Robot-assisted pelvic floor reconstruction: review and own experience
- Authors: Sukhikh S.O1, Kolontarev K.B1, Vasilyev A.O1, Pushkar D.Y.1
-
Affiliations:
- A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
- Issue: No 6 (2018)
- Pages: 139-143
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/1728-2985/article/view/296438
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18565/urology.2018.6.139-143
- ID: 296438
Cite item
Abstract
Full Text
About the authors
S. O Sukhikh
A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Email: docsukhikh@gmail.com
Ph.D. student of the Department of Urology
K. B Kolontarev
A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Email: kb80@yandex.ru
Dr.Med.Sci., Professor at the Department of Urology
A. O Vasilyev
A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Email: alexvasilyev@me.com
PhD, Assistant at the Department of Urology
D. Yu Pushkar
A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and DentistryCorr.-Member of the RAS, Dr.Med.Sci., Prof., Head of the Department of Urology
References
- Wu J.M., Hu«dley A.F., Fulto« R.G., et al. Forecasting the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in U.S. Women: 2010 to 2050. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(6):1278-1283.
- Shull B.L., Be«« S.J., Kuehl T.J. Surgical management of prolapse of the anterior vaginal segment: an analysis of support defects, operative morbidity, and anatomic outcome. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1994;171:1329-1336.
- Nussler E., Kesmodel U.S., Lofgre« M., et al. Operation for primary cystocele with anterior colporrhaphy or non-absorbable mesh: patient-reported outcomes. Int. Urogynecology J. 2015;26(3):359-366.
- Maher C., Fei«er B, Baessler K., et al. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;10:CD012376.
- Wu J.M., Hu«dley A.F., Fulto« R.G., et al. Forecasting the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in U.S. Women: 2010 to 2050. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(6):1278-1283.
- Shull B.L., Be«« S.J., Kuehl T.J. Surgical management of prolapse of the anterior vaginal segment: an analysis of support defects, operative morbidity, and anatomic outcome. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1994;171:1329-1336.
- Nussler E., Kesmodel U.S., Lofgre« M., et al. Operation for primary cystocele with anterior colporrhaphy or non-absorbable mesh: patient-reported outcomes. Int. Urogynecology J. 2015;26(3):359-366.
- Nygaard I.E., McCreery R., Brubaker L., et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet. Gynecol. 2004;104(4):805-823.
- Grimes C.L., Lukacz E.S., Ga«tz M.G., et al. What happens to the posterior compartment and bowel symptoms after sacrocolpopoexy? Evaluation of 5-year outcomes from E- Care. Female Pelvic Med. Reconstr. Surg. 2014;20(5):261-266.
- Govorov A.V., Vasilyev A.O., Kolontarev K.B., Pushkar D.Yu. Robotic technologies in urology. Consilium medicum. 2014; 7:5-7. Russian
- Vasiliev A.O., Govorov A.V., Dyakov V.V., Rasner P.I., Kolontarev K.B., Maltsev E.G., Pushkar D.Yu. Modern possibilities of robotic technologies: the experience of the urology clinic at MSUMD. Pharmatec. Special issue. 2016; s1-16:44-47. Russian
- Maher C.F., Qatawneh A.M., Dwyer P.L., et al. Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2004;190(1):20-26.
- Braun H.F., Fernandez M., Dell’Oro A., et al. Prospective randomized study to compare colposacropexy and Mayo McCall technique in correction of severe genital central prolapse (abstract). Int. Urogynecology J. 2007;18.
- Wang L.C., Awamlh B.A., Hu J.C., et al. Trends in Mesh Use for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair from the Medicare Database. Urology. 2015;86(5):885-891.
- Lane F.E. Repair of posthysterectomy vaginal-vault prolapse. Obstet. Gynecol. 1962;20:72-77.
- Tan J.S., Lukacz E.S., Menefee S.A., et al. Determinants of vaginal length. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2006;195(6):1846-1850.
- Freeman R.M., Pantazis K., Thomson A., et al. A randomized controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. Int. Urogynecology J. 2013;24(3):377-384.
- Geller E.J., Siddiqui N.Y., Wu J.M., et al. Short-term outcomes of robotic sacral colpopexy compared with abdominal sacral colpopexy. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008;112(6):1201-1206.
- Nosti P.A., Umoh U., Kane S., et al. Outcomes of minimally invasive and Abdominal sacral colpopexy: a Fellows' Pelvic Research Network Study (abstract). Female Pelvic Med. Reconstr. Surg. 2012;18.
- Ramm O., Kenton K. Robotics for Pelvic Reconstruction. Current bladder dysfunction reports. 2011;6(3):176-181.
- Daneshgari F., Paraiso M.F., Kaouk J., Govier F.E., Kozlowski P.M., Kobashi K.C. Robotic and laparoscopic female pelvic floor reconstruction. BJU Int. 2006;98(Suppl. 1):62-68.
- Fox S.D., Stanton S.L. Vault prolapse and rectocele: assessment of repair using sacrocolpopexy with mesh interposition. BJOG. 2000;107(11):1371-1375.
- Brown B.N., Mani D., Nolf A.L., et al. Characterization of the host inflammatory response following implantation of prolapse mesh in rhesus macaque. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015;213(5):668.
- Propst K., Tunitsky137Bitton E., Schimpf M.O., et al. Pyogenic spondylodiscitis associated with sacral colpopexy and rectopexy: report of two cases and evaluation of the literature. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2014;25(1):21-31.
- Anand M., Woelk J.L., Weaver A.L., et al. Perioperative complications of robotic sacrocolpopexy for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2014;25(9):1193-200.
- Paraiso M.F., Jelovsek J.E., et al. Laparoscopic Compared With Robotic Sacrocolpopexy for Vaginal Prolapse. Obstetrics & gynecology. 2011 ; 118 : 1005-1013.
- Serati M., Bogani G., Sorice P., et al. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur. Urol. 2014; 66(2):303-318.
- Paraiso M.F., Jelovsek J.E., Frick A., et al. Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacral colpopexy for vaginal prolapse. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011;118(5):1005-1013.
- Clifton M.M., Goldman H.B. Erosion of prolene sutures into the bladder after abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2015;26(12):187-156.
- Elliott D.S., Chow G.K., Gettman M. Current status of robotics in female urology and gynecology. World J. Urol. 2006;24(2):188-192.
- Germain A., Thibault F., Galifet M., et al. Long-term outcomes after totally robotic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Surg. Endosc. 2013;27(2):525-529.
- Chan S.S., Pang S.M., Cheung T.H., Cheung R.Y., Chung T.K. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse: with or without robotic assistance. Hong Kong Med. J. 2011;17(1):54-60.
- Siddiqui N.Y., Geller E.J., Visco A.G. Symptomatic and anatomic 1-year outcomes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012;206(5):435.
- Seror J., Yates D.R., Seringe E., et al. Prospective comparison of short-term functional outcomes obtained after pure laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. World J. Urol. 2012;30(3):393-398.
- Tan-Kim J., Menefee S.A., Luber K.M., Nager C.W., Lukacz E.S. Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: comparing operative times, costs and outcomes. Female Pelvic Med. Reconstr. Surg. 2011;17(1):44-49.
- Antosh D.D., Grotzke S.A., McDonald M.A., et al. Short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic sacral colpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012;18(3): 158-161.
- Awad N., Mustafa S., Amit A., et al. Implementation ofa new procedure: laparoscopic versus robotic sacrocolpopexy. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2013;287(6):1181-1186.
- Popov A.A. et al. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted sakrocolpoppeksy. Functional results. Archive of Obstetrics and Gynecology, V.F. Snegireva. 2016 ; 4:44-45. Russian