Monopolar transurethral enucleation of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Our initial experience


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Introduction. The choice of surgical treatment in patients with BPH is one of the most discussed issues in urology. In recent years, the surgical treatment of prostates of medium and large sizes by means of enucleation has become increasingly popular. Objective. The emergence of special loops to perform bipolar and monopolar enucleation using standard equipment for TURP has opened up new possibilities for the treatment of patients with BPH-transurethral monopolar enucleation BPH. Patients and methods. In the period from December 2014 to the current time 35 monopolar enucleations were performed in the clinic of urology Sechenov FMSMU. The mean age was 70,3±3,7 years; Prostate volume was 60,3±12,5 cm3; IPSS / Qol 24,6±3,3 / 5,1±1,1; Qsr 7.7±2.1 ml/s. We used resectoscope 26 Ch with constant irrigation, Hook-electrode, pusher-electrode, as well as a standard set of electrodes for mono- and bipolar surgery during the procedure. Enucleated adenomatous nodes were resected either by mono- or bipolar TURP and were laundered by Rene-Alexander syringe, or morcellated. Results. Comparative analysis of different methods of surgical treatment of prostatic hyperplasia (laser and monopolar enucleation) shows the advantages of monopolar enucleation in patients with prostatic hyperplasia. Conclusion. Monopolar enucleation of prostate hyperplasia is a radical, as well as a safe and effective surgical method in the treatment of patients with BPH. Further observation of the operated patients will allow us to make a final conclusion about the place of this technique in the treatment of patients with BPH and adequacy of data.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

D. G Tsarichenko

RI for UroNephrology, Sechenov FMSMU. Russian Federation

Email: tsarichenkodg@yandex.ru

R. R Simberdeev

RI for UroNephrology, Sechenov FMSMU. Russian Federation

Email: sherman_ben@mail.ru

P. V Glybochko

RI for UroNephrology, Sechenov FMSMU. Russian Federation

Email: rektorat@mma.ru

Y. G Alyaev

RI for UroNephrology, Sechenov FMSMU. Russian Federation

Email: ugalyaev@mail.ru

L. M Rapoport

RI for UroNephrology, Sechenov FMSMU. Russian Federation

R. B Sukhanov

RI for UroNephrology, Sechenov FMSMU. Russian Federation

Email: rb_suhanov@mail.ru

N. I Sorokin

RI for UroNephrology, Sechenov FMSMU. Russian Federation

Email: nisorokin@mail.ru

D. V Enikeev

RI for UroNephrology, Sechenov FMSMU. Russian Federation

Email: enikeev_dv@mail.ru

D. S Davydov

RI for UroNephrology, Sechenov FMSMU. Russian Federation

Email: ares9999@mail.ru

References

  1. Mamoulakis C., Skolarikos A., Schulze M., et al. Results from an international multicentre double-blind randomized controlled trial on the perioperative efficacy and safety of bipolar vs monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate. BJU int. 2012;109:240-248.
  2. Elmansy H.M., Kotb A., Elhilali M.M. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: Long-term durability of clinical outcomes and complication rates during 10 years of followup. J. Urol. 2011;186:1972-1976.
  3. Gilling P.J., Wilson L.C., King C.J., Westenberg A.M., Frampton C.M., Fraundorfer M.R. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate: results at 7 years BJU Int. 2012;109(3):408-411.
  4. Tan A., Liao C., Mo Z. et al. Meta-analysis of holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection for symptomatic prostatic obstruction. Br J. Surg. 2007;94:1201-1208.
  5. Kuntz R.M., Lechrich K., Ahyai S.A. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100 grams: 5-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial. Eur Urol. 2008; 53: 160-166.
  6. Мартов А.Г., Максимов В.А., Яровой С.Ю. и др. Трансуретральная гольмиевая энуклеация аденомы предстательной железы. Урология. 2011;1: 38-43
  7. Asimakopoulos A.D., Mugnier C., Hoepffner J.L. et al. The surgical treatment of a large prostatic adenoma - the laparoscopic approach-a systematic review. J. End urology. 2012;26(8):960-967.
  8. Севрюков Ф.А., Сорокин Д.А., Карпухин И.В. и др. Трансуретральная энуклеация предстательной железы (TUEB) - новый метод биполярной эндоскопической хирургии ДГПЖ. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2012;2: 34-36
  9. Hiraoka Y., Shimizu Y., Iwamoto K., Takahashi H., Abe H. Trial of complete detachment of the whole prostate lobes in benign prostate hyperplasia by transurethral enucleation of the prostate. Urol Int. 2007;79(1):50-54.
  10. Shimizu Y., Hiraoka Y., Iwamoto K., Takahashi H., Abe H. Measurement of residual adenoma after transurethral resection of the prostate by transurethral enucleation technique. Urol Int. 2005;74(2):102-107.
  11. Mamoulakis C., Ubbink D.T., de la Rosette J.J. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Eur Urol. 2009;56:798-809.
  12. Мартов А.Г., Лопаткин Н.А. Руководство по трансуретральной эндоскопической хирургии доброкачественной гиперплазии простаты. М., Триада Х. 1997. 144 с.
  13. Мартов А.Г., Ермаков Д.В., Андронов А.С.,Бойков Н.А. Трансуретральная электроэнуклеация доброкачественной гиперплазии предстательной железы. Урология. 2014;5: 95-101

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies