling ureteral stent: a urological dilemma. J. Urol. 1995; 153: 1817-1819.
  10. Borboroglu P.G., Kane C.J. Current management of severely encrusted ureteral stents with large associated stone burden. J.Urol. 2000; 164: 648-650.
  11. Bultitude M.F., Tiptaft R.C., Glass J.M. et al. Management of encrusted ureteral stents impacted in upper urinary tract. Urology 2003; 62 (4): 622-626.
  12. Tang V.C., Gillooly J., Lee E.W. et al. Ureteric stent card register - a 5-year retrospective analysis. Ann R. Coll. Surg. 2008; 90: 156-159.
  13. McCahy P.J., Ramsden P.D. A computerized ureteric stent retrieval system. Br. J. Urol. 1996; 77: 147-148.
  14. Ather M.H., Talati J., Biyabani R. Physician responsibility for removal om implants: the case for a computerized program for the tracking overdue double-stents. Tech. Urol. 2000; 6: 189-192.
  15. El-Faqih S.R., Shamsuddin A.B., Chakrabarti A. et al. Polyurethane internal stents in treatment of stone patients: morbidity related to indwelling times. J. Urol. 1991; 146: 1487-1491.
  16. Robert M., Boularan A.M., Sandid M. et al. Double-J ureteric stent encrustations: Clinical study on crystal formation on polyurethane stents. Urol. Int. 1997; 58: 100-104.
  17. Gertner J.M., Coutan D.R., Kliger A.S. et al. Pregnancy as state of physiologic absorptive hypercalciuria. Am. J. Med. 1986; 81: 451-456.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies