Replacement plastic reconstruction of extended ureteral stricture using buccal mucosa autograft


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The potentials for the use of free buccal mucosa graft in reconstruction plastic surgery of extended uretral stricture are evaluated. From 2007 to 2013, 9 operations in 8 patients (mean age 54,5±7,2 years) were performed. The average length of cicatricial uretral stricture was 5,1±0,7 cm. 1 patient has lesion in the upper third of the ureter, 4 patients - in the middle portion, and 4 patients - at the bottom portion. The causes of extended uretral stricture were following: long standing calculi (n=3), ureteral injury after ureterolithotripsy (n=2) and after bringing down the calcuus using loop (n=1), radiotherapy (n=3, one patient had bilateral injury). All patients underwent plastic reconstruction of ureter using buccal mucosa graft by «on-lay» type. During the follow-up (median, 42 months, from 3 to 72 months), in 7 (88,9 %) of 8 patients (8 operations) ureteral strictures relapses were not observed. They all had satisfactory renal excretory function without the pronounced violations of passage of urine along the ureter. The excretory urography showed moderate expansion of the ureter at the site of operation in 6 of them. Due to the progression of secondary renal scarring, one patient underwent nephrectomy 1.5 year after reconstruction plastic surgery. In this patient, pronounced anatomical and functional changes in the kidney occurred before the operation. Application of the buccal mucosa graft in reconstruction plastic surgery in extended uretral stricture is high effective due to the relatively low level of early and late postoperative complications and low recurrence rate.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

M. F Trapeznikova

SBHCI MR Moscow Regional Scientific Research Clinical Institute n.a. M.F. Vladimirsky

V. V Bazaev

SBHCI MR Moscow Regional Scientific Research Clinical Institute n.a. M.F. Vladimirsky

A. N Shibaev

SBHCI MR Moscow Regional Scientific Research Clinical Institute n.a. M.F. Vladimirsky

A. G Lukyanchikov

MHCI Serpukhov City Hospital n.a. N.A. Semashko

A. V Vinogradov

SBHCI MR Moscow Regional Scientific Research Clinical Institute n.a. M.F. Vladimirsky

researcher at the urological clinic.

References

  1. Лоран О.Б. Реконструктивная урология: достижения и перспективы. Материалы XII съезда Российского общества урологов. М., 2012. С. 351-353.
  2. Комяков Б.Л., Гулиев Б.Г. Хирургия протяженных сужений мочеточников. СПб.: Диалект, 2005.
  3. Benson M.C., Ring K.S., Olsson C.A. Ureteral reconstruction and bypass: experience with ileal interposition, the Boari flap-psoas hitch and renal autotransplantation. J Urol. 1990;143(1):20-23.
  4. Filipas D., Fisch M., Fichtner J. et al. The histology and immunohistochemistry of free buccal mucosa and full-skin grafts after exposure to urine. BJU Int. 1999;84(1):108-11.
  5. Peterson A.C., Webster G.D. Management of urethral stricture disease: developing options for surgical intervention. BJU Int. 2004; 94:971-976.
  6. Кудрявцев Л.А. Оперативные методы лечения последствий травм уретры. Самара. 1993.
  7. Сапежко К.М. К лечению дефектов уретры с использованием лоскута слизистой. Хирургическая летопись 1894;4:775-784.
  8. Humby G. A one-stage operation for hyposadius repair. Br J Surg. 1941;29:84-92.
  9. el-Kasaby A.W., Fath-Alla M., Noweir A.M. et al. The use of buccal mucosa patch graft in the management of anterior urethral strictures. J Urol. 1993;149(2):276-78.
  10. Fransis K., Vander Eeckt K., Van Poppel H. et al. Results of buccal mucosa grafts for repairing long bulbar urethral strictures. BJU Int. 2009;105:1170-1172.
  11. Трапезникова М.Ф., Базаев В.В., Лукьянчиков А.Г. и др. Пластика протяженных рецидивных стриктур передней уретры свободным трансплантатом буккальной слизистой. Урология. 2006;1:3-7.
  12. Bhargava S., Chapple C.R. Buccal mucosal urethroplasty: is it the new gold standard? BJU Int. 2004;93(9):1191-1193.
  13. Somerville J.J., Naude J.H. Segmental ureteric replacement: an animal study using a free non-pedicled graft. Urol. Res. 1984;12(2):115-119.
  14. Naude J.H. Buccal mucosal grafts in the treatment of ureteric lesions. BJU Int. 1999;83(7):751-754.
  15. Bonfig R., Gerharz E.W., Riedmiller H. Ideal ureteric replacement in complex reconstruction of the urinary tract. BJU Int. 2004; 93(4):575-580.
  16. Shah S.A., Ranka P., Visnagara M. et al. Use of buccal mucosa as onlay graft technique for benign ureteric strictures. Indian J Urol 2003; 20:28-32.
  17. Базаев В.В., Трапезникова М.Ф. Способ хирургического лечения протяженных стриктур и облитераций мочеточника. Патент на изобретение № 2407463 от 27.12.2010. Приоритет изобретения 30.07.2009.
  18. Трапезникова М.Ф., Базаев В.В., Шибаев А.Н. и др. Первый успешный опыт применения буккальной слизистой при пластике протяженной стриктуры мочеточника. Тезисы докладов в материалах XI съезда урологов России. М., 2007. C. 606-607.
  19. Kroepfl D., Loewen H., Klevecka V. et al. Treatment of long ureteric strictures with buccal mucosal grafts. BJU Int. 2010;105(10):1452-1455.
  20. Badawy A.A., Abolyosr A., Saleem M.D. et al. Buccal mucosa graft for ureteral stricture substitution: initial experience. Urology. 2010;76(4):971-975.
  21. Лоран О.Б., Велиев Е.И., Котов С.В. и др. Выбор оптимального свободного лоскута для заместительной уретропластики при протяженных стриктурах уретры. Урология, 2011;4:11-416.
  22. Agrawal V., Dassi V., Andankar M.G. Buccal mucosal graft onlay repair for a ureteric ischemic injury following a pyeloplasty. Indian J Urol. 2010;26(1):120-122.
  23. Sadhu S., Pandit K., Roy M.K. et al. Buccal mucosa ureteroplasty for the treatment of complex ureteric injury. Indian J Surg. 2011;73(1):71-72.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2014 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies