Pathomorphological features of prostate diseases


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Currently, the «gold» standard for the diagnosis of PCa is a histological examination of biopsy specimens obtained by transrectal ultrasound guided prostate fine-needle biopsy. As a result, a greater number of tumors have been detected at early stages (T1c). The key point is the correct preparation of microsections and their subsequent examination.

Full Text

Restricted Access

References

  1. Rogatsch H., Moser P., Volgger H. et al. Diagnostic effect of an improved preembedding method of prostate needle biopsy specimens. Hum. Pathol. 2000; 31: 1102-1107.
  2. Delahunt B, Nacey J.N. Broadsheet number 45: thin core biopsy of prostate. Pathol. 1998; 30: 247-256.
  3. Humphrey P.A. Prostate pathology. Chicago. 2007: 556.
  4. Ohori M., Kattan M., Scardinio P.T. et al. Radical Prostatectomy for carcinoma of the prostate. Mod. Pathol. 2004; 17: 349-359.
  5. Oliali B.R., Kahane H., Epstein J.I. Can basal cells be seen in adenocarcinoma of the prostate? An immunohistochemical study using high molecular weight cytoceratin (clone 34betaE12) antibody. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2002; 26: 1151-1160.
  6. Srigley J.R., Jones B., Kapusta L. The effect of specimen submission protocols on the detection rate of histologic abnormalities in sextant prostate biopsies (abstract). Mod. Pathol. 2001; 14: 123.
  7. Lane R.B., Lane C.G., Mangold K.A. et al. Needle biopsy of prostate. What constitutes adequate histologic sampling? Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 1998; 122: 833-835.
  8. Murthy W.M., Ramsey J., Soloway M.S. Abetter nuclear fixative for diagnostic bladder and prostate biopsies.J Urol. Pathol. 1993; 1: 79-87.
  9. Reyes A.J., Humphrey P.A. Diagnostic effect of complete histologic sampling of prostate needle biopsy specimens. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1998; 109: 416-422.
  10. Kao J., Upton M., Zhang P. et al. Individual prostate biopsy core (Bc) embedding facilitates maximal tissue representation. J. Urol. 2002; 168: 496-499.
  11. Brat D.J., Wills M.L., Lecksell K.L. et al. How often are diagnostic feartures missed less extensive sampling of prostate needle biopsy specimens? Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1999; 23: 257-262.
  12. Kwast T.H. Lopez C., Santonia et al. Guidelines for processing and reporting of prostatic needle biopsies. Am. J Clin. Pathol. 2003; 56: 336-340.
  13. Boccon-Gibod L., Kwast T.H., Montironi R. et al. Handling and reporting of prostate biopsies. Eur. Urol. 2004; 46: 177-181.
  14. Coard K.S., Freeman V.L. Gleason grading of prostate cancer. Am. J Clin. Pathol. 2004; 122: 373-376.
  15. Magi-Galluzzi C., Schoenfield L., Klein E. Serum PSA level correlates with the needle biopsy extent of atrophy and chronic inflammation, but not with high grade PIN and prostate cancer. Mod. Pathol. 2005; 18(sp. 1): 154A.
  16. Terris M.K., Pham T.Q., Issa M.M. et al. Routine transition zone and seminal vesicle biopsies in all patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsies are not indicated. J. Urol. 1997; 157: 204-206.
  17. Epstein J.I. Pathologic assessment of the surgical specimen. Urol. Clin. North Am. 2001; 28: 567-594.
  18. Ayala A.G., Naya Y., Tamboli P. et al. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and invasive adenocarcinoma: case report and preliminary study of 103 patients with high-grade PIN. Pathol. Case Rev. 2003; 8: 61-67.
  19. Bishara T., Rammani D.M., Epstein J.I. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on needle biopsy. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2004; 28: 629-633.
  20. Gleason D.F. Histologic grading of prostate cancer. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2004; 122: 373-376.
  21. Reyes A.O., Swanson P.E., Carbone J.M. et al. Unusual histological types of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1997; 21: 1215-1222.
  22. Srodon M., Epstein J.I. Central zone histology of the prostate: a mimicker of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Hum. Pathol. 2002; 33: 518-523.
  23. Humphrey P.A. Gleason grading and prognostic factors in carcinoma of the prostate. Mod. Pathol. 2004; 17: 292-306.
  24. Gleason D.F. Histologic grading of prostate cancer: a perspective. Hum. Pathol. 1992; 23: 373-376.
  25. Cangiano T.G., Litwin M.S., Naitoh J. et al. Intraoperative frozen section monitoring of nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J. Urol. 1999; 162: 655-658.
  26. Sehdev A.E., Pan C.C. Epstein J.I. Comparative analysis of sampling methods for grossing radical prostatectomy specimens performed for nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostatic adenocarcinoma. Hum. Pathol. 2001; 32: 494-499.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2013 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies