Surgical approaches for implanting of three-piece penile prosthetics


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Implantation of three-piece penile prosthesis is a gold standard in patients with severe erectile dysfunction. Currently, three surgical approach (scrotal, suprapubic and subcoronal) are used for prosthetic implantation. A method of implantation for three-piece penile prosthesis is still under discussion. The literature dedicated to an influence of surgical approach on the results of implantation for three-piece penile prosthesis in patients with severe erectile dysfunction is reviewed. The advantages and drawbacks of each technique are mentioned.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

N. D. Akhvlediani

A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Email: nikandro@mail.ru
MD, professor at the Department of Urology Moscow, Russia

A. S Chernushenko

A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

urologist at the Urologic Department of University Clinic Moscow, Russia

D. Yu Pushkar

A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

academician of RAS, MD, professor, Head of the Department of Urology, Chief urologist of the Ministry of Health of Russia and Moscow Moscow, Russia

A. N Bernikov

A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Ph.D., Head of the Urologic Department of University Clinic, associate professor at the Department of Urology Moscow, Russia

I. A Reva

A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Ph.D., urologist at the Urologic Department of University Clinic Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Scott F.B., Bradley W.E., Timm G.W. Management of erectile impotence. Use of implantable inflatable prosthesis. Urology. 1973;2(1):80-82.
  2. Васильева Е.Е., Истранов А.Л., Адамян Р.Т. Фаллопротезирование: история и развитие. Авдрология и генитальная хирургия. 2014;2:23-29
  3. Montague D.K., Angermeir K.W. Surgical approaches for penile prosthesis implantation: penoscrotal vs infrapubic. Int J Impot Res. 2003;5:134-135. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901089.
  4. Small M.P., Carrion H.M., Gordon J.A. Small-Carrion penile prosthesis: new implant for management of impotence. Urology. 1975;5(4):479-486.
  5. Small M.P. Small-Carrion penile prosthesis: a report on 160 cases and review of the literature. J Urol. 1978;119(3):365-368.
  6. Levine L.A., Becher E.F., Bella A.J.,Brant. W. O., Kohler T.S., Martinez-Salamanca J.I, Trost L Morey A.F. Penile Prosthesis Surgery: Current Recommendations From the International Consultation on Sexual Medicine. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2016;13(4):489-518. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.017.
  7. Gupta N.K., Ring J., Trost L, Wilson S.K., Kohler T.S. The penoscrotal surgical approach for inflatable penile prosthesis placement. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6:628-638. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.07.32.
  8. Wilson S.K., Kohler T.S., Gupta N.K. Pearls, Perils and Pitfalls of Penile Protesis Surgery P. 71-84.
  9. Barrett D.M., Furlow W.L. Penile prosthesis implantation. In: Segraves R.T., Schoenberg H.W. editors. Diagnosis and Treatment of Erectile Disturbances: A Guide for Clinicians. New York: Plenum Medical Book Co. 1985. P. 219-240.
  10. Graydon R.J. Berlin B.B. Improved pump placement with infrapubicpenile prosthetic implantation. J Urol. 1992;148:102-103.
  11. Perito P.E. Minimally invasive infrapubic inflatable penile implant. J Sex Med. 2008;5(4):27-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00682.x.
  12. Perito P.E. Ectopic reservoir placement-No longer in the space of Retzius. J Sex Med. 2011;8(9):2395-2398. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02430.x.
  13. Mulcahy J.J., Brant M.D., Ludlow J.K. Management of infected penile implants. Tech Urol. 1995;1(3):115-119.
  14. Mellon M.J., Broghammer J.R., Henry G.D. The Mulcahy Salvage: Past and Present Innovations. J Sex Med. 2015;12(Suppl 7):432-436. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12986.
  15. Zhivov A.V., Plehanov A.Ju, Veliev E.I. Current principles of the treatment of prosthetic infection and their use in penile implantation surgery. Klinicheskaja mikrobiologija i antimikrobnaja himioterapija. 2007;9(3):279-283. Russian (Живов А.В., Плеханов А.Ю., Велиев Е.И. Современные принципы лечения протезной инфекции и их применение в имплантационной хирургии полового члена. Клиническая микробиология и антимикробная химиотерапия. 2007;9(3):279-283).
  16. Candela J.V., Hellstrom W.J. Three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: a comparison of the penoscrotal and infrapubic surgical approaches. J La State Med Soc. 1996;148:296-301.
  17. Garber B.B., Marcus S.M. Does surgical approach affect the incidence of inflatable penile prosthesis infection? Urology. 1998;52:291-293.
  18. Wilson S.K. Rear tip extender sling: a quick and easy repair for crural perforation. J Sex Med. 2010;7(3):1052-1055. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01733.x.
  19. Stember D.S., Kohler T.S., Morey A.F. Management of Perforation Injuries During andFollowing Penile Prosthesis Surgery. J Sex Med. 2015;12(Suppl. 7):456-461. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12997.
  20. Garber B.B. Inflatable penile prosthesis: site-specific malfunction analysis. Int J Impot Res. 2003;15:22-25. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900942
  21. Antonini G, Busetto G.M., De Berardinis E, et al. Minimally invasive infrapubic inflatable penile prosthesis implant for erectile dysfunction: evaluation of efficacy, satisfaction profile and complications. Int J Impot Res. 2016;28:4-8. doi: 10.1038/ijir.2015.33.
  22. Mulcahy J.J. Distal corporoplasty for lateral extrusion of penile prosthesis cylinders. J Urol. 1999;161:193.
  23. Mulcahy J.J. The Prevention and Management of Noninfectious Complications of Penile Implants. Sex Med Rev. 2015;3(3):203-213.
  24. Karpman E, Bella A, Brant W, et al. Outcomes of IPP placement by surgical approach, penoscrotal vs infrapubic, results from a prospective multicenter study. J Urol 2015;193:569-570. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.1086
  25. Vollstedt A, Gross M.S., Antonini G, et al. The infrapubic surgical approach for inflatable penile prosthesis placement. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6:620-627. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.07.14
  26. Warren J.W. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Int. J. Antimicrob Agents.2001;17:299-303.
  27. Akhvlediani N.D., Matyuhov I.P., Allenov S.N. A prevention of urinary disturbances in patients undergoing penile prosthesis implantation. Medicinskij sovet. 2016;5:91- 93. doi: 10.21518/2079-701X-2016-05-91-93.
  28. Kramer A., Chason J. Residents at the University of Maryland Medical System provide insight to learning infrapubic approach for IPP surgery: relative benefits but novel challenges exposed in first 15 cases. J Sex Med. 2010;7:1298-1305. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01588.x.
  29. Weinberg A.C., Pagano M.J., Deibert C.M., Valenzuela, R.J. Sub-Coronal Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement With Modified No-Touch Technique: A Step-byStep Approach With Outcomes. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2016;13:270-
  30. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2015.12.016.
  31. Eid J.F. Surgical Techniques. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2011 ;8:5-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02137.x
  32. Morey A.F. Re: Sub-coronal inflatable penile prosthesis placement with modified no-touch technique: a step-by-step approach with outcomes. J Urol. 2016;196:1518-1519.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies