IZUChENIE MINERAL'NOGO SOSTAVA I STRUKTURY UROLITOV ZhITELEY TOMSKOGO RAYONA (G. TOMSK)


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Aim. To successfully treat and prevent urolithiasis, the composition and structure of uroliths should be examined using modern analytical techniques. For a long time, studies of the biomineral formation in the human body have been conducted exclusively in the field of medicine. The main attention has been paid to the diagnosis and treatment of diseases leading to the occurrence of pathogenic formations. At the same time, it is quite obvious that it is important to have a clear idea about the causes of pathogenic formations, the mechanisms for their further formation, composition and structure. Currently, these issues are widely studied all over the world by mineralogists, biochemists, geo-ecologists using methods of mineralogical analysis. The aim of this work was to determine the content of the elements that make up uroliths. This value should be normalized by the clarks of the noosphere. Studies on the mineral composition and structure of uroliths in the Tomsk region allowed to calculate the content of elements. It turned out that each medical district has its own specific geochemical series, which depends, probably, on natural and technogenic factors. Materials and methods. The study included urolith samples obtained from residents of 4 medical sub-districts of Tomsk district. 100 samples of different mineral composition were studied. Analytical techniques including crystal-morphological, spectral, X-ray structural, instrumental neutron-activation, electron microscopic analyses were used to investigate the morphology, mineral composition and structure of uroliths. Results. The average content of elements in the uroliths, and the element concentrations normalized by the clark were established. After calculating the concentration, geochemical associative series of elements were formed. Depending on the morphology, drusiform, microspherolite, porous, coral formations, uroliths with a smoothed surface and stones with combined morphology were identified. Three groups of uroliths were defined according to their structural features: crystalline-granular, spherolithic and combined. Conclusion. Studies to determine the mineral composition and structure of the uroliths of the inhabitants of the Tomsk region made it possible to calculate the content of the elements that make up uroliths, normalized by clarks of the noosphere. Each medical sub-district has its own specific geochemical series, which depends on natural and technogenic factors. The increased value of the indicator of the content of elements in uroliths should serve as a warning factor for developing measures to reduce the urolithiasis incidence in the population.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

O. A Sevostyanova

National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Institute of Natural Resources

Email: sevostyanovaoa@tpu.ru
PhD.(Geol.-Miner.Sci.), Associate Professor at the Department of GGLM, Institute of Natural Resources Tomsk, Russia

V. S Boshchenko

Siberian State Medical University of Minzdrav of Russia

Email: vsbosh@mail.ru
Dr.Med.Sci., Urologist of the Highest Category, Associate Professor at the Department of Urology Tomsk, Russia

V. K Osadchii

National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Institute of Natural Resources

Email: vkosad@mail.ru
Student at the Institute of Natural Resources Tomsk, Russia

V. P Parnachev

National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University

Email: dingeo@ggf.tsu.ru
Dr.Geol.-Miner.Sci., Professor, Head of the Department of Dynamic Geology, Faculty of Geology and Geography Tomsk, Russia

A. K Polienko

National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Institute of Natural Resources

Email: polienkoa@yandex.ru
Dr.Geol.-Miner.Sci., Associate Professor at the Department of GGLM, Institute Tomsk, Russia

References

  1. Grigoriev D. P. Development of ideas of objects of mineralogy and a concept about minerals according to A. K. Boldyrev.1956;85:4.
  2. Yushkin N.P. Theory and methods of mineralogy. L.: Nedra, 1977: 290 p.
  3. Russian (Юшкин Н.П. Теория и методы минералогии. Л.: Недра, 1977:290 с.).
  4. Polienko A.K., Choubin G.V., Yermolaev V.A. Ontogenie of the uroliths. Tomsk.1997:128p.
  5. Katkova V.I. Mineral evolution of the uric stones. Syktyvkar, 1995:23 p.
  6. Zuzuk F.V. Mineralogy of urolithes. Distribution of an urolithic illness among a world's population (in Ukrain). Lutsk., 2002;1:408 p
  7. Polienko A.K., Boshchenko V.S., Sevostyanovа O.A. The list of literature (review) on studying ofuric stones by the Russian researchers (the period from 1965 to 2015, in 2 parts). Part 1:112-116 p.
  8. Polienko A.K., Boshchenko V.S., Sevostyanovа O.A. The list of literature (review) on studying ofuric stones by the Russian researchers (the period from 1965 to 2015, in 2 parts). Part II:117-121 p.
  9. Polienko A.K., Sevostyanova O.A., Orlov A.A. Symbiosis of live and inert substance in urolithes. 2010;317(1):10-15.
  10. Polienko A.K., Boshchenko V.S., Sevostyanova O.A. The relationship of organic and inorganic substances in the formation of urinary stones. Bulletin of the Siberian medicine. 2012;1(2):52-58.
  11. Polienko A.K., Dutova Е.М. Urinary stones investigation and influence of the water factor to their formation in a human organism. Proceeding the 4th Korea-Russia International Symposium of Science and Technology. 2000;1:278-283.
  12. Rausher K., Yanssen F., Minikhold R. Bases of the spectral analysis. M., 2006:224 p.
  13. Kitaigorodsky A.I. X-ray diffraction analysis. 1950:651 p.
  14. Chernov A.A., Givargizov E.I., Bagdasarov H.S., Demianets L.N., Kuznetsov V.A., Lobachev A.N. Modern crystallography. Formation of a crystallography. M., 1980;3:407 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies