De novo pelvic dysfunctions after vaginal urogynecological surgeries

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

The goal of vaginal reconstructive surgery is to address pelvic issues. Surgical procedures can greatly enhance the lives of many women by alleviating symptoms and improving their overall well-being. However, there are instances where women experience pelvic dysfunction for the first time — new or worsening symptoms in the pelvic area that emerge following surgery. The purpose of the review is to summarize current knowledge, identify existing gaps and suggest future research directions aimed at minimizing iatrogenic morbidity and improving the quality of life of patients. A search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. The search queries included various combinations of the following keywords: «pelvic floor dysfunction», «urogynecology», «vaginal surgery», «pelvic organ prolapse», «stress urinary incontinence», «overactive bladder», «de novo», «postoperative complications», «urination dysfunction», «dyspareunia», «fecal incontinence», «quality of life», «synthetic mesh», «repair with native tissues» and «results of surgical intervention». The search was limited to English-language publications from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2024 (including articles published in early 2025). Literature data convincingly indicate that a significant proportion of women who have undergone urogynecological vaginal surgery develop de novo pelvic dysfunctions. The etiology of de novo pelvic dysfunction is complex and multifactorial, including nerve injury, mesh-related complications, altered pelvic floor biomechanics, pre-existing subclinical dysfunction, and psychological factors. Identifying risk factors and implementing strategies to prevent and effectively treat new dysfunction are critical to optimizing surgical outcomes and patient well-being.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Bella Ausheva

Russian University of Medicine of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; Botkin’s Hospital Moscow Urological Center

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: bellausheva@mail.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-2023-2605

M.D., Urologist, Obstetrician-gynecologist, Postgrad. Student Dept. of Urology

Rússia, Moscow; Moscow

George Kasyan

Russian University of Medicine of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; Botkin’s Hospital Moscow Urological Center

Email: g.kasyan@outlook.com
ORCID ID: 0000-0001-7919-2217

M.D., Dr.Sc.(Med), Prof., Dept. of Urology

Rússia, Moscow; Moscow

Dmitry Pushkar

Russian University of Medicine of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; Botkin’s Hospital Moscow Urological Center

Email: pushkardm@mail.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-6096-5723

M.D., Dr.Sc.(Med), Full Prof.,Acad. of the RAS, Head, Dept. of Urology

Rússia, Moscow; Moscow

Bibliografia

  1. Lo TS, Shailaja N, Hsieh WC, Uy-Patrimonio MC, Yusoff FM, Ibrahim R. Predictors of voiding dysfunction following extensive vaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(4):575-582. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3144-z.
  2. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Marjoribanks J. Transvaginal mesh or grafts compared with native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2(2):CD012079. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012079. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 13;3:CD012079. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012079.pub2
  3. Wu JM, Dieter AA, Pate V, Jonsson Funk M. Cumulative Incidence of a Subsequent Surgery After Stress Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Procedure. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(6):1124-1130. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002051.
  4. Serna-Gallegos T, Dutta S, Crowder C, Wadensweiler P, Whitcomb EL, Guaderrama NM. Risk Factors for De Novo Overactive Bladder After Midurethral Sling. Urogynecology (Phila). 2024;30(1):59-64. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001380.
  5. Verma V, Savickaite K, Rajshekhar S, Pradhan A. Risk factors for postoperative voiding dysfunction following surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;263:127-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.06.011.
  6. Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR. Sexual function and vaginal anatomy in women before and after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;182(6):1610-5. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.107436.
  7. Farag F, Osman NI, Pang KH, Castro-Diaz D, Chapple CR, Cruz F, Gamé X, Goldman H, Greenwell T, Hampel C, Scailteux LM, Roovers JP, Welk B, Heesakkers J. Complications of Synthetic Midurethral Slings: Is There a Relevant Discrepancy Between Observational Data and Clinical Trials? Eur Urol Focus. 2024;10(4):535-550. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.11.002.
  8. Frigerio, M., Mastrolia, S.A., Spelzini, F. et al. Long-term effects of episiotomy on urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 299, 317–325 (2019). doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-5009-9
  9. Krutova VA, Tarabanova OV, Khachetsukova AA, Khalaphyan AA. Postoperative pelvic dysfunctions associated with the reconstruction of the pelvic floor. Minerva Ginecol. 2020;72(4):202-211. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04532-3.
  10. Doumouchtsis SK, de Tayrac R, Lee J, Daly O, Melendez-Munoz J, Lindo FM, Cross A, White A, Cichowski S, Falconi G, Haylen B. An International Continence Society (ICS)/International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) joint report on the terminology for the assessment and management of obstetric pelvic floor disorders. Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Jan;34(1):1-42. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05397-x.
  11. Mateu-Arrom L, Gutiérrez-Ruiz C, Palou Redorta J, Errando-Smet C. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair with Mesh: Description of Surgical Technique Using the Surelift® Anterior Repair System. Urol Int. 2021;105(1-2):137-142. doi: 10.1159/000510530.
  12. Petros PEP. Late-occurring pain/other dysfunctions in midurethral sling class actions are likely caused by uterosacral ligament weakness, not implant or surgeon. Neurourol Urodyn. 2022;41(6):1207-1215. doi: 10.1002/nau.24925.
  13. Peinado Molina RA, Martínez Vázquez S, Martínez Galiano JM, Rivera Izquierdo M, Khan KS, Cano-Ibáñez N. Prevalence of depression and anxiety in women with pelvic floor dysfunctions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024;167(2):507-528. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15719.
  14. Wihersaari O, Karjalainen P, Tolppanen AM, Mattsson N, Nieminen K, Jalkanen J. Sexual Activity and Dyspareunia After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: A 5-Year Nationwide Follow-up Study. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022;45:81-89. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.09.014.
  15. Rodrigues Â, Rodrigues C, Negrão L, Afreixo V, Castro MG. Female sexual function and quality of life after pelvic floor surgery: a prospective observational study. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(5):1273-1283. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04678-1.
  16. Tommaselli GA, Di Carlo C, Formisano C, Fabozzi A, Nappi C. Medium‐term and long‐term outcomes following placement of midurethral slings for stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(9):1253‐1268. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2645-5
  17. Szymanowski P, Banach P, Wisniewski A, Szepieniec WK. The impact of cystocele repair on urge symptoms in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Ginekol Pol. 2022 doi: 10.5603/GP.a2022.0008.
  18. Vereeck S, Pacquée S, De Wachter S, Jacquemyn Y, Neels H, Dietz HP. The effect of prolapse surgery on voiding function. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(9):2141-2146. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05520-6.
  19. Fatton B, de Tayrac R, Letouzey V, Huberlant S. Pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function. Nat Rev Urol. 2020;17(7):373-390. doi: 10.1038/s41585-020-0334-8
  20. Sheridan W, Da Silva AS, Leca BM, Ostarijas E, Patel AG, Aylwin SJ, Vincent RP, Panagiotopoulos S, El-Hasani S, le Roux CW, Miras AD, Cardozo L, Dimitriadis GK. Weight loss with bariatric surgery or behaviour modification and the impact on female obesity-related urine incontinence: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Obes. 2021;11(4):e12450. doi: 10.1111/cob.12450
  21. Chen A, McIntyre B, De EJB. Management of Postoperative Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) After Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) Repair. Curr Urol Rep. 2018;19(9):74. doi: 10.1007/s11934-018-0825-9
  22. Thompson J.C., Rogers R.G. Surgical management for pelvic organ prolapse and its impact on sexual function. Sex Med Rev. 2016;4:213–220. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2016.02.002.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Declaração de direitos autorais © Bionika Media, 2025