Effect of central dialysis fluid delivery system (cdds) using high flux dialyzer versus regular water treatment stations on endotoxemia and inflammatory markers among prevalent patients on regular hemodialysis

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

Purpose. In this study, we compared the effects of a single patient dialysis fluid delivery system (SPDDS) against a continuous dialysis fluid delivery system (CDDS) on inflammatory markers and endotoxemia in a population of patients receiving routine hemodialysis (HD) at Ain Shams University.

Materials and Methods. Eighty prevalent HD patients, ages 18 to 60, who were clinically stable and receiving thrice weekly dialysis treatments via an arteriovenous fistula were the subjects of a cross-sectional research. The study excluded patients with double lumen venous catheters used for hemodialysis, acute infections, cancer, and chronic liver disease. Two groups of patients were created by random selection: group I underwent HD using a CDDS water purification system that was implemented at El Demerdash Hospital two years prior, and group II underwent HD using an SPDDS water purification system at Ain Shams University Specialised Hospital.

Results. In both groups, laboratory, inflammatory marker, and demographic data were gathered. Serum samples were taken before and after dialysis to assess the endotoxin levels in each group. Pre-dialysis endotoxin levels were significantly lower in the CDDS group (0.07±0.05) compared to the SPDDS group (0.20±0.07) with a P value <0.001, and post-dialysis serum endotoxin levels were significantly lower in the CDDS group (0.04±0.02) compared to the SDDPS (0.15±0.03) with a P value <0.001.

Conclusion. According to our research, the CDDS group’s circulating endotoxins had significantly decreased.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Mohamed Ahmed

Ain-Shams University

Email: ahmedtawfik84@med.asu.edu.eg

Lecturer of Internal Medicine and Nephrology. Nephrology department, faculty of medicine

Egito, Cairo

Abd ELhamid Howaida

Ain-Shams University

Email: halshinnawy@yahoo.com

Professor of Internal Medicine and Nephrology. Nephrology department, faculty of medicine

Egito, Cairo

Mohamed Hesham

Ain-Shams University

Email: hesham.elsayed@med.asu.edu.eg

Professor of Internal Medicine and Nephrology. Nephrology department, faculty of medicine

Egito, Cairo

Wahid Heba

Ain-Shams University

Email: hapito@yahoo.com

Professor of Internal Medicine and Nephrology. Nephrology department, faculty of medicine

Egito, Cairo

Mohamed Hoda

Ain-Shams University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: hmhammoda@hotmail.com

Nephrology department, faculty of medicine

Egito, Cairo

Shaban Marwa

Ain-Shams University

Email: marowashabannephrology@med.asu.edu.eg

Lecturer of Internal Medicine and Nephrology. Nephrology department, faculty of medicine

Egito, Cairo

Bibliografia

  1. Sohrabi Z, Eftekhari MH, Eskandari MH, Rezaeianzadeh A and Sagheb MM. Malnutrition-Inflammation Score and Quality of Life in Hemodialysis Patients: Is There Any Correlation? Nephro Urol Mon. 2015; 7(3): e27445.
  2. Jair Munoz Mendoza, Tamara Isakova, Xuan Cai , Liz Y Bayes , Christian Faul , Julia J Scialla , James P Lash , Jing Chen, Jiang He , Sankar Navaneethan , Lavinia Negrea , Sylvia E Rosas , Matthias Kretzler, Lisa Nessel , Dawei Xie , Amanda Hyre Anderson, Dominic S Raj , Myles Wolf. Inflammation and elevated levels of fibroblast growth factor 23 are independent risk factors for death in chronic kidney disease. Kidney International and Clinical investigation. 2017;91(3):711-719.
  3. Bakaloudi DR, Siargkas A, Poulia KA, Dounousi E and Chourdakis M. The Effect of Exercise on Nutritional Status and Body Composition in Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review. Nutrients. 2020;12(10):3071.
  4. Hsu CC, Wei TS, Huang CC and Chen YM. Endotoxemia is associated with acute coronary syndrome in patients with end stage kidney disease. BMC Nephrol. 2017;18(1).
  5. Yamashita T, Yoshida N, Emoto T, Saito Y and Hirata KI. Two Gut Microbiota-Derived Toxins Are Closely Associated with Cardiovascular Diseases: A Review. Toxins. 2021;13(5):297.
  6. Mohammad S, Thiemermann C. Role of Metabolic Endotoxemia in Systemic Inflammation and Potential Interventions. Frontiers in Immunology | www.frontiersin.org.2021; 1191):594150.
  7. Kawanishi H, Moriishi M, Takahashi N and Tsuchiya S. The central dialysis fluid delivery system (CDDS): is it specialty in Japan? Ren Replace Ther. 2016; 2(1).
  8. Hideki Kawanishi, Misaki Moriishi, Naoko Takahashi & Shinichiro Tsuchiya. The central dialysis fluid delivery system (CDDS): is it specialty in Japan? Renal Replacement Therapy. 2016;2(1).
  9. Ikuto Masakane , Hideki Kawanishi, Michio Mineshima, Yoshiaki Takemoto, Junji Uchino, Taketoshi Hoshino, Tadaaki Igoshi, Hideki Hirakata, Tadao Akizawa. 2011 JSDT Standard on the Management of Endotoxin Retentive Filter for Dialysis and Related Therapies. Ther Apher Dial. 2013; 17(2):229–240.
  10. Koda Y and Mineshima M. Advances and Advantages in Recent Central Dialysis Fluid Delivery System. Blood Purif. 2009; 27(1):23–27.
  11. Adrianna Douvris , Khalid Zeid , Swapnil Hiremath , Sean M Bagshaw , Ron Wald, William Beaubien-Souligny , Jennifer Kong , Claudio Ronco , Edward G Clark . Mechanisms for hemodynamic instability related to renal replacement therapy: a narrative review. Intensive Care Med. 2019; 45(10):1333–1346.
  12. Takeshi Hasegawa, Shigeru Nakai, Ikuto Masakane, Yuzo Watanabe, Kunitoshi Iseki,Yoshiharu Tsubakihara and Tadao Akizawa. Dialysis Fluid Endotoxin Level and Mortality in Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Nationwide Cohort Study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;65(6):817–819.
  13. Ibrahim M, Behairy M, El-Ashry M and Mostafa AE. Cardiovascular risk of circulating endotoxin level in prevalent hemodialysis patients. Egypt Heart J. 2018;70(1):27–33.
  14. Christopher W McIntyre , Laura E A Harrison, M Tarek Eldehni, Helen J Jefferies, Cheuk-Chun Szeto, Stephen G John, Mhairi K Sigrist, James O Burton, Daljit Hothi, Shvan Korsheed, Paul J Owen, Ka-Bik Lai, Philip K T Li. Circulating endotoxemia: a novel factor in systemic inflammation and cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6:133–141.
  15. Bonnie Ching-Ha Kwan , Kai-Ming Chow, Terry King-Wing Ma, Phyllis Mei-Shan Cheng, Chi-Bon Leung, Philip Kam-Tao Li, Cheuk-Chun Szeto. Effect of Using Ultrapure Dialysate for Hemodialysis on the Level of Circulating Bacterial Fragment in Renal Failure Patients. Nephron Clin Pract. 2013; 123:246–253.
  16. Elsayed H, Anwar W, Ahmed H and Khedr L. Cytokine Inducing Substances (CIS): Effect of Back filtration on Inflammatory Indices in Hemodialysis. ISN world congress of Nephrology, Mexico City, Sustainability and Diversity. Abstract number WCN17-1695.2017.
  17. Claire H den Hoedt , Michiel L Bots , Muriel P C Grooteman , Neelke C van der Weerd , Albert H A Mazairac , E Lars Penne , Renée Levesque , Piet M ter Wee , Menso J Nubé , Peter J Blankestijn , Marinus A van den Dorpel. Online hemodiafiltration reduces systemic inflammation compared to low – flux hemodialysis . Kidney Int. 2014; 86(2):423–432.
  18. Elsayed HM, Mahmoud BL, Hassan MS and Moustafa AM. Effect of Central Dialysis Fluid Delivery System (CDDS) on IL6 & CRP Levels in Prevalent Haemodialysis Patients. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine. 2021;114(1).
  19. Susantitaphong P, Riella C, Jaber BL. Effect of ultrapure dialysate on markers of inflammation, oxidative stress, nutrition, and anemia parameters: A meta-analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013; 28:438–46.
  20. Rahmati M.A., Homel P., Hoenich N.A., Levin R., Kaysen G.A., Levin N.W. The role of improved water quality on inflammatory markers in patients undergoing regular dialysis. The International Journal of Artificial Organs. 2004;27(8):723–727.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
2. Figure 1. Comparison between CDDS group and SPDDS group regarding endotoxin levels before hemodialysis session

Baixar (40KB)
3. Figure 2. Comparison between CDDS group and SPDDS group regarding endotoxin levels after hemodialysis session

Baixar (37KB)
4. Figure 3. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of end toxin before and after to differentiate between both groups

Baixar (204KB)

Declaração de direitos autorais © Bionika Media, 2024