The current status of surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with volume over 80 сс


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

According to European Association of Urology (EAU), an open simple prostatectomy, holmium laser and bipolar enucleation represent current standard methods for surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with volume over 80 ml. The transurethral resection of prostate, thulium laser enucleation and laser vaporization are second-line methods. In addition, some novel interventions are currently being developing. The aim of our work was to systematize all current procedures for more convenient use in clinical practice.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

R. G Biktimirov

Federal Clinical Center for HMT; A.I. Burnazyan SRC FMBC, FMBA of Russia

Email: rafbik@kb119.ru
Ph.D., Head of the Department of Urology; associate professor at the Department of Urology and Andrology

A. G Martov

A.I. Burnazyan SRC FMBC, FMBA of Russia

Email: ФГБУ ГНЦ ФМБЦ им.А.И.Бурназяна ФМБА России. Москва. Россия; e-mal: martovalex@mail.ru
MD, professor, Head of the Department of Urology and Andrology

T. R Biktimirov

Federal Clinical Center for HMT; A.I. Burnazyan SRC FMBC, FMBA of Russia

Email: ва. Россия; e-mal: Gabastm@mail.ru
urologist; Ph.D. student at the Department of Urology and Andrology

A. A Kaputovskij

Federal Clinical Center for HMT; A.I. Burnazyan SRC FMBC, FMBA of Russia

Email: kaputovsky79@maiI.ru
urologist; Ph.D. student at the Department of Urology and Andrology

References

  1. Gravas S. (Chair), Bach T., Bachmann A., Drake M., Gacci M., Gratzke C., Madersbacher S., Mamoulakis C., Tikkinen K.A.O. Guidelines on the Management of Non-Neurogenic Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS), incl. Benign Prostatic Obstruction (BPO). European Association of Urology 2016. http://uroweb.org/wp-content/upIoads/ EAU-GuideIines-Non-Neurogenic-MaIe-LUTS_LR.pdf
  2. Лопаткин Н.А., Лоран О.Б., Мартов А.Г. Руководство по урологии. М., 1998 г., Т. 3. 470 с.
  3. Лидский А. Т. Позадилобковая аденомэктомия. Астраханский медицинский журнал. 1923:10-12
  4. Millin T. Retropubic prostatectomy. Lancet. 1945;2:639-696.
  5. Хинман Ф. Оперативная урология. Атлас. М., Геотар-Медиа. 2007. 429 с.
  6. Bourque J.P. Transvesico-capsular prostatic adenomectomy. Urol.Int. 1957;4:65.
  7. Сергиенко Н.Ф. Чреспузырная экстрауретральная аденомэктомия. Урология и нефрология. 1979;2:30-34
  8. Хинман Ф. Оперативная урология. Атлас. М.: Геотар-Медиа. 2007. С. 436-437.
  9. Лопаткин Н.А., Лоран О.Б., Мартов А.Г. Руководство по урологии. М., 1998, Т. 3. 472 с.
  10. Walsh P.C., Oesterling J.E. Improved hemostasis during simple retropubic prostatectomy. J. Urol. 1990;143(6):1203-1204.
  11. Nesrallah L., Srougi M., Henrique A. Tecnica hemostatica de Gregoir-Walsh en prostatectomia retropubica: experiencia preliminary. J. Bras. UroI. 1993;19(1):141-144.
  12. Amen-Palma J.A., Arteaga R.B. Hemostatic technique: extracapsular prostatic adenomectomy. J. Urol. 2001;166(4):1364-1367.
  13. Пивоваров П.И., Гурский Б.Ф., Максимов В.Д., Горовой В.И. Методика гемостаза при внепузырной позадилобковой аденомэктомии. Урология и нефрология. 1991;2:37- 40
  14. Srougi M., Dall’oglio M.F., Bomfim A.C. et al. An improved technique for controIIing bIeeding during simpIe retropubic prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2003;92(7):813-817.
  15. Filiadis I., Adamopoulos V., Konstandinidis E. Modification of retropubic adenomectomy: improved hemostasis and outcome. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2007;39(1):169-172.
  16. Veliev E.I., Sokolov A.E., Bogdanov A.B., Iliushin L.V. Modified method of retropubic prostatectomy (RMAPE method).UroIogiia. 2012;(4):65-68. PMID: 23116026
  17. Переверзев А.С., Сергиенко Н.Ф. Аденома предстательной железы. Киев, 1998. С. 197-198
  18. Gratzke C., et al. Complications and early postoperative outcome after open prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic enlargement: results of a prospective multicenter study. J. Urol. 2007;177:1419.
  19. Лопаткин Н.А., Лоран О.Б., Мартов А.Г. Руководство по урологии. М., 1998 г., Т. 3. 475 с.
  20. Dall’Oglio M.F., Srougi M., Antunes A.A. at al. An improved technique for controlling bleeding during simple retropubic prostatectomy: a randomized controIIed study. BJU Int. 2006;98(2):384-387. PMID: 16879682 doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06236.x
  21. Лопаткин Н.А., Лоран О.Б., Мартов А.Г. Руководство по урологии. М., 1998, Т. 3. 475 с.
  22. Переверзев А.С., Сергиенко Н.Ф. Аденома предстательной железы. Киев, 1998. С. 197-198
  23. Chapple C.R., McConnell J., Tubaro A., editors. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: current therapy. London, UK: Martin Dunitz Ltd; 2000.
  24. Reich O. et al. Morbidity, mortaIity and earIy outcome of transurethraI resection of the prostate: a prospective multicenter evaluation of 10654 patients. J. Urol. 2008;180(1):246-249.
  25. Мартов А.Г., Лопаткин Н.А. Руководство по трансуретральной эндоскопической электрохирургии доброкачественной гиперплазии простаты. М.: Изд-во «Триада-Х», 2006. 144 с.). 25. Issa M.M. Technological advances in transurethral resection of the prostate: bipolar versus monopolar TURP. J. Endourol. 2008;22:1587.
  26. Rassweiler J. et al. Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate - technical modifications and early clinical experience. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2007;16:11.
  27. Burke N. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of transurethral resection of the prostate versus minimaIIy invasive procedures for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction. Urology. 2010;75:1015.
  28. Mamoulakis C. et al. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Urol. 2009;56:798.
  29. Omar M.I. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of bipolar compared with monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). BJU Int. 2014;113:24.
  30. Cornu J.N. et al. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Functional Outcomes and CompIications FoIIowing TransurethraI Procedures for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms ResuIting from Benign Prostatic Obstruction: An Update. Eur Urol. 2015;67:1066.
  31. Burke N. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of transurethral resection of the prostate versus minimaIIy invasive procedures for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction. Urology. 2010;75: 1015.
  32. Mamoulakis C. et al. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Urol. 2009;56:798.
  33. Cornu, J.N., et al. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Functional Outcomes and CompIications FoIIowing TransurethraI Procedures for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms ResuIting from Benign Prostatic Obstruction: An Update. Eur Urol. 2015;67:1066.
  34. Autorino R. et al. Four-year outcome of a prospective randomised trial comparing bipolar plasmakinetic and monopolar transurethraI resection of the prostate. Eur Urol. 2009;55:922.
  35. Komura K. et al. Incidence of urethral stricture after bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate using TURis: results from a randomised trial. BJU Int. 2015;115:644.
  36. Akman T. et al. Effects of bipolar and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate on urinary and erectile function: a prospective randomized comparative study. BJU Int. 2013;111:129.
  37. Mamoulakis C. et al. Bipolar vs monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: evaIuation of the impact on overaII sexuaI function in an international randomized controlled trial setting. BJU Int. 2013;112:109.
  38. Hiraoka Y., Lin T., Tsuboi N., Nakagami Y. Transurethral enucleation of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Nihon Ika Daigaku Zasshi. 1986;53(2): 212-215.
  39. Hiraoka Y., Akimoto M. Transurethral enucleation of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J. Urol. 1989;42(5):1247-1250.
  40. Hiraoka Y. Transurethral endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP). World J. Urol. 2017;35(10):1629-1630.
  41. Kuntz R.M. Laser treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. World J. Urol. 2007;25(3):241-247.
  42. Gilling P.J., Cass C.B., Cresswell M.D., Fraundorfer M. R. Holmium laser resection of the prostate: preliminary results of a new method for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology. 1996;47(1):48-51.
  43. Teichmann H. O., Herrmann T. R., Bach T. Technical aspects of lasers in urology. World J. Urol. 2007;25(3):221-225.
  44. Fraundorfer M.R., Gilling P.J. HoImium:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate combined with mechanical morcellation: preliminary results. Eur Urol. 1998;33(1):69-72.
  45. Myong Kim, Hahn-Ey Lee. Technical Aspects of Holmium Laser EnucIeation of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic HyperpIasia. Korean J. UroI. 2013;54(9): 570-579.
  46. Rapoport L.M., Sorokin N.I., Sukhanov R.B. En bloc holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP EN BLOC): our experience. UroIogiia. 2018;(3):83-87.
  47. Martov A.G., Ergakov D.V., Andronov A.S., Bakov N.A. Transurethral eIectroenucIeation of benign prostatic hyperpIasia. UroIogiia. 2014;(5):95- 101.
  48. Tooher R. et al. A systematic review of holmium laser prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J. Urol. 2004;171:1773.
  49. Westenberg A. et al. Holmium laser resection of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results of a randomized trial with 4-year minimum long-term followup. J. Urol. 2004;172:616.
  50. Tan A. et al. Meta-analysis ofholmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for symptomatic prostatic obstruction. Br J. Surg. 2007;94:1201.
  51. Yin L. et al. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Endourol. 2013;27:604.
  52. Lourenco T. et al. Alternative approaches to endoscopic ablation for benign enlargement of the prostate: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2008;337:a449.
  53. Hirasawa Y., Ide H., Yasumizu Y., Hoshino K. Comparison of transurethral enucleation with bipolar and transurethral resection in saline for managing benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int. 2012;110(11 Pt C):E864-9.
  54. Kuntz R.M. et al. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100 grams: 5-year follow-up results of a randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol. 2008;53(1):160-166. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17869409 292.
  55. Li M., Qiu J., Hou Q. at al. Endoscopic enucleation versus open prostatectomy for treating large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0121265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121265.
  56. Lin Y., Wu X., Xu A., Ren R. at al. Transurethral enucleation of the prostate versus transvesical open prostatectomy for large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J. Urol. 2016;34(9): 1207-1219. Doi: 10.1007/ s00345-015-1735-9. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
  57. Enikeev D.V., Glybochko P.V., Alyaev Y.G. al. al. Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of various techniques of endoscopic prostate enucleation in a single center. Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2017;(11):4-14. Doi: 10.17116/ hirurgia2017114-14.
  58. Herrmann T.R., Bach T., Imkamp F., Georgiou A., Burchardt M., Oelke M., Gross A. J. Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP): transurethral anatomical prostatectomy with laser support. Introduction of a novel technique for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction. World J. Urol. 2010;28(1):45-51.
  59. Kyriazis I., Swiniarski P.P., Jutzi S., Wolters M., Netsch C., Burchardt M., Liatsikos E., Xia S., Bach T., Gross A.J., Herrmann T.R. Transurethral anatomical enucleation of the prostate with Tm:YAG support (ThuLEP): review of the literature on a novel surgical approach in the management of benign prostatic enlargement. World J. Urol. 2015;33(4):525-530.
  60. Zhang F., Shao Q., Herrmann T. R., Tian Y., Zhang Y. Thulium laser versus holmium laser transurethral enucleation of the prostate: 18-month follow-up data of a single center. Urology. 2012;79(4):869-874.
  61. Gross AJ., Netsch C., Knipper S., Holzel J., Bach T. Complications and early postoperative outcome in 1080 patients after thulium vapoenucleation of the prostate: results at a single institution. Eur Urol. 2013;63(5):859-867.
  62. Enikeev D.V., Glybochko P.V., Alyaev Y.G. al. all. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP) for small, large and giant prostatic hyperplasia. Practice guidelines. Experience of more than 450 surgeries. Urologiia. 2016;(4):63-69. PMID: 28247728.
  63. Feng L., Zhang D., Tian Y., Song J. Thulium Laser Enucleation Versus Plasmakinetic Enucleation of the Prostate: A Randomized Trial of a Single Center. J. Endourol. 2016;30(6):665-670.
  64. Ustinov D.V., Kholtobin D.P., Kul’chavenia E.V. The use of laser vaporization for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urologiia. 2013;(4):74-76, 78-79.
  65. Al-Ansari A. et al. GreenLight HPS 120-W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized clinical trial with midterm follow-up. Eur Urol. 2010;58:349.
  66. Alivizatos G., Skolarikos A., Chalikopoulos D., Papachristou C., Sopilidis O., Dellis A., Kastriotis I., Deliveliotis C. Transurethral Photoselective Vaporization versus Transvesical Open Enucleation for Prostatic Adenomas >80 ml: 12-mo Results of a Randomized Prospective Study. Eur Urol. 2008;54(2):427-437.
  67. Ruszat R. et al. Safety and Effectiveness of Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate (PVP) in Patients on Ongoing Oral Anticoagulation. Eur Urol. 2007;51(4):1031-1041.
  68. Chung D.E., Wysock J.S., Lee R.K., Melamed S.R., Kaplan S.A., Te A.E. Outcomes and Complications After 532 nm Laser Prostatectomy in Anticoagulated Patienolumets With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. J. Urol. 2011;186(3):977-981.
  69. Mariano M.B. et al. Laparoscopic prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia--a six-year experience. Eur Urol. 2006;49(1):127-131.
  70. Castillo O., Vidal-Mora I., Rodriguez-Carlin A., Silva A., Schatloff O. Modified urethrovesical anastomosis during robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: Technique and results. Prostate Int. 2016;4(2):61-64.
  71. Oktay B., Koc G., Vuruskan H., Danisoglu M.E., Kordan Y. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal simple prostatectomy for benign prostate hyperplasia: a two-year experience. Urol J. 2011;8(2):107-112.
  72. Lucca I., Shariat S.F., Hofbauer S.L., Klatte T. Outcomes of minimally invasive simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J. Urol. 2015;33(4):563-570. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1324-3.
  73. Xie J.B., Tan Y.A., Wang F.L., Xuan Q., Sun Y.W., Xiao J., Zhu Y.P., Zhou L.Y. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic adenomectomy (Madigan) versus bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia greater than 80 ml: complications and functional outcomes after 3-year follow-up. J. Endourol. 2014;28(3):353-359. Doi: 10.1089/ end.2013.0374.
  74. Umari P., Fossati N., Gandaglia G., and al. Robotic Assisted Simple Prostatectomy (RASP) versus Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) for lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with large volume prostates (>100 ml): a comparative analysis from a high-volume center. J. Urol. 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.08.114.
  75. Orlov I.N., Popov S.V., Martov A.G., Gallyamov E.A. Comparative assessment of treatments for prostate adenoma greater than 100 cm3. Urologiia. 201;(6):82-86. PMID: 29376601 134.
  76. Pariser J.J., Pearce S.M., Patel S.G., Bales G.T. National Trends of Simple Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With an Analysis of Risk Factors for Adverse Perioperative Outcomes. Urology. 2015;86(4):721- 755. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.06.048.
  77. Corica A.P. et al. A novel temporary prostatic stent for the relief ofprostatic urethral obstruction. BJU Int. 2004. 93: 346.
  78. Guazzoni G. et al. A modified prostatic UroLume Wallstent for healthy patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: a European Multicenter Study. Urology. 1994;44:364.
  79. Vanderbrink B.A. et al. Prostatic stents for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Curr Opin Urol. 2007;17:1.
  80. Armitage J.N. et al. Epithelializing stent for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review of the literature. J. Urol. 2007;177:1619.
  81. Armitage J.N. et al. The thermo-expandable metallic stent for managing benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review. BJU Int. 2006; 98:806.
  82. McNicholas T.A. et al. Minimally invasive prostatic urethral lift: surgical technique and multinational experience. Eur Urol. 2013;64:292.
  83. Roehrborn C.G., Gange S.N., Shore N.D. et al. The Prostatic Urethral Lift for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Associated with Prostate Enlargement Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: The L.I.F.T. Study. J. Urol. 2013;190(6):2161 -2167.
  84. Uflacker A. et al. Meta-Analysis of Prostatic Artery Embolization for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. J. Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(1):1686- 1697.
  85. Teoh JY., Chiu P.K. et al. Prostatic artery embolization in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review. Int Urol Nephrol. 2017;49(2):197-203. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1461-2.
  86. Bhatia S., Sinha V.K., Harward S., Gomez C., Kava B.R., Parekh D.J. Prostate Artery Embolization in Patients with Prostate Volumes of 80 mL or More: A Single-Institution Retrospective Experience of 93 Patients. J. Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018;29(10):1392-1398.
  87. Неймарк А.И., Тачалов М.А. и соавт. Рентгенэндоваскулярная хирургия в лечении пациентов с доброкачественной гиперплазией и раком предстательной железы. Урология. 2017;1:54-60. Doi: https:// dx.doi.org/10.18565/urol.2017.1.54-60
  88. Jeong C.W., Park Y.H., Ku J.H., Kwak C., Kim H.H. Minimally invasive management of postoperative bleeding after radical prostatectomy: transarterial embolization. J. Endourol. 2010;24(9):1529-1533.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies