Results of kidney transplantation in patients with end-stage renal disease caused by glomerulonephritis

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Aim. To analyze own 3-year results of kidney transplantation after hemodialysis in patients with chronic glomerulonephritis.

Materials and methods. Living-donor kidney transplantation was performed in 49 patients with end-stage kidney disease. All patients were first-time recipients. They received tacrolimus. After induction immunosuppression, 3-component supportive immunosuppressive therapy was used according to the following scheme: calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus), antiproliferative drug (mycophenolate mofetil; Cellcept) and glucocorticoids (prednisolone). In 16.3% of patients, the nephrotoxic effect of tacrolimus was seen and they were prescribed an mTOR inhibitor (everolimus). Body mass index (BMI), serum creatinine level before and after transplantation, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), panel-reactive antibodies, as well as donor-specific antibodies were determined. Panel-reactive antibodies were detected using Gen-Probe-Lifecodes and Luminex-200 screening kits (Luminex Corporation, Austin, Texas, USA). Detection of donor-specific antibodies in the recipient (DSA-test) was carried out according to the cross-match test. For statistical processing, the statistical package Statistica 16.0, Excel 2016 was used.

Results. The average age of the recipients was 33.61±7.89 years. The duration of hemodialysis was 23.49±14.23 months, in 12.2% of cases transplantation was performed without prior hemodialysis. The mean fluorescence intensities of HLA classes I and II was 249.96±200.57 and 251.48±282.44, respectively. HLA compatibility was 41.16±16.68. Donor-specific antibodies were absent. The average age of donors was 49.39±7.97 years, and 71.4% of donors were first-degree relatives. After 1 day, the serum creatinine level decreased by 53.6% in comparison with the baseline value (p=0.093). After 3 and 7 days, the difference with the initial creatinine level was 72.8% (p=0.027) and 75.7% (p=0.022). In 53.1% of cases, the HLA compatibility was 50.0%. The panel-reactive antibodies were negative in 2.0% of cases. There were no lethal outcomes. Acute cellular and humoral rejection developed in 1 (2.0%) patient. After transplantation, rejection was observed in 5 (10.2%) recipients.

Conclusion. Analysis of our data indicates satisfactory results of kidney transplantation in the Republican Diagnostic and Treatment Center, which indicates the necessity of continuation of the program of transplantation with the analysis of HLA subclasses.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

R. Sholan

Military Hospital, Scientific Experimental Center

Author for correspondence.
Email: reshadsholan@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5891-6327

Ph.D., MD, Head of The Scientific Experimental Center

Azerbaijan, Baku

R. Aliyev

Military Hospital, Scientific Experimental Center

Email: mqos@yandex.com

Ph.D., MD, associate professor, Major General of the Medical Service, Head of State Security Services General Department of Military Medicine

Azerbaijan, Baku

U. Hashimova

Military Hospital, Scientific Experimental Center

Email: ulduz.hashimova@science.az
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7740-0972

Ph.D. in Biology, professor, Director of the Institute

Azerbaijan, Baku

A. Almazkhanli

State Security Service, Military Hospital

Email: almazxanlianar@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-2917-3039

State Security Service, Military Hospital, Department of Kidney Diseases and Organ Transplantation

Azerbaijan, Baku

N. Bakhsheliyeva

State Security Service, Military Hospital

Email: nergiz.baxseliyeva1990@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-1790-9102

State Security Service, Military Hospital, Department of Kidney Diseases and Organ Transplantation

Azerbaijan, Baku

A. Yusifova

State Security Service, Military Hospital

Email: aydanyusifova1990@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-0474-8106

State Security Service, Military Hospital, Department of Kidney Diseases and Organ Transplantation

Azerbaijan, Baku

K. Sefihanova

A. Karayev’s Institute of Physiology, Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences

Email: khatira.safikhanova.74@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-4986-3244
Azerbaijan, Baku

A. Gaisina

A. Karayev’s Institute of Physiology, Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences

Email: aliyagaisina@hotmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3435-9981
Azerbaijan, Baku

N. Mammadova

A. Karayev’s Institute of Physiology, Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences

Email: narminka1@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-3347-3960
Azerbaijan, Baku

References

  1. Hart A, Lentine KL, Smith JM, Miller JM, Skeans MA, Prentice M, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2019 Annual Data Report: Kidney. Am J Transplant. 2021;21(2):21-137. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16502.
  2. Yagisawa T, Mieno M, Ichimaru N, Morita K, Nakamura M, Hotta K, et al. Trends of kidney transplantation in Japan in 2018: data from the kidney transplant registry. Ren Replace Ther. 2019; 5.3:1-14. doi: 10.1186/s41100-019-0199-6
  3. Lorent M, Foucher Y, Kerleau K, Brouard S, Baayen C, Lebouter S, et al. The EKiTE network (epidemiology in kidney transplantation – a European validated database): an initiative epidemiological and translational European collaborative research. BMC Nephrol. 2019;20:365. doi: 10.1186/s12882-019-1522-8
  4. Pinchuk AV, Shmarina NV, Dmitriev IV, Vinogradov VE, Kazantsev AI. Analysis of recipient and graft survival after primary and second kidney transplantation. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2021;23(2):21-29. doi: 10.15825/1995-1191-2021-2-21-29. Russian (Пинчук АВ, Шмарина НВ, Дмитриев ИВ, Виноградов ВЕ, Казанцев АИ. Анализ выживаемости реципиентов и трансплантатов после первичной и повторной трансплантации почки. Вестник трансплантологии и искусственных органов. 2021;23(2):21-29. doi: 10.15825/1995-1191-2021-2-21-29).
  5. GBD Chronic Kidney Disease Collaboration. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2020; published online Feb 13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30045-3.
  6. Kennard AL, Jiang SH, Walters GD. Increased glomerulonephritis recurrence after living related donation. BMC Nephrol. 2017;18:25. doi: 10.1186/s12882-016-0435-z
  7. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Transplant Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2009;9 Suppl 3:S1-155. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02834.x.
  8. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:461-70. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00002
  9. Bobart SA, Alexander MP, Bentall A. Recurrent Glomerulonephritis in the Kidney Allograft. Indian J Nephrol. 2020; 30(6): 359–369. doi: 10.4103/ijn.IJN_193_19
  10. Allen P, Chadban S, Craig JC, Lim WH, Allen RDM, Clayton PA. et al. Recurrent glomerulonephritis after kidney transplantation: risk factors and allograft outcomes. Kidney International. 2017;92:461–469. DOI: 10.1016/ j.kint.2017.03.015
  11. Jiang SH, Kennard AL, Walters GD. Recurrent glomerulonephritis following renal transplantation and impact on graft survival. BMC Nephrol. 2018;19:344. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-1135-7
  12. Ruhi Ç, Tuğcu M, Kasapoğlu U, Boynueğri B, Gümrükçü G, Ata P. et al. The Influence of Preformed Hla Class I and II Panel Reactive Antibodies on Clinical and Pathological Outcomes of Kidney Allograft. Turkish Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Journal. 2016;25:73-78. doi: 10.5262/tndt.2016.1001.08
  13. Schinstock C.A., Gandhi M.J., Stegall M.D. Interpreting Anti-HLA Antibody Testing Data: A Practical Guide for Physicians. Transplantation. 2016;100(8):1619–1628. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001203
  14. Belyuk K.S., Mogilevets E.V., Povolanskiy YuI., Sonchik A.K., Pyshko A.Y., Barkova O.N., et al. Analysis of kidney transplantation results in patients with chronic renal disease. Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation. 2019;11(1):61–70. doi: 10.23873/2074-0506-2019-11-1-61-70. Russian (Белюк К.С., Могилевец Э.В., Поволанский Ю.И., Сончик А.К., Пышко А.Я., Баркова О.Н. и др. Анализ результатов трансплантации почки у пациентов с хронической почечной недостаточностью. Трансплантология. 2019;11(1):61–70. doi: 10.23873/2074-0506-2019-11-1-61-70).
  15. Vatazin AV, Zulkarnaev AB, Stepanov VA. Survival analysis of patients in the waiting list for kidney transplantation in terms of competing risks. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2019;21(1):35-45. doi: 10.15825/1995-1191-2019-1-35-45. Russian (Ватазин АВ, Зулькарнаев АБ, Степанов ВА. Анализ выживаемости пациентов в листе ожидания трансплантации почки с позиции конкурирующих рисков. Вестник трансплантологии и искусственных органов. 2019;21(1):35-45. doi: 10.15825/1995-1191-2019-1-35-45).
  16. Kaliyev AA, Zhakiyev ВS, Sultangereyev EВ, Rysmakhanov MS, Elemesov AA, Almyrzauly Z, et al. Results of kidney transplantation in Aktobe region of Kazakhstan. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2018;20(1):66-69. doi: 10.15825/1995-1191-2018-1-66-69. Russian (Калиев А.А., Жакиев Б.C., Султангереев Е.Б., Рысмаханов М.С., Елемесов А.А., Алмурзаулы Ж. и др. Результаты трансплантации почек в Актюбинской области Казахстана. Вестник трансплантологии и искусственных органов. 2018;20(1):66-69. doi: 10.15825/1995-1191-2018-1-66-69).
  17. Lee HS, Kang M, Kim B, Park Y. Outcomes of kidney transplantation over a 16-year period in Korea: An analysis of the National Health Information Database. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(2): e0247449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247449

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2024 Bionika Media