Features of the mineral composition of urinary stones depending on the region of residence, gender and age in the Russian Federation, Belarus and Kazakhstan

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Introduction: Urolithiasis (UCD) is the most common and most expensive urological disease in all regions of the planet. The study of the prevalence of types of urinary stones in different areas of the country and the world plays an important role in predicting the burden on the health care system as a whole and the urological community, including in terms of calculating the probability of recurrence of the disease, even against the background of effective metaphylactic therapy.

Purpose: in connection with the above, we made an attempt to assess the prevalence of various types of urinary stones in various regions of the Russian Federation, Belarus, Kazakhstan and the dynamics of changes in the composition of urinary stones depending on age and gender.

Materials and methods: the study is based on data from a study of the chemical composition of 6787 urinary stones, presented by INVITRO in an anonymized form for the period 2018–2021. The study of the chemical composition of stones was carried out by infrared spectroscopy and/or X-ray diffraction.

Results. The prevalence of one-, two- and multi-component urinary stones of the adult population and children in both sexes of the Russian Federation, the Republics of Kazakhstan and Belarus was estimated. Separate regularities in the distribution of the component composition of stones in each region, with age and gender, were noted.

Conclusion. The study of the composition of urinary stones is important in choosing an adequate tactic for metaphylactic treatment.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

V. S. Saenko

I.M. Sechenov (Sechenov University)

Email: Saenko_vs@mail.ru

Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor of the Institute of Urology and Human Reproductive Health

Russian Federation, Moscow

A. Z. Vinarov

I.M. Sechenov (Sechenov University)

Author for correspondence.
Email: avinarov@mail.ru

Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor of the Institute of Urology and Human Reproductive Health

Russian Federation, Moscow

Yu. L. Demidko

I.M. Sechenov (Sechenov University)

Email: demidko1@mail.ru

Doctor of Medical Sciences, Urologist, LDO Institute of Urology and Human Reproductive Health

Russian Federation, Moscow

R. V. Puchenkin

Crimean Federal University named after V.I. Vernadsky

Email: puchenkin.r.v.doc@mail.ru

Urologist Clinical Multidisciplinary Center named after St. Luke

Russian Federation, Simferopol, Republic of Crimea

M. A. Gazimiev

I.M. Sechenov (Sechenov University)

Email: avinarov@mail.ru

Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Deputy Director of the Institute of Urology and Human Reproductive Health

Russian Federation, Moscow

P. V. Glybochko

I.M. Sechenov (Sechenov University)

Email: avinarov@mail.ru

Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Rector, Director of the Institute of Urology and Reproductive Health

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Litwin M.S., Saigal C. US Government Printing Office; Washington, DC: 2012. Urologic diseases in America. [Google Scholar].
  2. Antonelli J..A., Maalouf N.M., Pearle M.S., et al. Use of the National Health and Nutrition. Examination Survey to Calculate the Impact of Obesity and Diabetes on Cost and Prevalence of Urolithiasis in 2030. European Urology. 2014; 66:724–729. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.036.
  3. Geraghty R.M., Cook P., Walker V., Somani B.K. Evaluation of the Economic Burden of Kidney Stone Disease in the UK: A Retrospective Cohort study with a mean follow-up of 19 years. BJU International. 2020;125(Issue 4):586–594.
  4. Scales C.D., Jr., Smith A.C., Hanley J.M., Saigal C.S. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. European urology. 2012;62(1):160–165.
  5. Knoll T., Schubert A.B., Fahlenkamp D., Leusmann D.B., Wendt-Nordahl G., Schubert G. Urolithiasis through the ages: data on more than 200,000 urinary stone analyses. J Urol. 2011;185(4):1304–1311. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.073;
  6. Trinchieri A., Coppi F., Montanari E., Del Nero A., Zanetti G., Pisani E. Increase in the prevalence of symptomatic upper urinary tract stones during the last ten years. Eur Urol. 2000;37(1):23–25. doi: 10.1159/000020094
  7. Pietro Manuel Ferraro, Eric N Taylor, Gary C Curhan. Factors associated with sex differences in the risk of kidney stones. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022 Feb 9; gfac037. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfac037. Online ahead of print.
  8. Goldfarb D.S., Avery A.R., Beara-Lasic L., Duncan G.E., Goldberg J. A Twin Study of Genetic Influences on Nephrolithiasis in Women and Men. Kidney International Reports. 2019;4:535–540.
  9. Pytel A.Ya, Shubladze I.In About the geographical prevalence of urolithiasis on the globe. Urology and Nephrology 1966.
  10. Wong Y., Cook P., Roderick P., Somani Bh.K. Metabolic Syndrome and Kidney Stone Disease: A Systematic Review of Literature; https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/end.2015.0567 https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2015.0567
  11. Zhang Y., Long G., Ding B., Sun G., Ouyang W., Liu M., Ye Z., Xu H., Li H. The impact of ambient temperature on the incidence ofurolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019.
  12. Katarzyna Jobs, Magda Rakowska, Aleksandra Paturej. Urolithiasis in the pediatric population - Current opinion on epidemiology, patophysiology, diagnostic evaluation and treatment. Journal of mother and child. 2021;22(2):201–208, doi: 10.34763/devperiodmed.20182202.201208.
  13. Jonathan El Beze, Charles Mazeaud, Christian Daul, Gilberto Ochoa-Ruiz, Michel Daudon, Pascal Eschwège, Jacques Hubert. Evaluation and understanding of automated urinary stone recognition methods. BJU Int. 2022;130(6):786–798. doi: 10.1111/bju.15767.
  14. Joseph H. Randall, Bristol B. Whiles, Raphael V. Carrera, Willian E. Ito, Jeffrey A. Thompson, David A. Duchene, Donald A. Neff, Wilson R Molina. On the rocks: can urologists identify stone composition based on endoscopic images alone? A worldwide survey of urologists. World Journal of Urology. 2023;41(2):575–579. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04269-9.
  15. Michel Daudon, Arnaud Dessombz, Vincent Frochot, Emmanuel Letavernier, Jean-Philippe Haymann, Paul Jungers, Dominique Bazin. Comprehensive morpho-constitutional analysis of urinary stones improves etiological diagnosis and therapeutic strategy of nephrolithiasis. C. R. Chimie 19 (2016) 1470e1491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crci.2016.05.008
  16. Nitkin D.M., Yurakha T.M., Gres A.A., Gres N.A., Solovey O.M. Diagnostic possibilities of qualitative express-analysis of the mineralogical composition of uroliths. Urologiia. 2021;6:14–19.
  17. Mayandi Sivaguru, Jessica J. Saw, Elena M Wilson, John C. Lieske, Amy E. Krambeck, James C. Williams, Michael F. Romero, Kyle W. Fouke, Matthew W. Curtis, Jamie L. Kear-Scott, Nicholas Chia, Bruce W Fouke. Human kidney stones: a natural record of universal biomineralization. Nat Rev Urol. 2021;18(7):404–432. doi: 10.1038/s41585-021-00469-x.
  18. Robert Medairos, Neil J. Paloian, Amy Pan, Andrea Moyer, Jonathan S .Ellison. Risk factors for subsequent stone events in pediatric nephrolithiasis: A multi-institutional analysis. J Pediatr Urol. 2021;S1477-5131(21)00568-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.11.012.
  19. Yi Li, David Bayne, Scott Wiener, Justin Ahn, Marshall Stoller, Thomas Chi. Stone formation in patients less than 20 years of age is associated with higher rates of stone recurrence: Results from the Registry for Stones of the Kidney and Ureter (ReSKU). J Pediatr Urol. 2020;16(3):373.e1-373.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.03.014.
  20. John E. Brinkman, Tim Large, Charles U. Nottingham, Christa Stoughton, and Amy E. Krambeck. Journal of Endourology VOL. 35, NO. 10 | General Research Normal Clinical and Metabolic Correlates of Pure Stone Subtypes. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.1035
  21. Ottman N., Smidt H., de Vos W.M. & Belzer C. (2012). The function of our microbiota: who is out there and what do they do? Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 2, 104. http://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2012.00104;
  22. Denburg M.R., Koepsell K., Lee J.-J., Gerber J., Bittinger K., Tasian G.E. .Perturbations of the Gut Microbiome and Metabolome in Children with Calcium Oxalate Kidney Stone Disease. JASN 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2019101131
  23. epeda Delgado M., López Izquierdo R., Amón Sesmero J.H., Del Pozo Vegas C., Álvarez Manzanares J. Epidemiological Characteristics of Renal Colic and Climate-Related Causes in a Continental Area in Spain. Urol Int. 2015;95(3):309–13.
  24. Meria P., Hadjadj H., Jungers P., Daudon M., Members of the French Urological Association Urolithiasis Committee. Stone formation and pregnancy: pathophysiological insights gained from morphoconstitutional stone analysis. J Urol. 2010; 183:1412–1416.
  25. Reinstatler L., Khaleel S., Pais V.M.Jr. Association of pregnancy with stone formation among US women: A National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey analysis 2007-2012. J Urol. 2017;198(2):389–393. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.3233
  26. Ferraro P.M., Marano R., Primiano A., Gervasoni J., Bargagli M., Rovere G., Bassi P.F., Gambaro G.J. Nephrol. Stone composition and vascular calcifications in patients with nephrolithiasis. 2019;32(4):589–594. doi: 10.1007/s40620-019-00619-w.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Fig.1. Prevalence of single-component urinary stones among men (n=272) and women (n=176)

Download (187KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Fig.2. Distribution of single-component stones by age among men (A, n=273) and among women (B, n=175)

Download (227KB)
Indexing metadata
4. Fig.4. Distribution of two-component stones by age among men (A; n=2427) and women (B; n=1578)

Download (341KB)
Indexing metadata

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies