Bilateral acute purulent destructive pyelonephritis after retrograde ureteroscopy and lithotripsy


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The problem of urinary stone disease and acute destructive pyelonephritis remains to be relevant in the current urologic practice. The acute pyelonephritis is the most common infectious and inflammatory complication after retrograde ureteroscopy. According to data of leading urologists in Russian Federation and worldwide, the incidence of acute purulent pyelonephritis ranges from 0.1 to 0.2%. Infectious and inflammatory complications of retrograde ureteroscopy often require urgent interventions. Acute pyelonephritis can result in destructive changes in the renal parenchyma. In case of ineffective conservative measures, pyelonephritis can progress into sepsis with the development of multiple organ failure. Therefore, infectious and inflammatory complications require to start combined antibacterial, anti-inflammatory and detoxification therapy, as well as to resolve any upper urinary tract obstruction. If acute pyelonephritis leads to destructive phase with a formation of a carbuncle or an abscess in the kidney, an open surgery is indicated. Despite being minimally-invasive, retrograde ureteroscopy can lead to serious complications requiring an open surgical intervention. In some cases, the severity of the patient’s condition may require nephrectomy.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

V. V Bazaev

GBUZ Moscow district “Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute named after M.F. Vladimirsky

Email: vvbazaev@rambler.ru

V. V Dutov

GBUZ Moscow district “Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute named after M.F. Vladimirsky

Email: valeriy.dutov.52@mail.ru

S. B Urenkov

GBUZ Moscow district “Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute named after M.F. Vladimirsky

Email: urenkov.sb@gmail.com

E. A Mamedov

GBUZ Moscow district “Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute named after M.F. Vladimirsky

Email: Elvin_mammadli@mail.ru

D. V Romanov

GBUZ Moscow district “Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute named after M.F. Vladimirsky

Email: urology.ru@mail.ru

A. A Podoynicyn

GBUZ Moscow district “Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute named after M.F. Vladimirsky

Email: a9251252261@gmail.com

References

  1. Мартов А.Г. Место суправезикальной эндоурологии в современном комплексном лечении мочекаменной болезни. Урология и нефрология. 1994;6:5-9
  2. Базаев В.В., Уренков С.Б., Мамедов Э.А. Оперативно-пластическая коррекция осложнений контактной уретеролитотрипсии. Учебное пособие. 2016. 28 с.
  3. Гудков А.В., Бощенко В.С., Петлин А.В., Афонин В.Я. и др. Ретроградная контактная электроимпульсная литотрипсия. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2011;4:49-53
  4. Гончарова Ю.М., Кузьменко В.В., Кузьменко А.В. Перспективные направления в лечении острого пиелонефрита (обзор литературы). Вестник новых медицинских технологий. 2012;19(2):34-37
  5. Рощин Ю.В. Уретероскопия и ее осложнения у больных с уретеролитиазом. Университетская клиника. 2013;9(2):196-200
  6. Сорокин Н.И. Современные аспекты профилактики, диагностики и коррекции осложнений чрескожной хирургии нефролитиаза. Автореф. дисс. канд. мед. наук. М., 2006. С. 6-12
  7. Grasso M., Bagley D. Small diameter, actively deflectable, flexible ureteropyeloscopy. J. Urol. 1998;160(5):1648-1654.
  8. Hollenbeck B.K., Schuster T.G., Faerber G.J., Wolf J.S. Comparison of outcomes of ureteroscopy for ureteral calculi located above and below the pelvic brim. Urology. 2001;58(3):351-355.
  9. Georgescu D., Multescu R., Geavlete B., Geavlete P. et al. Intraoperative complications after 8150 semirigid ureteroscopies for ureteral lithiasis: risk analysis and management. Chirurgia. 2014;109(3):369-374.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies