Laser lithotripsy


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The article describes the diverse methods of stone destruction in urolithiasis patients, including laser lithotripsy as the least traumatic and most efficient method of demolition of all types of urinary stones. Different types of lasers for intracorporeal lithotripsy have different mechanisms of stone fragmentation depending on the type of laser and its radiation parameters. The latest researches showed that new and promising laser modalities for lithotripsy are devices based on thulium (Tm) doped fiber laser, which can not only increase by several times the speed of the of stone fragmentation, but also minimizes the risks of surgical complications, due to the peculiarities of interaction between radiation and biological tissues.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

D. V Platonova

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Department and Clinic of Urology, Research Institute of Uronephrology and Human Reproductive Health

V. A Zamyatina

Scientific-Technical Association “IRE-Polus”

Email: vika_zam93@mail.ru

A. M Dymov

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Department and Clinic of Urology, Research Institute of Uronephrology and Human Reproductive Health

A. A Kovalenko

Scientific-Technical Association “IRE-Polus”

A. Z Vinarov

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Department and Clinic of Urology, Research Institute of Uronephrology and Human Reproductive Health

V. P Minaev

Scientific-Technical Association “IRE-Polus”

References

  1. Глыбочко П.В., Шалекенов Б.У. Лазеры в оперативной урологии. Алматы, 2014. 196 с.
  2. Koo V., Young M., Thompson T., Duggan B. Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi. BJU Int. 2011;108(11):1913-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.
  3. Глыбочко П.В., Аляев Ю.Г., Руденко В.И., Газимиев М.А., Беженар В.А. Акопян Г.Н. Сравнительная клиническая эффективность дистанционной и контактной уретеролитотрипсий». Саратовский научно-практический журнал. 2011;2:147.
  4. Grasso M. III. Intracorporeal lithotripsy.[Электронный ресурс]. 2011. URL: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/445341-overview#a03
  5. Laser and Laser Technology. European Association of Urology. 2011
  6. Jason K., Sprunger S., Herrel D. Techniques of ureteroscopy. Uro. Clin. N. Am. 2004;31:61-69.
  7. Звелто О. Принципы лазеров / Пер. под науч. ред. Т А. Шмаонова. 4-е изд. СПб.: Издательство «Лань». 2008. 720 с.
  8. Минаев В.П., Жилин К.М. Современные лазерные аппараты для хирургии и силовой терапии на основе полупроводниковых и волоконных лазеров. Рекомендации по выбору и применению. М.: Издатель И.В. Балабанов. 2009. 48 с.
  9. Iglesias Prieto. Contact lithotripsy. Advantages and disadvantages. Arch Esp Urol. 2001;54(9):885-893.
  10. Потемкин Ф.В., Мареев Е.И. Динамика распространения ударных волн и кавитационных пузырей в зависимости от энергии падающего сфокусированного фемтосекундного лазерного излучения. Ученые записки физического факультета. 2013;4:134401.
  11. Blackmon R.L., Case J.R., Trammell S.R., Irby P.B., Fried N.M. Fiber-optic manipulation of urinary stone phantoms using holmium:YAG and thulium fiber lasers. J. Biomed. Opt. 2013;18(2):28001.
  12. Ed. Schafer F.P.D ye lasers. Springer-Verlag. 1973, 285 p.
  13. Floratos D.L., de la Rosette J.J. Lasers in urology. BJU Int. 1999;84(2):204- 211.
  14. Дьяконов Г.И., Михайлов В.А. и др. Производительность разрушения камней под действием длинных импульсов излучения Ш:АИГ лазера. Препринт ИОФАН, 1992, № 23.
  15. Трансуретральная контактная лазерная уретеролитотрипсия с использованием лазерного хирургического комплекса «Лазурит». Медицинская технология ФС № 2008/271.
  16. Zorcher T., Hochberger J., Schrott K.M., Kuhn R., Schafhauser W. In vitro study concerning the efficiency of the frequency-doubled double-pulse Neodymium:YAG laser (ND:YAG) for lithotripsy of calculi in the urinary tract. Lasers Surg. Med. 1999;25(1):38-42.
  17. Грачев С.В., Джибладзе Т.А., Загородний Н.В., Зенгер В.Г., Зуев В.М., Исаев М.П., Ищенко А.И., Калинин В.С., Коздоба А.С., Лазко Ф.Л., Лялина В.В., Мазо Е.Б., Наседкин А.Н., Никитин А.А., Чепуров А.К., Чумаков Р.М., Шестаков А.В. Гольмиевый лазер в медицине. М.: «Триада-Х», 2003.
  18. Дьяконов Г.И., Михайлов В.А., Пак С.К., Суслов А.М., Федоровский С.Л., Щербаков И.А. ИСГГ:Cr:Er-лазер со светодиодной доставкой излучения для целей интракорпоральной литотрипсии. Квантовая электроника. 1993;20:2:194-197.
  19. Weber H.M., Miller K., Ruschoff J., Gschwend J., Hautmann R.E. Experimental results and initial clinical experiences with the alexandrite laser lithotripter. Urologe A. 1990;29(6):304-308.
  20. Fried N.M. Thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: an in vitro analysis of stone fragmentation using a modulated 110-watt Thulium fiber laser at 1.94 microm. Lasers Surg. Med. 2005;37(1):53-58.
  21. Vinnichenko A. Urinary stones fragmentation by short pulse Thulium fiber laser // 16th International Conference Laser Optics 2014. St. Petersburg, 2014.
  22. Yates J., Zabbo A., Pareek G. A comparison of the ND:YAG and holmium lasers during ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Lasers Surg. Med. 2007;39(8):637- 640.
  23. Kam Т.I. Special issue on lasers in biology and medicine / IEEE G. Quantum Electr. 1987;23:1701-1855.
  24. Corbin N.S., Teichman J.M., Nguyen T., Glickman R.D., Rihbany L., Pearle M.S., Bishoff J.T. Laser lithotripsy and cyanide. J Endourol. 2000;14(2):169-173.
  25. Pertusa C., Albisu A., Acha M., Blasco M., Llarena R., Arregui P. Lithotripsy with the alexandrite laser: our initial 100 clinical cases. Eur. Urol. 1991;20(4):269-271.
  26. Blackmon R.L., Irby P.B., Fried N.M. Holmium:YAG (lambda=2,120 nm) versus thulium fiber (lambda=1,908 nm) laser lithotripsy. Lasers Surg. Med. 2010;42(3):232-236.
  27. Lange B.I., Brendel T., Huttman G. Temperature dependence of light absorption in water at holmium and thulium laser wavelengths. Appl wavelengths Opt. 2002;416 5797-803.
  28. Lee H., Ryan R.T., Teichman J.M., Kim J., Choi B., Arakeri N.V., Welch A.J. Stone retropulsion during holmium:YAG lithotripsy. J Urol. 2003;169(3):881-885.
  29. Blackmon R.L., Case J.R., Trammell S.R., Irby P.B., Fried N.M. Fiberoptic Manipulation of Urinary Stone Phantoms Using Holmium: YAG and Thulium Fiber Lasers. Biomedical Optics. 2013;18(2):28001. doi: 10.1117/1. JBO.18.2.028001.
  30. Kiechle J.E., Maurice M.J., Ponsky Lee E. FACS Ureteroscopy and Laser Lithotripsy, UrologyBook. http://www.urologybook.com/ureteroscopy-and-laser-lithotripsy/
  31. Kumar A., Vasudeva P., Nanda B., Kumar N., Jha S.K., Singh H. A prospective randomized comparison between laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and semirigid ureteroscopy for upper ureteric stones >2 cm: A single center experience. J. Endourol. 2014.
  32. Jakobczyk B., Wrona M., Lipinski M., Rozanski W. Comparison of the effectiveness of crushing concrements in the urinary tract with the use of holmium laser and sonotrode. Cent. European. J. Urol. 2011;64(1):26-29.
  33. Rosini R., Teppa A., Tonini G., Aulenti V.A., Rad F.K., Tosana M. Comparison of low-power laser and ultrasound litotripsy in the management of middle-distal ureteral stones. Urologia. 2011 ;78(3):216-220.
  34. Degirmenci T., Gunlusoy B., Kozacioglu Z., Arslan M., Koras O., Arslan B., Minareci S. Comparison of Ho:YAG laser and pneumatic lithotripsy in the treatment of impacted ureteral stones: an analysis of risk. Kaohsiung. J. Med. Sci. 2014;30(3):153-158.
  35. Demir A., Cecen K., Karadag M.A., Bagcioglu M., Kocaaslan R., Sofikerim M. Flexible Ureterorenoscopy versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for the treatment of upper/middle calyx kidney stones of 10-20 mm: a retrospective analysis of 174 patients. Springerplus. 2014;3:557.
  36. Khalil M. Management of impacted proximal ureteral stone: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy with holmium: YAG laser. Urol. Ann. 2013;5(2):88-92.
  37. Kumar A., Vasudeva P., Nanda B., Kumar N., Das M.K., Jha S.K. A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Lower Caliceal Stones ≤2 cm: A Single-Center Experience. J Endourol. 2015;29(5):575-579. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0473
  38. Мартов А.Г., Гордиенко А.Ю., Москаленко С.А., Пенюкова И.В. Дистанционная и контактная уретеролитотрипсия в лечении крупных камней верхней трети мочеточника. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2013;2:82-85.
  39. Cui Y., Cao W., Shen H., Xie J., Adams T.S., Zhang Y., Shao Q. Comparison of ESWL and ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in management of ureteral stones. PloS. One. 2014;9(2):e87634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087634
  40. Cone E.B., Eisner B.H., Ursiny M., Pareek G. Cost-effectiveness comparison of renal calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy. J. Endourol. 2014;28(6):639-643.
  41. ГОСТ 12.1.040-83 «Лазерная безопасность. Общие положения»

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies