Long-term functional results of artificial urinary sphincter implantation in men

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

Introduction. Urinary incontinence after radical treatment of prostate cancer causes a significant negative impact on the quality of life. Patients with severe urinary incontinence are most commonly treated with artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement.

Aim. To evaluate the functional results of AUS implantation in patients with severe urinary incontinence at long-term follow-up.

Materials and methods. Between 2004 and 2023, the AUS was implanted in 62 patients with severe stress urinary incontinence. Urinary losses were assessed using a bladder diary. No need to use pads or use of no more than 1 safety pad per day ("social continence") was considered a success, while use of no more than 2 pads, or a reduction in urine loss of more than 50% was regarded as an improvement.

Results. The mean patient age at the time of AUS implantation was 67.4±8 years. Urinary incontinence was most often a complication of radical prostatectomy (61.3%). A history of radiation therapy, previous treatment of urethral stricture, and surgical procedures for urinary incontinence were noted in 14.5%, 48.4%, and 19.4% of patients, respectively. The median follow-up was 73.5 months (IQR 14.8–118.3 months). There was a significant decrease in median urine loss from 900 mL (IQR 700–1100 mL) to 7 mL (IQR 0-35 mL; p<0.05), and a decrease in the number of pads used per day from 7 (IQR 6–8) to 1 (IQR 0-2; p<0.05). The criterion for successful implantation was met in 69.4% of patients, while 43.5% of patients did not use pads. According to the correlation analysis, concomitant diabetes mellitus, history of radiation therapy, surgical treatment of the urethral stricture or urinary incontinence did not have any significant effect on functional results. In addition, there were no cases of AUS revision.

Conclusions. AUS placement in patients with severe stress urinary incontinence allows to achieve satisfactory functional results during long-term follow-up.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

A. Tomilov

Botkin Hospital; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: toandrei33@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9286-5930

Ph.D., assistant professor at the Department of Urology and Surgical Andrology, urologist at Moscow urological center

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow; Moscow

E. Veliev

Botkin Hospital; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education

Email: veliev64@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1249-7224

Ph.D., MD, professor at the Department of Urology and Surgical Andrology of Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Head of the Department of Oncourology at Moscow urological center

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow; Moscow

E. Golubtsova

Botkin Hospital; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education

Email: engolubtsova@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6651-2955

Ph.D., associate professor at the Department of Urology and Surgical Andrology of Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, urologist at Moscow urological center

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow; Moscow

参考

  1. Braun A.E. 3rd, Washington S.L., Cowan J.E., Hampson L.A., Carroll P.R. Impact of Stress Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy on Time to Intervention, Quality of Life and Work Status. Urology. 2023;180:242-248. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.06.027
  2. Veliev E.I., Tomilov A.A. Modern possibilities of diagnosis and treatment of urinary incontinence in men. M. – JSC «Vidal Rus», 2020. Russian (Велиев Е.И., Томилов А.А. Современные возможности диагностики и лечения недержания мочи у мужчин. М. – АО «Видаль Рус», 2020).
  3. Abrams P., Cardoso L., Wagg A., Wein A. (Eds.), Incontinence (7th ed.), International Continence Society, Bristol, UK (2023) ISBN: 978-0-9569607-4-0
  4. Urinary incontinence. Clinical recommendations of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. 2024 65 c. https://apicr.minzdrav.gov.ru/API.ashx?op=GetClinrecPdf&id=8_2 Russian (Недержание мочи. Клинические рекомендации Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации. 2024 г. 65 с. https://apicr.minzdrav.gov.ru/API.ashx?op=GetClinrecPdf&id=8_2 (дата обращения 03.12.2024).
  5. Scott F.B., Bradley W.E., Timm G.W. Treatment of urinary incontinence by an implantable prosthetic urinary sphincter. J Urol 1974;112:75–80.
  6. Schillebeeckx C., Deruyver Y., Beels E., et al. Long-term functional outcomes and patient satisfaction of artificial urinary sphincter implantation for male non-neurogenic incontinence: a retrospective study of 30-year experience in a tertiary centre. Paper presented at: 2021 International Continence Society Annual Meeting; October 14-17, 2021; virtual. Accessed October 20, 2021. https://www.ics.org/2021/abstract/4
  7. Corrales-Acosta E., Corrales M., Arenas-Aquino A. E., Melgarejo-García G. Artificial urinary sphincter outcomes for post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence. A narrative review. Rev Mex Urol. 2022;81(6):pp 1-13
  8. Scott F.B., Bradley W.E., Timm G.W. Treatment of urinary incontinence by implantable prosthetic sphincter. Urology. 1973;1:252–258.
  9. Leibovich B.C., Barrett D.M. Use of the artificial urinary sphincter in men and women. World J. Urol. 1997;15:316–319.
  10. Veliev E.I., Golubtsova E.N., Tomilov A.A. Possibilities of surgical treatment of patients with urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Oncosurgery. 2014;1:17–21. Russian (Велиев Е.И., Голубцова Е.Н., Томилов А.А. Возможности оперативного лечения пациентов с недержанием мочи после радикальной простатэктомии. Онкохирургия. 2014;1:17–21).
  11. Matsushita K., Chughtai B.I., Maschino A.C., Lee R.K., Sandhu J.S International variation in artificial urinary sphincter use. Urology. 2012;80:667–672.
  12. Léon P., Chartier-Kastler E., Rouprêt M., Ambrogi V., Mozer P., Phé V. Long-term functional outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in men with stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2015;115(6):951–57. doi: 10.1111/bju.12848.
  13. Lardas M., Grivas N., Debray T.P.A., et al. Patient- and Tumour-related Prognostic Factors for Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(3):674-689. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.04.020
  14. Veliev E.I., Tomilov A.A., Golubtsova E.N. Long-term results of efficacy and safety of implantation of artificial urinary sphincter AMS 800tm. Bulletin of Urology. 2021;9(1):14–21. Russian (Велиев Е.И., Томилов А.А., Голубцова Е.Н. Долгосрочные результаты эффективности и безопасности имплантации искусственного мочевого сфинктера AMS 800 тм. Вестник урологии. 2021;9(1):14–21).
  15. Boswell T.C., Elliott D.S., Rangel L.J., Linder B.J. Long-term device survival and quality of life outcomes following artificial urinary sphincter placement. Transl Androl Urol. 2020;9(1):56–61. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.08.02. PMID: 32055467; PMCID: PMC6995928.
  16. James M.H., McCammon K.A. Artificial urinary sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence: a review. Int J Urol. 2014;21(6):536–543. doi: 10.1111/iju.12392
  17. Viers B.R., Linder B.J., Rivera M.E., Rangel L.J., Ziegelmann M.J., Elliott D.S. Long-Term Quality of Life and Functional Outcomes among Primary and Secondary Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantations in Men with Stress Urinary Incontinence. J Urol. 2016;196(3):838–43. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.076.
  18. Gousse A.E., Madjar S., Lambert M.M., Fishman I.J. Artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: long-term subjective results. J Urol. 2001;166(5):1755–1758.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载
2. Fig. 1. Causes of urinary incontinence RPE — radical prostatectomy, TURP — transurethral resection of the prostate gland, TPAE — transvesical adenomectomy.

下载 (52KB)
索引源数据
3. Fig. 2. Dynamics of urine loss volumes (A) and the number of pads used (B) before and after IMS installation

下载 (118KB)
索引源数据
4. Fig. 3. The device of the artificial urinary sphincter AMS 800

下载 (236KB)
索引源数据

版权所有 © Bionika Media, 2024