ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS AND RISK FACTORS FOR COMPLICATION OF PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLOTOTRIPSIA IN PATIENTS WITH A SOLITARY KIDNEY


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Relevance. Management of patients with large and staghorn stones of a solitary kidney is widely debated among urologists and has not been sufficiently investigated, which determined the relevance of this study. Materials and methods. The study comprised 80 patients with large (>20 mm) and staghorn stones of an anatomically or functionally solitary kidney. Of them, 58 patients underwent percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PNL), and 22 had open surgery. The criterion of the treatment effectiveness was the complete stone clearance or small residual fragments sized less than 3 mm. The safety criterion was the absence of intra- and postoperative complications, according to Clavien-Dindo grading system. The study analyzed the following factors influencing the effectiveness and safety of PNL: the number of accesses; nephroscope diameter; use of a nephroscope sheath; type of lithotripter; size, density, type and composition of the stone. Results. Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy demonstrated statistically significantly better safety results compared with open surgery with comparable effectiveness. Long-term stone recurrence rate after PNL and open surgery was 10.4 and 18.2%, respectively. PNL resulted in a statistically significant improvement in the kidney function while it worsened after open surgery. The effectiveness of PNL depends on the stone type and size and the kind of lithotripter. It was 7.5 times greater for a large stone than for staghorn calculi and 4.6 times higher for stones sized <45 mm than for those sized > 45 mm. Ultrasonic lithotripter was 2.2 times more effective than another type of lithotripter. The safety of PNL depends on the nephroscope diameter, of a sheath, the number of accesses, the type of lithotripter and the type of stone. Using a 24-Ch nephroscope was 3.6 times safer than that with a diameter greater than 24-Ch; not using a sheath was 3.2 times safer than using it; one access was 3 times safer than at multiple ones; using an ultrasound lithotripter was 2.7 times safer than with another type of lithotripter; treating a large stone was 2.1 times safer than a staghorn stone. Conclusion. The study findings can be used to optimize the treatment of patients with large and staghorn stones of a solitary kidney.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

L. D. Arustamov

N.A. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology - branch of the NMRRC of Minzdrav of Russia

Email: endourology@mail.ru
Ph.D., Researcher at the Department of Endourology Moscow, Russia

M. I. Katibov

N.A. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology - branch of the NMRRC of Minzdrav of Russia

Email: mikatibov@mail.ru
Dr.Med.Sci., Chief Researcher, Assistant Director for Scientific Advisory Work Moscow, Russia

D. S. Merinov

N.A. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology - branch of the NMRRC of Minzdrav of Russia

Email: d.merinov@gmail.com
Ph.D., Head of the Department of Endourology Moscow, Russia

Sh. Sh. Gurbanov

N.A. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology - branch of the NMRRC of Minzdrav of Russia

Email: gurbanovsh@gmail.com
Ph.D., Senior Researcher at the Department of Endourology Moscow, Russia

A. V. Artemov

N.A. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology - branch of the NMRRC of Minzdrav of Russia

Email: artie@mail.ru
Ph.D., Researcher at the Department of Endourology, Head of Operating Unit Moscow, Russia

V. A. Epishov

N.A. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology - branch of the NMRRC of Minzdrav of Russia

Email: val-epishov@yandex.ru
Ph.D., Employee at the Department of Urology #1 Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Kok D.J. Metaphylaxis, diet and lifestyle in stone disease. Arab Journal of Urology. 2012;10(3):240-249.
  2. Kaprin A.D., Apolikhin O.I., Sivkov A.V., Solntseva T.V., Komarova V.A. Analysis of uronephrological morbidity and mortality in the Russian Federation for the period 2002-2014 according to official statistics. Eksperimental’naya i klinicheskaya urologiya. 2016;3:4-13.
  3. Moskalenko S.A., Butin S.P., Dzeranov N.K., Chukin S.A. The use of a stent catheter in patients with stones of a solitary kidney-prevention of obstructive complications after ESWL. Plenum pravleniya Rossiiskogo obshchestva urologov: Sochi. 28-30 apr. 2003 g.: materialy. M. 2003;210-211.
  4. Kupajski M., Tkocz M., Ziaja D. Modern management of stone disease in patients with a solitary kidney. Wideochir. Inne. Tech. Malo. Inwazyjne. 2012;7(1):1-7.
  5. Trapeznikova M.F., Dutov V.V., Polovinchuk A.I., Pashchenko V.B., Popov D.V., Moskovkin A.G. Treatment of urolithiasis in patients with a solitary kidney. Klinicheskaya gerontologiya. 2008;14(10):11-15.
  6. Turk C., Petrik A., Sarica K., Seitz C., Skolarikos A., Straub M., Knoll T. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69:475-482.
  7. Merinov D.S, Artemov A.V., Epishov V.A., Arustamov L.D., Gurbanov Sh.Sh., Fatikhov R.R. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of staghorn kidney stones K3-K4. Eksperimental’naya i klinicheskaya urologiya. 2016;3:21-33.
  8. Nahas A.R., Shokeir A.A., Assmy A.M., Mohsen T., Shoma A.M., Eraky I., Kenawy M.R., Kappany H.A. Post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy extensive hemorrhage: a study of risk factors. J Urol. 2007;177:576-579.
  9. Liu C., Cui Z., Zeng G., Wan S.P., Li J., Zhu W., Zeng T., Liu Y. The optimal minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy strategy for the treatment of staghorn stones in a solitary kidney. Urolithiasis. 2016;44(2):149-154.
  10. Torricelli F.C., Padovani G.P., Marchini G.S., Vicentini F.C., Danilovic A., Reis S.T., Srougi M., Mazzucchi E. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with solitary kidney: a critical outcome analysis. Int Braz J Urol. 2015;41(3):496-502.
  11. Giusti G., Proietti S., Cindolo L., Peschechera R., Sortino G., Berardinelli F., Taverna G. Is retrograde intrarenal surgery a viable treatment option for renal stones in patients with solitary kidney? World J Urol. 2015;33:309-314.
  12. Nahas A.R., Taha D.E., Ali H.M., Elshal A.M., Zahran M.H., Tabey N.A., Assmy A.M., Harraz A.M., Moawad H.E., Othman M.M. Acute kidney injury after percutaneous nephrolithotomy for stones in solitary kidneys. Scand J Urol. 2017;29:1-5.
  13. Alivizatos G., Skolarikos A. Is there still a role for open surgery in the management of renal stones? Curr. Opin. Urol. 2006;16(2): 106-111.
  14. Jones P., Aboumarzouk O.M., Rai B.P., Somani B.K. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Stones in Solitary Kidney: Evidence From a Systematic Review. Urology. 2016;14; S0090-4295(16)30740-30743.
  15. Akulin S.M. Complications of surgical interventions in the treatment of patients with staghorn nephrolithiasis (treatment and prevention). Ph.D. Thesis. M., 2010. 32 p.
  16. Merinov D.S., Pavlov D.A., Fatikhov R.R., Epishov V.A. At the forefront of minimally invasive urology in Russia. Eksperimental’naya i klinicheskaya urologiya. 2012;4:108-12.
  17. Merinov D.S., Pavlov D.A., Fatikhov R.R., Epishov V.A., Gurbanov Sh.Sh., Artemov A.V. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: a delicate and effective tool in the treatment of large kidney stones. Eksperimental’naya i klinicheskaya urologiya. 2013;3:94-99.
  18. Mudraya I.S., Gurbanov Sh.Sh., Merinov D.S. Peristalsis of the ureter in patients with kidney stones and urodynamics of the upper urinary tract after percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy. Eksperimental’naya i klinicheskaya urologiya. 2014;1:67-71.
  19. Merinov D.S., Pavlov D.A., Gurbanov Sh.Sh., Fatikhov R.R., Epishov V.A., Artemov A.V., Shvangiradze I.A. Our 5-year experience in percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with large and staghorn kidney stones. Eksperimental’naya i klinicheskaya urologiya. 2014;2:54-59.
  20. Komyakov B.K., Guliev B.G., Alekseev M.Yu., Lubsanov B.V. Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy for stones of a solitary and allotransplanted kidney. Urologiia. 2011;5:55-60.
  21. Guliev B.G. Percutaneous removal of stones of a solitary kidney. Eksperimental’naya i klinicheskaya urologiya. 2014;3:44-48. Russian (Гулиев Б.Г. Чрескожное удаление камней единственной почки. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2014;3:44-48).
  22. Mahboub M.R., Shakibi M.H. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with solitary kidney. Urol. J. 2008;5(1):24-27.
  23. Resorlu B., Kara C., Oguz U., Bayindir M., Unsal A. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex caliceal and staghorn stones in patients with solitary kidney. Urol. Res. 2011;39(3):171-176.
  24. Xu R., Yi L., Wang X., Zhao H., Dong Z., Jiang H., Wu H., Zhao X., Liu R. Efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of staghorn stones in solitary kidney. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2012;37(6):621-624.
  25. Wang Y., Hou Y., Jiang F., Wang Y., Wang C. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones in patients with solitary kidney in prone position or in completely supine position: a single-center experience. Int. Braz. J. Urol. 2012;38(6):788-794.
  26. Huang Z., Fu F., Zhong Z., Zhang L., Xu R., Zhao X. Chinese minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for intrarenal stones in patients with solitary kidney: a single-center experience. PLoS One. 2012;7(7)0040577.
  27. Akman T., Binbay M., Tekinarslan E., Ozkuvanci U., Kezer C., Erbin A., Berberoglu Y., Yaser-Muslumanoglu A. Outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with solitary kidneys: a single-center experience. Urology. 2011;78(2):272-276.
  28. Canes D., Hegarty N.J., Kamoi K., Haber G.P., Berger A., Aron M., Desai M.M. Functional outcomes following percutaneous surgery in the solitary kidney. J. Urol. 2009;181(1):154-160.
  29. Tabey N.A., Nahas A.R., Eraky I., Shoma A.M., Assmy A.M., Soliman S.A., Shokeir A.A., Mohsen T., Kappany H.A., Kenawy M.R. Long-term functional outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in solitary kidney. Urology. 2014;83(5):1011-1015.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2017 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies