Risk factors of developing lymphogenic complications after radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Introduction. Prostate cancer (PCa) is very common and real problem in oncourology. The main treatment for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer is radical prostatectomy (RP). Performing RP with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in patients with intermediate and high cancer risk may be associated with an increased risk of developing lymphogenic complications, such as: lymphedema, prolonged lymphorrhea, and the formation of lymphatic cysts (LC). Purpose: to assess the impact of risk factors on the development of lymphogenic complications after RP with PLND. Materials and methods. From January 2017 to March 2020 at the N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University on the basis of N.I. Pirogov City Clinical Hospital No. 1 of the Moscow Healthcare Department were performed 203 RPs with PLND, of which retropubic RPs (RRP) without the formation of peritoneal flap in 101 patients, RRP with the formation of peritoneal flap in 51 patients, laparoscopic RP (LRP) also in 51 patients. All operations were performed by different surgeons. Univariate comparisons and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to compare and define independent risk factors for lymphogenic complications. Results. 85 patients (41,9%) out of 203 developed lymphogenic complications, such as symptomatic LC developed in 13 (6,4%), and asymptomatic LC in 38 (18,7%), prolonged lymphorrhea was observed in 25 (12,3%), lymphedema in 9 patients (4,4%). The incidence of lymphogenic complications was higher in the group with RRP without the formation of peritoneal flap in 53 patients compared to RRP with the formation of a peritoneal flap in 18 patients and LRP in 14 patients (53 compared to 32; p=0,028). Extended PLND compared with standard PLND was also one of the risk factors for the development of lymphogenic complications (55 compared to 30; p<0,001). Patients with lymphogenic complications had a larger number of lymph nodes removed (17 compared to 13; p=0,004). Age, body mass index, prostate volume, pTN, Gleason score, time of surgery, blood loss during surgery, the presence or absence of percutaneous drainage did not show a significant statistical difference. In a multivariate analysis extended PLND, the number of lymph nodes removed, and RRP without the formation of peritoneal flap remained the independent predictors of lymphogenic complications. Conclusions. In our study, RRP without the formation of peritoneal flap, extended PLND, and the number of lymph nodes removed, are significantly associated with a high risk of developing lymphogenic complications.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

S. V Kotov

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia; N.I. Pirogov City Clinical Hospital № 1 of the Moscow Healthcare Department

Email: urokotov@yandex.ru
MD, professor, head of Department of Urology and Andrology

A. O Prostomolotov

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia; N.I. Pirogov City Clinical Hospital № 1 of the Moscow Healthcare Department

Email: artem.prostomolotov@mail.ru
postgraduate at the Department of Urology and Andrology

A. A Nemenov

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia; N.I. Pirogov City Clinical Hospital № 1 of the Moscow Healthcare Department

Email: nemenov.a@mail.ru
senior assistant ofDepartment ofUrology and Andrology

References

  1. Лоран О.Б., Велиев Е.И., Котов С.В. Онкологические результаты радикального хирургического лечения пациентов с местно-распространенным раком предстательной железы. Онкоурология. 2009,3:29-34
  2. Crawford E.D., Batuello J.T., Snow P., et. al. The use of artificial intelligence technology to predict lymph node spread in men with clinically localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 2000 May 1 ;88(9) :2105-2109. PMID: 10813722. doi: 10.1002/(sici) 1097-0142(20000501)88:9<2105::aid-cncr16>3.0.co;2-3.
  3. Mottet N., Bellmunt J., Bolla M., et. al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur. Urol. 71(4):618-629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.003
  4. Briganti A., Chun F.K., Salonia A., et al. Complications and other surgical outcomes associated with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with localized prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 2006;50:1006-1013. PMID: 16959399. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.08.015.
  5. Capitanio U., Pellucchi F., Gallina A., et al. How can we predict lymphorrhoea and clinically significant lymphoceles after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy? Clinical implications. BJU Int. 2011; 107(7): 1095-1101. PMID: 20880192. Doi: 10.1111/j. 1464-410X.2010.09580.x.
  6. Orvieto M.A., Coelho R.F., Chauhan S., et al. Incidence of lymphoceles after robot-assisted pelvic lymph node dissection. BJU Int. 2011; 108(7): 1185-1190. PMID: 21489117. Doi: 10.1111/j. 1464-410X.2011.10094.x.
  7. Раснер П.И., Котенко Д.В., Пушкарь Д.Ю., и др. Осложнения робот-ассистированной радикальной простатэктомии и факторы риска их возникновения. Вестник Национального медикохирургического Центра им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2015,10(1):45-50
  8. Thomas C., Ziewers S., Thomas A., et al. Development of symptomatic lymphoceles after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection is independent of surgical approach: a single-center analysis. International Urology and Nephrology. 2019;51(4):633-640. PMID: 30796729. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02103-7.
  9. Mundhenk J., Hennenlotter J., Alloussi S., et al. Influence of body mass index, surgical approach and lymphadenectomy on the development of symptomatic lymphoceles after radical prostatectomy. Urol. Int. 2013;90(3):270-276. PMID: 23548783. doi: 10.1159/000347043.
  10. Porpiglia F., Terrone C., Tarabuzzi R., et. al. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience of a single center. Urology. 2006;68(2):376-380. PMID: 16904456. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.02.039.
  11. Chung J.S., Kim W.T., Ham W.S., et al. Comparison of Oncological Results, Functional Outcomes, and Complications for Transperitoneal Versus Extraperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Single Surgeon’s Experience. Journal of endourology. 2011;25(5):787-792. PMID: 21114412. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0222.
  12. Stolzenburg J.U., Wasserscheid J., Rabenalt R., et. al. Reduction in incidence of lymphocele following extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection by bilateral peritoneal fenestration. World journal of urology. 2008;26(6):581-586. PMID: 18777125. doi: 10.1007/s00345-008-0327-3.
  13. Mattei A., Fuechsel F.G., Bhatta Dhar N., et al. The template of the primary lymphatic landing sites of the prostate should be revisited: results of a multimodality mapping study. Eur. Urol. 2008 Jan;53:118-125. PMID: 17709171. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.07.035.
  14. Musch M., Klevecka V., Roggenbuck U., et al. Complications of pelvic lymphadenectomy in 1,380 patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy between 1993 and 2006. J. Urol. 2008 Mar;179(3):923- 928. PMID: 18207170. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.10.072.
  15. Thomas C., van de Plas J., Tsaur I., et al. Incidence, risk factors and management of symptomatic lymphoceles after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urol. Pract. 2017 Nov;4(6):493-498. Doi: 10.1016/j. urpr.2016.11.003.
  16. Weingartner K., Ramaswamy A., Bittinger A., et. al. Anatomical basis for pelvic lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer: results of an autopsy study and implications for the clinic. J. Urol. 1996;156(6):1969-1971. PMID: 8911367. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65406-5.
  17. Bochner B.H., Cho D., Herr H.W., et. al. Prospectively packaged lymph node dissections with radical cystectomy: evaluation of node count variability and node mapping. J. Urol. 2004;172(4 Pt 1): 1286-1290. PMID: 15371825. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000137817.56888.d1.
  18. Danuser H., Di Pierro G.B., Stucki P., et. al. Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy and various radical prostatectomy techniques: is pelvic drainage necessary? BJU Int. 2013; 111(6):963-969. PMID: 23356829. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11681.x.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2021 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies