Safety and efficiency of retrograde intrarenal surgery without X-ray guidance

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Introduction. The main stages of flexible ureteroscopy in patients with renal stones are usually performed under X-ray guidance. Long-term exposure of ionizing radiation can have negative effects on the patients with nephrolithiasis and the operating team.

Aim. To study the results of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) without fluoroscopic guidance.

Materials and methods. The results of flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) without X-ray-guidance in 76 patients were analyzed. There were 46 (53.3%) men and 30 (46.7%) women. The average age was 50.4±14.6 years. All patients underwent laboratory tests and non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography to determine the size and density of the stone. In all cases, preoperative ureteral stenting was performed. The average stone size was 10.5±4.2 mm. First, ureteroscopy with a rigid endoscope was done to assess the ureter and determine the depth of the introducing ureteral access sheath. After removing the ureteroscope along the guidewire, a ureteral access sheath was put at this distance. An inspection of the collecting system and laser fragmentation of kidney stones were performed using a flexible ureteroscope. In 64 (84.2%) patients, a 4.7 Ch stent was put at the end of the procedure, while in the remaining 12 (15.8%) patients, a ureteral catheter was left for 1–2 days. The operation time, stone-free rate, and the number of intra- and postoperative complications were studied.

Results. All fURS were successful and performed without X-ray guidance. The average operation time was 42.5±8.0 minutes. After the first session, stone-free rate was 92.1% (70/76). In 6 (7.9%) cases, residual stones were found, which were completely removed after the second session. Intraoperative complications, namely perforation of the upper calyx by the distal end of the ureteral access sheath, were observed in 2 (2.6%) patients, which did not require any additional interventions. Postoperative complications occurred in 10 (13.2%) patients, including fever in 6 (7.9%) and hematuria in 4 (5.3%) cases. There were no serious complications, such as ureteral perforation or sepsis, and no blood transfusion was performed.

Conclusion. Flexible ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy can be performed safely and effectively without X-ray guidance.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

B. G. Guliev

North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov; Center of Urology with robot-assisted surgery of City Mariinsky hospital

Email: gulievbg@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2359-6973

Ph.D., MD, professor, Head 

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

A. E. Talyshinsky

Center of Urology with robot-assisted surgery of City Mariinsky hospital

Author for correspondence.
Email: ali-ma@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3521-8937

urologist

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

M. U. Agagyulov

North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov

Email: murad1311@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9647-9690

Ph.D. student at the Department of Urology

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

А. А. Andrianov

North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov

Email: mr.haisenberg001@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6905-0581

resident at the Department of Urology

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Zeng G., Zhao Z., Mazzon G., Pearle M., Choong S., Skolarikos A. et al. European Association of Urology section of urolithiasis and international Alliance of urolothiasis joint consensus on retrograde intrarenal surgery for the management of renal stones. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8 (5):1461–1468. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.10.011.
  2. Popov S.V., Orlov I.N., Sytnik D.A., Radzhabov R.M. Retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stones larger than two centimetres. Urology Herald. 2022;10(3):98–105. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2022-10-3-98-105. Russian (Попов С.В., Орлов И.Н., Сытник Д.А., Раджабов Р.М. Ретроградная интраренальная хирургия при камнях почек более двух сантиметров. Вестник урологии. 2022;10(3):98–105. doi: 10.21886/2308-6424-2022-10-3-98-105).
  3. Guliyev B.G., Komyakov B.K., Agagyulov M.U., Yagubov Kh.Kh., Korol E.I., Talyshinsky A.E. Retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney diseases. Urologiia. 2022;5:84–89. doi: 10.18565/urology.2022.5.84-89. Russian (Гулиев Б.Г., Комяков Б.К., Агагюлов М.У., Ягубов Х.Х., Король Е.И., Талышинский А.Э. Ретроградная интраренальная хирургия заболеваний почек. Урология. 2022;5:84–89. doi: 10.18565/urology.2022.5.84-89).
  4. Türk C., Petřík A., Sarica K., Seitz C., Skolarikos A. et al. EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):475–482. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041.
  5. Cardis E., Vrijheid M., Blettner M., Gilbert E., Hakama M., Hill C. et al. The 15-country collaborative study of cancer risk among radiation workers in the nuclear industry: estimates of radiation-related cancer risks. Radiat Res. 2007;167:396–416. doi: 10.1667/RR0553.1.
  6. Violette P.D., Szymanski K.M., Anidjar M., Andonian S. Factors determining fluoroscopy time during ureteroscopy. J Endourol. 2011;25(12):1837–1840. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0204.
  7. Hein S., Wilhelm K., Miernik A., Schoenthaler M., Suarez-Ibarrola R. еt al. Radiation exposure during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): a prospective multicenter evaluation. World J Urol. 2021;39(1):217–224. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03160-9.
  8. Bhanot R., Hameed Z., Shah M., Juliebo-Jones P. et al. ALARA in urology: steps to minimise radiation exposure during all parts of the endourological journey. Curr Urol. Rep. 2022; 23 (10):256–259. doi: 10.1007/s11934-022-01102-z.
  9. Mandhani A., Chaudhury H., Gupta N., Singh H.K., Kapoor R., Kumar A. Is fluoroscopy essential for retrieval of lower ureteric stones? Urol Int. 2007;78(1):70–72. doi: 10.1159/000096938.
  10. Hsi R.S., Harper J.D. Fluoroless ureteroscopy: zero-dose fluoroscopy during ureteroscopic treatment of urinary-tract calculi. J Endourol. 2013;27:432–437. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0478.
  11. Olgin G., Smith D., Alsyouf M., Arenas J.L., Engebretsen S. et al. Ureteroscopy without fluoroscopy: a feasibility study and comparison with conventional ureteroscopy. J Endourol. 2015; 29(6):625–629. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0237.
  12. Danilovic A., Nunes E., Lipkin M.E., Ferreira T., Torricelli F.C. et al. Low dose fluoroscopy during ureteroscopy does not compromise surgical outcomes. J Endourol. 2019;33(7):527–532. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0722.
  13. Manzo B.O., Lozada E., Manzo G., Sánchez H.M., Gomez F. et al. Radiation-free flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stone treatment. Arab J Urol. 2019;17(3):200–205. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2019.1606381.
  14. Clark K., King S., Patel A., Hill S., Deem S., Hale N.E. Reducing radiation exposure to patients and staff during routine ureteroscopic stone surgery: adopting a fluoroless technique. Cureus. 2021;13(7):e16279. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16279.
  15. Guliyev B.G., Komyakov B.K., Talyshinsky A.E., Povago I.A., Allakhverdi-yev O.N. Non-trentgen ureterolithotripsy with ureteral stones. Experiment. and a wedge. urology. 2022;16(4):85–90. doi: 10.29188/2222-8543-2022-16-4-85-90. Russian (Гулиев Б.Г., Комяков Б.К., Талышинский А.Э., Поваго И.А., Аллахвердиев О.Н. Безрентгеновская уретеролитотрипсия при камнях мочеточника. Эксперим. и клин. урология. 2022;16(4):85–90. doi: 10.29188/2222-8543-2022-16-4-85-90).
  16. Kirac M., Tepeler A., Guneri C., Kalkan S., Kardas S. et al. Reduced radiation fluoroscopy protocol during retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of kidney stones. Urol J. 2014;11:1589–1594.
  17. Çimen H.İ., Halis F., Sağlam H.S., Gökçe A. Flouroscopy-free technique is safe and feasible in retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones. Turk J Urol. 2017;43(3):309–312. doi: 10.5152/tud.2017.24638.
  18. Senel C., Tuncel A., Balcı M. et al. Safety and reliability of fluoroscopy-free technique in retrograde intrarenal surgery. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2018;70:606–611. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.18.03228-9.
  19. Kirac M., Kopru B., Ergin G., Kibar Y., Biri H. Is fluoroscopy necessary during flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment for the treatment of renal stones? Arab J Urol. 2020;18(2):112–112. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2019.1702242.
  20. Birowo P., Raharja P.A., Atmoko W., Rasyid N. X-ray-free endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for complex proximal ureteral stone: a case report. Res Rep Urol. 2021;13:121–125. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S299707.
  21. Krupp N., Bowman R., Tenggardjaja C., Jellison F., Hill B. et al. Fluoroscopic organ and tissue-specific radiation exposure by sex and body mass index during ureteroscopy. J Endourol. 2010;24:1067–1072. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0040.
  22. Thaker A., Navadeh S., Gonzales H., Malekinejad `M. Effectiveness of policies on reducing exposure to ionizing radiation from medical imaging: a systematic review. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12:1434–1445. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.06.033.
  23. Hellawell G.O., Mutch S.J., Thevendran G., Well E., Morgan R.J. Radiation exposure and the urologist: what are the risks? J Urol. 2005;173:948–952. doi: 10.1096/01.ju.0000170232.58930.8f.
  24. Lipkin M.E., Wang A.J., Toncheva G., Ferrandino M.N., Yoshisumi T.T., Preminger G.M. Determination of patient radiation dose during ureteroscopic treatment of urolithiasis using validated model. J Urol. 2012;187:920–924. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.159.
  25. Mettler F.A., Huda W., Yoshizumi T.T., Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: A catalog. Radiology. 2008;248:254–263. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2481071451.
  26. Tepeler A., Armagan A., Akman T., Silay M.S., Akcay M., Basibuyuk I. et al. Is fluoroscopic imaging mandatory for endoscopic treatment of ureteral stones? Urology 2012;80:1002–1006. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.02.082.
  27. Zeng G., Traxer O., Zhong W., Osther P., Pearle M.S., Preminger G.M. et al. International Alliance of Urolithiasis guideline on retrograde intrarenal surgery. BJU Int. 2023;131:153–164. doi: 10.1111/bju.15836.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1.

Download (1MB)
3. Fig. 2.

Download (911KB)
4. Fig. 3.

Download (1MB)
5. Fig. 4.

Download (1MB)

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies