PREVENTION OF BLEEDING DURING TUBELESS PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Introduction. Nephrostomy tube placed after percutaneous removal of kidney stones can cause pain and discomfort in the early postoperative period [1, 2]. A tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is considered as alternative approach. However, the most serious complication after tubeless procedure is a development of active uncontrolled bleeding from percutaneous tract in the early postoperative period. Aim. To improve the results of surgical treatment of kidney stones by evaluation of efficiency of using hemostatic matrix during tubeless PCNL. Materials and methods. A total of 113 patients with large kidney stones undergone to the tubeless PCNL for the past 9 years in our clinic. The external or internal stent was put for the drainage of upper urinary tract for 2 and 14 days, respectively. All patients were divided into 2 groups, depending on severity of bleeding (group 1 - no bleeding vs. group 2 - mild bleeding). Each group was further divided into two subgroups based on the technique and type of drainage of upper urinary tract at the end of the surgery. In the main group (n=74) the hemostatic matrix based on lyophilized thrombin 2000 IU was injected in percutaneous tract at the end of the surgery. The control group included 39 patients who underwent mini-PCNL without using hemostatic matrix. The blood loss, intensity of urine leakage from percutaneous tract (duration, visual analog scale) and degree of fluid extravasation in pararenal fat estimated by US were evaluated. Results. The mean operative time was 47.5±3.6 min (52, 58, 38 and 49 min in subgroup I, II, III and control group, respectively). Hemoglobin drop was 9.3±4.1, 12.1±7.5, 14.6±11.2 and 10.6±5.9 in subgroups I, II, III and in the control group, respectively, while duration of hematuria was 16.1, 20.3, 28.5 and 22.9 hours, respectively. Fluid extravasation in pararenal space was found in 1 out 7 patients in subgroup III and control group, respectively (p<0.05). The dilatation of collection system (after double-J) persisted in 18.1%, 20% 22.2% and 13.3% cases in subgroup I, II, III and control group, respectively. There were no significant differences in other evaluated parameters. In 1 case in the control group there was severe bleeding which required selective embolization of the renal artery. Conclusion. The use of hemostatic matrix is an additional important measure which allows to prevent active bleeding from the percutaneous tract in early postoperative period. Moreover, the hemostatic matrix contributes to the sealing of tract and reduces the risk of fluid extravasation in pararenal space after mini-PCNL.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

D. S Merinov

National Medical Research Radiologioal Center

Email: d.merinov@gmail.com
Ph.D., Head of the Department of Endourology of N.A. Lopatkin Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology - branch Moscow, Russia

S. S Gurbanov

National Medical Research Radiologioal Center

Email: gurbanovsh@gmail.com
Ph.D., senior researcher at the Department of Endourology of N.A. Lopatkin Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology - branch Moscow, Russia

A. V Artemov

National Medical Research Radiologioal Center

Email: artie@mail.ru
Ph.D., researcher at the Department of Endourology, Head of the operating unit of N.A. Lopatkin Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology - branch Moscow, Russia

L. D Arustamov

National Medical Research Radiologioal Center

Email: endourology@mail.ru
Ph.D., researcher at the Department of Endourology of N.A. Lopatkin Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology - branch Moscow, Russia

V. A Epishov

National Medical Research Radiologioal Center

Email: val-epishov@yandex.ru
Ph.D., urologist at the Department of Urology №1 of N.A. Lopatkin Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology - branch Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Paul E.M., Marcovich R., Lee B.R., Smith A.D. Choosing the ideal nephrostomy tube. BJU Int. 2003;92:672-677.
  2. Pietrow P.K., Auge B.K., Lallas C.D. et al. Pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: impact of nephrostomy tube size. J Endourol. 2003;17:411-414.
  3. Turk C., Petrik A, Sarica K., Seitz C., Skolarikos A., Straub M. et al. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69:475-482.
  4. Fernström I., Johannson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1976;10:257-259.
  5. Merinov D.S., Pavlov D.A., Gurbanov S.S., Fatikhov R.R., Epishov V.A., Svangiradze I.A. Our 5-year experience of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with large and staghorn kidney stones. Eksperimental’naya i klinicheskaya urologiia. 2014;2.
  6. Wein A.J., Kavoussi L.R., NovickA.C., et al. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders. 2012. Р. 1325-1356.
  7. European Association of Urology Guidelines, Arnhem, The Netherlands, 2015. P. 19-20.
  8. Teodorovich O.V., Naryshki« S.A., Borise«ko G.G., Davlatbiev S.A., Dalgatov S.Yu., Shatokhi« M.N., Kudil’ A.V., Kochiev D.G. Minimally-invasive percutaneous laser nephrolithotomy for treatment of staghorn stones. Medicinskyi vestnik Bashkortostana. 2015; 10(3):68-72.
  9. Rogachikov V.V., Nesterov S.N., Il’che«ko D.N., Tevli« K.P., Kudryashov A.V.Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: past, present and future. Eksperimental’naya i klinicheskaya urologiia. 2016;2:58-66.
  10. Гулиев Б.Г., Стецик Е.О. Перкутанная нефролитотрипсия под ультразвуковым контролем. Материалы 1-й научно-практической конференции урологов Северо-Западного федерального округа РФ с международным участием «Актуальные вопросы урологии». Урологические ведомости. 2015;V(1):97.
  11. Али С.Х., Григорьев Н.А., Али Х.М. Ультрамини-перкутанная нефролитотрипсия. Медицинский вестник Башкортостана. 2015;10(3):254-256.
  12. Komyakov B.K., Guliev B.G. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in supine position. Urologiia. 2012;4:60-64.
  13. Гаджиев Н.К., Григорьев В.Е., Мазуренко Д.А., Малхасян В.А., Обидняк В.М., Писарев А.В., Тагиров Н.С., Попов С.В., Петров С.Б. Перкутанная нефролитотрипсия при сложных формах камней почек: структурное биомоделирование. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2016;3:6-51).
  14. Попов С.В., Орлов И.Н., Обидняк В.М., Малевич С.М., Борычев М.В., Басок С.М., Гаджиев Н.К., Тагиров Н.С., Писарев А.В., Малхасян В.А., Мазуренко Д.А. Роль местной анестезии для снижения болевого синдрома после перкутанной нефролитотрипсии. Педиатр. 2016;7(4):113-118).
  15. Shah H.N., Kausik V.B., Hegde S.S. et al. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective feasibility study and review of previous reports. BJU Int. 2005;96:879-883.
  16. Ra«a A.M., Mithani S. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: call of the day. J Endourol. 2007;21:169-172.
  17. Mouracade P., Spie R., La«g H., et al. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what about replacing the Double-J stent with a ureteral catheter? J Endourol. 2008;22:273-275.
  18. Аляев Ю.Г., Григорьев Н.А. Первый опыт безнефростомной чрескожной нефролитотрипсии. Урология. 2012;5:102-104).
  19. Сагалевич А.И., Возианов С.А., Джуран Б.В., Когут В.В., Гайсенюк Ф.З., Мариниченко М.В. Бездренажная перкутанная нефролитотрипсия - новое направление в эндохирургии нефролитиаза. Урологія=Урология. 2016;20(3(78) 26-30).
  20. Мартов А.Г., Гущин Б.Л., Меринов Д.С., Ергаков Д.В., Павлов ДА, Шеховцов С.Ю., Карагужин С.Г., Лисенок АА Эндоскопические и рентгеноэндоскопические технологии в урологии. Урология. 2004;1:54-57.
  21. Меринов Д.С., Павлов Д.А., Фатихов Р.Р., Епишов В.А. На передовых рубежах развития минимальноинвазивной урологии в России. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2012;4:108).
  22. Меринов Д.С., Павлов Д.А., Фатихов Р.Р., Епишов В.А., Гурбанов Ш.Ш., Артемов А.В. Минимально-инвазивная перкутанная нефролитотрипсия: деликатный и эффективный инструмент в лечении крупных камней почек. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2013;3:94-99).
  23. Crook T.J., Lockyer C.R., Keogha«e S.R. et al. Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2008;22:267-72.
  24. Crook T.J., Lockyer C.R., Keogha«e S.R. et al. A randomized controlled trial of nephrostomy placement versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol. 2008;180:612-14.
  25. Borges C.F., Frego«esi A., Silva D.C., et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of nephrostomy placement versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2010;24:1739-1746.
  26. Bellman G.C., Davidoff R., Candela J., Gerspach, J., Kurtz S., Stout L. Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol 1997;157:1578-1582.
  27. Yoon G.H., Bellman G.C. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A new standard in percutaneous renal surgery. J EndoUrol. 2008;22:1865-1867.
  28. Sofer M., Lidawi G., Kere«-Paz G., Yehiely R., Beri A., Matzkin H. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: first 200 cases in Israel.Isr Med Assoc J. 2010;12(3):164-167.
  29. Ista«bulluoglu M.O., Ozturk B., Go«e« M., Cicek T., Ozkardes H. Effectiveness of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients: a prospective randomized study. Int Urol Nephrol. 2009;41: 541-545.
  30. Журавлев В.Н., Данилов В.О., Баженов И.В., Берестецкий И.Е., Борзунов И.В., Вахлов С.Г., Макарян А.А. Перкутанная нефролитотрипсия: алгоритм действий при выявлении кровотечения из почечных сосудов. Уральский медицинский журнал. 2016;1(134):10-13.
  31. Баженов И.В., Вахлов С.Г., Данилов В.О., МакарянА.А., Бурцев С.А., Чернышов С.Д., Кочмашев И.В., Шерстобитов В.Е., Берестецкий И.Е. Применение суперселективной эмболизации почечных сосудов при кровотечениях после перкутанной нефролитотрипсии у больных мочекаменной болезнью. Уральский медицинский журнал. 2013; 9(114):21-25).
  32. Arun K. Srinivasan, Zeph Okeke & Arthur D. Smith: Exit Strategy After Percutaneous Renal Surgery: Drainage and Hemostasis. Smith’s Textbook of Endourology 3rd Ed 2012. P. 326-333.
  33. Mikhail A.A., Kaptein J.S., Bellma« G.C. Use of fibrin glue in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology. 2003;61:910-914.
  34. Aghamir S.M., Khazaeli M.H., Meisami A. Use of Surgicel for sealingnephrostomytract after totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2006;20(5):293-295.
  35. Ziaee S.A., Sarha«g«ejad R., Abolghasemi H., Eshghi P., Radfar M.H., Aha«ia« A., Kardoust Parizi M., Amirizadeh N., Nouralizadeh A. Autologous fibrin sealant in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy; a prospective study. Urol J. 2013;10(3):999-1003.
  36. Koo K.C., Park S.U., Ja«g H.S, Ho«g C.H. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy with non-absorbable hemostatic sealant (Quikclot®) versus nephrostomy tube placement: a propensity score-matched analysis. Urolithiasis. 2015.
  37. Abbott J.E., Cicic A., Jump R.W. 3rd, Davalos J.G. Hemostatic plug: novel technique for closure of percutaneous nephrostomy tract. J Endourol. 2015;29(3):263-269.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2019 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies