Two-layer posterior reconstruction of the vesicourethral anastomosis during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy


Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

Aim. To study the influence of the technique of posterior reconstruction of the vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) on the prevention of urinary incontinence after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Material and methods. A total of 67 patients (mean age 63 years) with localized prostate cancer were included in the study. All patients were divided into two groups. In the group 1 (n=32) the standard technique of the VUA was used, while in the group 2 (n=35) the two-layer posterior reconstruction was done. The impact of urinary incontinence on the quality of life was analyzed using the ICIQ-SF questionnaire 1, 3 and 6 months after operation. On postoperative days 5-7, all patients underwent cystography to assess the tightness of the VUA. Results. One month after RARP in the group 1 the mean score of ICIQ-SF questionnaire was 6.72, compared to 4.57 in group 2 (p=0.04). After 3 and 6 months the respective values were 3.8 vs. 2.3 (p=0.09) and 1.94 vs. 1.2 (p=0.23), respectively. Cystography revealed no extravasation of the contrast. Conclusion. The results of a retrospective comparative study suggest that a two-layer posterior reconstruction of the VUA during RARP, being a simple method, provides better continence rate one month postoperatively compared to standard technique, although larger randomized clinical trials are needed.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

M. Kodzokov

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: kodzokov-m@mail.ru
3-year Ph.D. student, Institute for Urology and Human Reproductive Health

E. Spot

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: shpot@inbox.ru
professor, Head of the Department of Oncourology, Institute for Urology and Human Reproductive Health

A. Proskura

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: proskura777@yandex.ru
physician of the Department of Oncourology, Institute for Urology and Human Reproductive Health

E. Gazimiev

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

6-year student

A. Damiev

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: damievakhmed@mail.ru

M. Gazimiev

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: gazimiev@yandex.ru
Ph.D., MD, professor, Deputy Director on Science of the Institute for Urology and Human Reproductive Health; Director of National Medical Research Center of Urology

Bibliografia

  1. Аляев Ю.Г., Безруков Е.А., Крупинов Г.Е. Выбор метода лечения при локализованном и местнораспространенном раке предстательной железы. Врачебное сословие. 2007;5:45-49
  2. Нестеров С.Н., Страт А.А. Робот-ассистированная радикальная простатэктомия в лечении клинически локализованного рака предстательной железы (обзор литературы). Онкоурология. 2012;8(3):80-87
  3. Алексеев Б.Я. Лечение локализованного и местно распространенного рака предстательной железы: диссертация докт. мед. наук. М., 2006. 259 с.
  4. Sandoval Salinas C., Gonzalez Rangel A.L., Catano Catano J.G., Fuentes Pachon J.C., Castillo Londono J.S. Efficacy of robotic-assisted prostatectomy in localized prostate cancer: a systematic review of clinical trials. Adv Urol. 2013;2013:105651-105656.
  5. Голубцова Е.Н., Томилов А.А., Велиев Е.И. Влияние вариантов реконструкции уретровезикального анастомоза при выполнении радикальной простатэктомии на восстановление функции удержания мочи. Consilium Medicum. 2018;20(7):26-29
  6. Перепечай В.А., Димитриади С.Н., Алексеев Б.Я. Способ раннего восстановления континенции при радикальной простатэктомии. Клиническая практика. 2011;2(1):35-40
  7. Freire M.P., Weinberg A.C., Lei Y., et al. Anatomic bladder neck preservation during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of technique and outcomes. Eur Urol 2009; 56:972-980.
  8. Tewari A., Jhaveri J., Rao S., et al. Total reconstruction of the vesicourethral junction. BJU Int 2008; 101:871-877.
  9. Asimakopoulos A.D., Annino F., D’Orazio A., et al. Complete periprostatic anatomy preservation during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP): the new pubovesical complex-sparing technique. Eur Urol 2010; 58:407-417.
  10. Stolzenburg J.U., Liatsikos E.N., Rabenalt R., et al. Nerve sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy - effect of puboprostatic ligament preservation on early continence and positive margins. Eur Urol 2006; 49:103-111.
  11. Rocco B., Gregori A., Stener S., et al. Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter allows a rapid recovery of continence after transperitoneal videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2007; 51:996-1003.
  12. Ko Y.H., Coelho R.F., Chauhan.S., et al. Factors affecting return of continence 3 months after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis from a large, prospective data by a single surgeon. J. Urol 2012; 187:190-194.
  13. Kojima Y., Hamakawa T., Kubota Y., et al. Bladder neck sling suspension during robotassisted radical prostatectomy to improve early return of urinary continence: a comparative analysis. Urology 2014;83:632-639.
  14. Patel V.R., Coelho R.F., Palmer K.J., et al. Periurethral suspension stitch during robotassisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes. Eur Urol 2009; 56:472-478.
  15. Student V.Jr., Vidlar A., Grepl M., et al. Advanced reconstruction of vesicourethral support (ARVUS) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: One-year functional outcomes in a two-group randomised controlled trial. Eur Urol 2017;71:822-830.
  16. Lee D.I., Wedmid A., Mendoza.P., et al. Bladder neck plication stitch: a novel technique during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy to improve recovery of urinary continence. J. Endourol 2011; 25:1873-1877.
  17. Menon M., Muhletaler F., Campos M., et al. Assessment of early continence after reconstruction of the periprostatic tissues in patients undergoing computer assisted (robotic) prostatectomy: results of a 2 group parallel randomized controlled trial. J. Urol 2008;180:1018-1023.
  18. Coelho R.F., Chauhan S., Orvieto M.A., et al. Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2011;59:72-80.
  19. Gondo T., Yoshioka K., Hashimoto T., et al. The powerful impact of doublelayered posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction on early recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J. Endourol 2012;26:1159-1164.
  20. Joshi N., de Blok W., van Muilekom E., et al. Impact of posterior musculofascial reconstruction on early continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective parallel group trial. Eur Urol 2010;58:84-89.
  21. Sutherland D.E., Linder B., Guzman A.M., et al. Posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction during robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a phase II randomized clinical trial. J. Urol 2011;185:1262-1267.
  22. Jeong C.W., Lee J.K., Oh J.J., et al. Effects of new 1-step posterior reconstruction method on recovery of continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: results of a prospective, single-blind, parallel group, randomized, controlled trial. J. Urol 2015;193:935-942.
  23. Brien J.C., Barone B., Fabrizio M., et al. Posterior reconstruction before vesicourethral anastomosis in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy leads to earlier return to baseline continence. J. Endourol 2011;25:441-445.
  24. Grasso A.A., Mistretta F.A., Sandri M., et al. Posterior musculofascial reconstruction after radical prostatectomy: an updated systematic review and a meta-analysis. BJU Int 2016;118:20-34.
  25. Guillonneau B., Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris experience. J. Urol 2000;163:418-422.
  26. Kojima Y., Takahashi N., Haga N., et al. Urinary incontinence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: pathophysiology and intraoperative techniques to improve surgical outcome. Int J. Urol 2013;20:1052-1063.
  27. Rocco F., Carmignani L., Acquati P. et al. Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J. Urol 2006; 175:2201-2206.
  28. Seckiner I., Yesilli C., Mungan N.A., Aykanat A., Akduman B. Correlations between the ICIQ-SF score and urodynamic findings. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(4):492-494.
  29. Haga N., Ogawa S., Yabe M., et al. Factors Contributing to early recovery of urinary continence analyzed by pre- and postoperative pelvic anatomical features at robotassisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J. Endourol 2015; 29:683-690.
  30. Rocco F., Gadda F., Acquati P., et al. Personal research: reconstruction of the urethral striated sphincter. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2001;73:127-137.
  31. Rocco F., Rocco B. Anatomical reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2009;104:274-281.
  32. Burnett A.L., Mostwin J.L. In situ anatomical study of the male urethral sphincteric complex: relevance to continence preservation following major pelvic surgery. J. Urol 1998; 160:1301-1306.
  33. Rocco B., Cozzi G., Spinelli M.G., et al. Posterior musculofascial reconstruction after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 2012; 62:779-790.
  34. Porpiglia F., Bertolo R., Manfredi M., De Luca S., Checcucci E., Morra I., Passera R., Fiori C. Total Anatomical Reconstruction During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Implications on Early Recovery of Urinary Continence. Eur Urol. 2016 Mar; 69(3):485-495.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar

Declaração de direitos autorais © Bionika Media, 2021