Comparative effectivenesss of standard antibiotic therapy and Canephron N asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Current international and Russian clinical guidelines recommend treating asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy to prevent acute gestational pyelonephritis. At the same time, the growing resistance of uropathogens and the risks associated with antibiotic therapy in pregnancy dictate the need to limit the use of antibiotics and seek alternative approaches to antibacterial therapy. Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis was performed on 60 pregnant women who received either a standard antibiotic regimen (n=32) or the herbal preparation Canephron N (n=28). The primary outcomes were the incidence of symptomatic infections (cystitis or pyelonephritis), premature birth and low birth weight delivery, and incidence of persistent/ recurrent bacteriuria. Results. In the group of antibiotic therapy, one patient developed cystitis and three had pyelonephritis; in the Canephron N group, cystitis occurred in one patient, no pyelonephritis cases were observed. Among the whole study cohort (n=60), the incidence of symptomatic infections and pyelonephritis was 8.3 and 5.0%, respectively. The incidence of symptomatic infections (cystitis, pyelonephritis) did not differ statistically significantly between the study groups (p=0.2157). There were three and one premature births in the group of antibiotic therapy and the Canephron N group, respectively (p=0,373), and two low birth weight deliveries in each group (p=0.891). Recurrent bacteriuria was registered in 17 patients from the group of antibiotic therapy and in three in the Canephron N group (p=0.0006). Conclusions. The management of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy using Canephron N is not inferior to standard antibiotic therapy regarding the incidence of symptomatic infection, premature birth, and low birth weight delivery. Persistent/recurrent bacteriuria was more common in women receiving the antibiotic therapy.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

K. L Lokshin

Clinical hospital «Lapino»

Email: Россия;e-maü: k_lokshin@hotmail.com
Dr.Med.Sci., Head of the Department of Urology

References

  1. Kogan M.I., Naboka Y.L., Ibishev K.S., Gudima I.A., Naber K.G. Human Urine Is Not Sterile-Shift of Paradigm. Urol. Int. 2015;94(4):445-452.
  2. Siddiqui H., Nederbragt A.J., Lagesen K., Jeansson S.L., Jakobsen K.S. Assessing diversity of the female urine microbiota by high throughput sequencing of 16S RNA amplicons. BMC Microbiol. 2011;11:244-251.
  3. Cai T., Mazzoli S., Mondaini N., Meacci F., Nesi G., D’Elia C., Malossini G., Boddi V., Bartoletti R. The role of asymptomatic bacteriuria in young women with recurrent urinary tract infections: to treat or not to treat? Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55(6):771-777. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis534.
  4. EAU Guidelines 2018. http://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/EAU-Guidelines-on-Urological-Infections-2018-large-text.pdf
  5. Gold E.M., Traub F.B., Daichman I., Terris M. Asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1966;27(2):206-209.
  6. Kass E.H. Pyelonephritis and bacteriuria. A major problem in preventive medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1962;56:46-53.
  7. Kincaid-Smith P, Bullen M. Bacteriuria in Pregnancy. Lancet. 1965;1(7382):395-399.
  8. Little P.J. The incidence of urinary infection in 5000 pregnant women. Lancet. 1966;2(7470):925-928.
  9. Mulla N. Bacteriuria in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1960;16:89-92.
  10. Pathak U.N., Tang K., Williams L.L., Stuart K.L. Bacteriuria of pregnancy: results of treatment. J Infect Dis. 1969;120(1):91-103.
  11. Robertson J.G., Livingstone J.R., Isdale M.H. The managment and complications of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy. Report of a study on 8,275 patients. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1968;75(1):59-65.
  12. Thomsen A.C., Morup L., Hansen K.B. Antibiotic elimination of group-B streptococci in urine in prevention of preterm labour. Lancet. 1987;1(8533):591-593.
  13. Williams G.L., Campbell H., Davies K.J. Urinary concentrating ability in women with asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy. Br Med J. 1969;3(5664):212-215.
  14. Wren B.G. Subclinical renal infection and prematurity. Med J Aust. 1969;2(12):596-600.
  15. Kazemier B.M., Koningstein F.N., Schneeberger C., Ott A., Bossuyt P.M., de Miranda E., Vogelvang T.E., Verhoeven C.J., Langenveld J., Woiski M., Oudijk M.A., van der Ven J.E., Vlegels M.T., Kuiper P.N., Feiertag N., Pajkrt E., de Groot C.J., Mol B.W., Geerlings S.E. Maternal and neonatal consequences of treated and untreated asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy: a prospective cohort study with an embedded randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15(11):1324-1333. Doi: 10.1016/ S1473-3099(15)00070-5.
  16. Naber K.G., Alidjanov J.F. Are there alternatives to antimicrobial therapy and prophylaxis of uncomplicated urinary tract infections? Urologiia. 2014;(6):5-8:10-13.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies