Reference values for basic ejaculate analysis from fertile men: russian regional characteristics (multicenter cross-sectional retrospective study)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Introduction. The current “WHO Manual for the Laboratory Examination and Processing of Human Semen” (6th edition, 2021) states the variability and low predictive ability of traditionally ejaculate parameters (ejaculate volume, sperm concentration, motility and morphology), abandons the concept of “norm”, replacing it with 5% and 95% percentiles, and recommends the formation of regional criteria for reference ranges.

Aim. To establish reference ranges for basic indicators of ejaculate analysis from fertile Russian men to improve the clinical and economic efficiency of providing medical care to infertile couples.

Materials and methods. A multicenter cross-sectional retrospective study was carried out. Based on the results of a clinical and laboratory examination, a group of fertile men was formed who met the following criteria:

  • confirmed pregnancy in the wife (regular partner) according to hCG and/or ultrasound;
  • ejaculate analysis was performed in specialized andrological laboratories according to WHO protocols;
  • between the date of the study performed and the estimated date of pregnancy there was no more than 3 months (the analysis could be performed before the date of pregnancy, or after the fact of pregnancy was established);
  • pregnancy in a natural cycle;
  • absence of any specific treatment at least 3 months before the date of pregnancy;
  • pregnancy outcome (childbirth, medical abortions, miscarriages, anembryonic pregnancies) was not taken into account.

In total, the sample included 445 men who was examined in the health care facility where the authors of the article worked regarding sexual dysfunction, chronic prostatitis, or miscarriage.

Results. The reference values of basic ejaculate parameters of fertile Russian men differed from the international data presented in the WHO Guidelines, 6th edition (2021). The lower 5% percentile in Russians was higher for sperm concentration (20 and 16 million/ ml, respectively) and ejaculate volume (1.7 and 1.4 ml, respectively), but less for the proportion of sperm with progressive motility (24 and 30%, respectively). Moreover, our values were very close to those from the WHO Guidelines, 4th edition (1999): 20 million/ml, 2 ml and 25%, respectively. The lower 5% percentile of the number of sperm with progressive motility was 21 million, while the minimum value was 5.2 million. The upper 95% percentile of the percentage of abnormal forms was equal to 99%, which indicates the low predictive ability of this indicator in the assessment possibility of conception. It should be remembered that a “fertile man”, i.e. the man who caused the pregnancy is not identical to the concept of a “healthy” man in the reproductive sense, since in 30-40% of cases, anembryonic pregnancy is associated with low sperm quality (ESHRE, 2022).

Conclusion. Our data suggest that for Russian men, the following threshold values foe sperm analysis should be used: for the term “oligospermia”, ejaculate volume is <1.7 ml, “oligozoospermia” means the sperm concentration <20 million/ml, for “asthenozoospermia” is defined as <24% progressively sperm motility, and “teratozoospermia” is diagnosed when <1% of morphologically normal sperms with Papanicolaou staining using “strict” criteria. In 95% of fertile men, a number of sperms with progressive motility was at least 21 million, when in 5% it was from 5 to 20 million. A value <5 million indicate a low probability of conception.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

V. А. Bozhedomov

Lomonosov Moscow State University; National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after V.I. Kulakov

Author for correspondence.
Email: vbojedomov@mail.ru

Ph.D., MD, Head of the “Men's Health” Clinic, professor at the Department of Urology and Andrology, Faculty of Fundamental Medicine, leading researcher, Board Member of the Russian Society of Urologists 

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

I. A. Korneev

First St. Petersburg State Medical University; LTD International Center for Reproductive Medicine

Email: vbojedomov@mail.ru

Ph.D., MD, professor, Medical Director of the International center of the Reproductive Medicine, professor at the Department of Urology, vice-chairman of the Russian Society of Urologists

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

I. A. Lipatova

LLC "Men's Health Clinic MED-CODE"

Email: vbojedomov@mail.ru

physician at the Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics 

Russian Federation, Moscow

G. E. Bozhedomovа

Lomonosov Moscow State University; LLC "Men's Health Clinic MED-CODE"

Email: vbojedomov@mail.ru

medical technologist 

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

R. A. Kamarina

FGBU Polyclinic №3; LLC "Men's Health Clinic MED-CODE"

Email: vbojedomov@mail.ru

physician of clinical laboratory diagnostics 

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

М. А. Nikolaeva

National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after V.I. Kulakov

Email: vbojedomov@mail.ru

chief researcher of the Laboratory of Clinical Immunology 

Russian Federation, Moscow

E. F. Galimova

FGBOU VO Bashkir State Medical University of Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: vbojedomov@mail.ru

Ph.D., MD, professor at the Department of Pathophysiology

Russian Federation, Ufa

Sh. N. Galimov

FGBOU VO Bashkir State Medical University of Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: vbojedomov@mail.ru

Ph.D., MD, professor, Head of the Department of Biochemistry

Russian Federation, Ufa

Е. А. Epanchintseva

FGBNU "Federal Research Center of Fundamental and Translational Medicine”; LTD “Novosibirsk Center of Reproductive medicine”

Email: vbojedomov@mail.ru

Ph.D., endocrinologist and urologist-andrologist, senior researcher at the laboratory of endocrinology, assistant at the Department of Urology 

Russian Federation, Novosibirsk; Novosibirsk

V. N. Pavlov

FGBOU VO Bashkir State Medical University of Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: vbojedomov@mail.ru

Ph.D., MD, professor, academician of RAS, rector, Head of the Department of Urology with a course of postgraduate education, first vice-chairman of the Russian Society of Urologists

Russian Federation, Ufa

A. A. Kamalov

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: armais.kamalov@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4251-7545

Academician of the RAS, Ph.D., MD, professor, Director of Medical Scientific and Educational Center, Head of the Department of Urology and Andrology, Faculty of Fundamental Medicine, President of RPO “Men’s Health”, vice-chairman of the Russian Society of Urologists 

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Clinical recommendations «Male infertility». Russian Society of Urologists. 2021. Available at: Rubricator KR (minzdrav.gov.ru). Russian (Клинические рекомендации «Мужское бесплодие». Российское общество урологов. 2021. Доступно по: Рубрикатор КР (minzdrav.gov.ru).
  2. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed. Geneva: WHO; 2010.
  3. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen, sixth edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.
  4. EAU Guidelines on Sexual and Reproductive Health. A. Salonia (Chair), C. Bettocchi, P. Capogrosso, J. Carvalho, et al. ©European Association of Urology. 2023, p. 151–155, 188.
  5. Cooper T.G., Jockenhoevel F., Nieschlag E. Variations in semen parameters from fathers. Hum Reprod. 1991;6: 859–866.
  6. Haugen T.B., Egeland T., Magnus O. Semen parameters in Norwegian fertile men. J Androl. 2006;27:66–71.
  7. Macleod J., Gold R.Z. The male factor in fertility and infertility. II. Spermatozoon counts in 1000 men of known fertility and in 1000 cases of infertile marriage. J Urol. 1951;66(3):436–449. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)74358-3.
  8. Campbell M.J., Lotti F., Baldi E., Schlatt S., Festin M.P.R., Björndahl L., Toskin I., Barratt C.L.R. Distribution of semen examination results 2020 – A follow up of data collated for the WHO semen analysis manual 2010. Andrology. 2021;9(3):817–822. doi: 10.1111/andr.12983.
  9. Redmon J.B., Thomas W., Ma W. et al. Semen parameters in fertile US men: the Study for Future Families. Andrology. 2013;1(6):806–814.
  10. Bozhedomov V.A., Nikolaeva M.A., Ushakova I.V., Bozhedomova G.E., Lipatova N.A., Kamarina R.A., Okhobotov D.A., Kamalov A.A. The structure of sperm quality disorders in men from infertile couples and the algorithm for managing such patients in specialized institutions of the third level. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2020;11:159–167. Russian (Божедомов В.А., Николаева М.А., Ушакова И.В., Божедомова Г.Е., Липатова Н.А., Камарина Р.А., Охоботов Д.А., Камалов А.А. Структура нарушений качества спермы у мужчин из бесплодных пар и алгоритм ведения таких пациентов в специализированных учреждениях третьего уровня. Акушерство и гинекология. 2020;11:159–167).
  11. Parekattil S.J., Esteves S.C., Agarwal A. Editors. Male Infertility: Contemporary Clinical Approaches, Andrology, ART and Antioxidants. Second Edition, ©Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021, p. 28.
  12. Menkveld R., Stander F.S., Kotze T.J., Kruger T.F., van Zyl J.A. The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria. Hum Reprod. 1990;5:586–592.
  13. International Organization for Standardization ISO 23162:2021 Basic semen examination – Specification and test methods ISO, Geneva (2021).
  14. Galimov Sh.N., Bozhedomov V.A., Galimova E.F., Pavlov V.N., Sukhoi G.T. Male infertility: molecular and immunological aspects. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2020. 208 p. Russian (Галимов Ш.Н., Божедомов В.А., Галимова Э.Ф., Павлов В.Н., Сухих Г.Т. Мужское бесплодие: молекулярные и иммунологические аспекты. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2020. 208 с.).
  15. Infertility prevalence estimates, 1990–2021. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
  16. Levine H., Jørgensen N., Martino-Andrade A., Mendiola J., Weksler-Derri D., Jolles M., Pinotti R., Swan S.H. Temporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis of samples collected globally in the 20th and 21st centuries. Hum Reprod Update. 2023;29(2):157–176. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmac035. PMID: 36377604.
  17. Korneyev I.A. Annual trends in semen parameters among men attending a fertility center between 2016 and 2022. Urology reports. 2023;13(1):23–29. doi: 10.17816/uroved296569. Russian (Корнеев И.А. Сравнительная характеристика параметров эякулята мужчин, обратившихся в центр репродуктивной медицины с 2016 по 2022 г. Урологические ведомости. 2023;13(1):23–29. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17816/uroved296569)
  18. Lebedev G.S., Golubev N.A., Shaderkin I.A., Shaderkina V.A., Apolikhin O.I., Sivkov A.V., Komarova V.A. Male infertility in the Russian Federation: statistical data for 2000-2018. Experimental and clinical urology. 2019;4:4–13. Russian (Лебедев Г.С., Голубев Н.А., Шадеркин И.А., Шадеркина В.А., Аполихин О.И., Сивков А.В., Комарова В.А. Мужское бесплодие в Российской Федерации: статистические данные за 2000–2018 годы. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2019;4:4–13).
  19. Nieschlag E. Scope and Goals of Andrology. Andrology: Male Reproductive Health and Disfunction. 3rd. E.Nieschlag, H.M.Behre, S.Nieschlag (Ed.), 2010; р. 4.
  20. Kekäläinen J. Genetic incompatibility of the reproductive partners: an evolutionary perspective on infertility. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(12):3028–3035.
  21. Björndahl L. A paradigmatic shift in the care of male factor infertility: how can the recommendations for basic semen examination in the sixth edition of the WHO manual and the ISO 23162:2021 standard help? Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2022;45(Issue 4):731–736.
  22. Agarwal A., Tvrda E., Sharma R. Relationship amongst teratozoospermia, seminal oxidative stress and male infertility. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2014;12:45.
  23. Blanchard M., Haguenoer K., Apert A., Poret H., Barthélémy C., Royère D., Guérif F. Sperm morphology assessment using David's classification: time to switch to strict criteria? Prospective comparative analysis in a selected IVF population. Int J Androl. 2011;34(2):145–152.
  24. Rachel B. Danis, Mary K. Samplaski. Sperm Morphology: History, Challenges, and Impact on Natural and Assisted Fertility. Curr Urol Rep. 2019;20(8):43.
  25. Gatimel N., Moreau J., Parinaud J., Léandri R.D. Sperm morphology: assessment, pathophysiology, clinical relevance, and state of the art in 2017. Andrology. 2017;5(5):845–862. doi: 10.1111/andr.12389.
  26. Kruger T.F., Acosta A.A., Simmons K.F. et al. New method of evaluating sperm morphology with predictive value for human in vitro fertilization. Urology. 1987;30(3):248–251. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(87)90246-9.
  27. Kruger T.F., Acosta A.A., Simmons K.F., Swanson R.J., Matta J.F., Oehninger S. Kruger T.F., et al. Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1988;49(1):112–127. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59660-5.
  28. Esteves S.E. Zini A., Aziz N. et al. Critical appraisal of World Health Organization's new reference values for human semen characteristics and effect on diagnosis and treatment of subfertile men. Urology 2012;79:16–22.
  29. Keihani S., Verrilli L.E., Zhang C., Presson A.P., Hanson H.A., Pastuszak A.W., Johnstone E.B., Hotaling J.M. Semen parameter thresholds and time-to-conception in subfertile couples: how high is high enough? Human reproduction (Oxford, England). 2021l;36:2121–2133.
  30. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 23162:2021 Basic semen examination – Specification and test methods. ISO, Geneva (2021
  31. te Velde E.R., Eijkemans R., Habbema H.D. Variation in couple fecundity and time to pregnancy, an essential concept in human reproduction. Lancet. 2000;355:1928–1929.
  32. Fei Chen, Shiheng Zhu, Zhiqing Dai, Lanting Hao, Chun Luan, Qi Guo, Chaofan Meng, Yankun Zhang. Effects of COVID-19 and mRNA vaccines on human fertility. Hum Reprod. 2021;37(1):5–13. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab238.
  33. Hamilton J.A., Cissen M., Brandes M., et al. Total motile sperm count: a better indicator for the severity of male factor infertility than the WHO sperm classification system. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(5):1110–1121.
  34. Boeri L., Belladelli F., Capogrosso P., Cazzaniga W., Candela L., Pozzi E., Valsecchi L., Papaleo E., Viganò P., Abbate C., Pederzoli F., Alfano M., Montorsi F., Salonia A. Normal sperm parameters per se do not reliably account for fertility: A case-control study in the real-life setting. Andrologia. 2021;53(1):e13861. doi: 10.1111/and.13861.
  35. Bellis M.A., Hughes K., Hughes S., Ashton J.R. Measuring paternal discrepancy and its public health consequences. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59(9):749–754. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.036517.
  36. Barratt C.L.R., Björndahl L., De Jonge C.J., Lamb D.J., Osorio Martini F., McLachlan R., Oates R.D., van der Poel S., St John B., Sigman M., et al. The diagnosis of male infertility: an analysis of the evidence to support the development of global WHO guidance-challenges and future research opportunities. Human reproduction update. 2017;23:660–680.
  37. Pozzi E., Fallara G., Belladelli F., Corsini C., Raffo M., Candela L et al. Clinical parameters associated with altered sperm DNA fragmentation index among primary infertile men: Findings from a real-life cross-sectional study. Andrology. 2023;11(8):1694–1701. doi: 10.1111/andr.13380.
  38. Agarwal А., Majzoub А., Parekh N., et al. A Schematic Overview of the Current Status of Male Infertility Practice. World J Mens Health. 2019: 1–15.
  39. ESHRE. Guideline on the management of recurrent pregnancy loss. 2023, p. 91–95.
  40. Inversetti A., Bossi A., Cristodoro M., Larcher A., Busnelli A., Grande G., et al. Recurrent pregnancy loss: a male crucial factor-A systematic review and meta-analysis. Andrology. 2023 Oct 25. doi: 10.1111/andr.13540. Online ahead of print.
  41. Mikec Š., Kolenc Ž., Peterlin B, Horvat S., Pogorevc N., Kunej T. Syndromic male subfertility: A network view of genome–phenome associations. Andrology. 2022;10(4):720–732. doi: 10.1111/andr.13167
  42. Brendan J., Riera-Escamilla A., Wyrwoll M.J., Salas-Huetos A., Xavier M.J., Nagirnaja L. et al. A systematic review of the validated monogenic causes of human male infertility: 2020 update and a discussion of emerging gene–disease relationships. Hum Reprod Update. 2022;28(1):15–29.
  43. Busnelli A., Garolla A., Di Credico E., D'Ippolito S., Merola A.M., Milardi D., Pontecorvi A., Scambia G., Di Simone N. Sperm DNA fragmentation and idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss: Results from a multicenter case-control study. Andrology. 2023;11(8):1673–1681. doi: 10.1111/andr.13395
  44. Bozhedomov V., Lipatova N., Bozhedomova G., Kamarina R., Shomarufov A., Kamalov A. Sperm chromatin integrity in men from infertile couples with terato- zoospermia and normozoospermia. Human Reproduction. 2022;37(1): i212.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Figure. Basic indicators of the ejaculate of fertile Russian men: A-volume, B-concentration of sperm, C-proportion of progressively motile forms, D-morphology of sperm, D-estimated number of motile sperm in the entire ejaculate.

Download (267KB)

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies