Oncological safety of nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of histopathological outcomes and recurrence-free survival
- Authors: Sokolov E.A1,2, Veliev E.I1,2, Bogdanov A.B1,2, Veliev R.A1, Goncharuk D.A1
-
Affiliations:
- Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
- S.P. Botkin’s State Clinical Hospital
- Issue: No 2 (2020)
- Pages: 60-65
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/1728-2985/article/view/312515
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18565/urology.2020.2.60-64
- ID: 312515
Cite item
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text
About the authors
E. A Sokolov
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; S.P. Botkin’s State Clinical Hospital
Email: sokolov.yegor@yandex.ru
E. I Veliev
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; S.P. Botkin’s State Clinical Hospital
Email: veliev@urotop.ru
A. B Bogdanov
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; S.P. Botkin’s State Clinical Hospital
Email: abbogdanov@hotmail.com
R. A Veliev
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Email: ragifvel@mail.ru
D. A Goncharuk
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Email: gonch.urology@yandex.ru
References
- Bekelman J.E., Rumble R.B., Chen R.C. et al. Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement of an American Urological Association/American Society for Radiation Oncology/Society of Urologic Oncology Guideline. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018;36(32):3251-3258. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1800606.
- Lardas M., Liew M., van den Bergh R.C. et al. Quality of Life Outcomes after Primary Treatment for Clinically Localised Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Eur. Urol. 2017;72(6):869-885. Doi: 10.1016/j. eururo.2017.06.035.
- Avulova S., Zhao Z., Lee D. et al. The Effect of Nerve Sparing Status on Sexual and Urinary Function: 3-Year Results from the CEASAR Study. J. Urol. 2018;199(5):1202-1209. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.037.
- Mottet N., Bellmunt J., Bolla M. et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur. Urol. 2017;71(4):618-629. Doi: 10.1016/j. eururo.2017.08.003
- Bonet X., Ogaya-Pinies G., Woodlief T. et al. Nerve-sparing in salvage robot-assisted prostatectomy: surgical technique, oncological and functional outcomes at a single high-volume institution. BJU Int. 2018;122(5):837-844. doi: 10.1111/bju.145178.
- Walz J., Epstein J.I., Ganzer R. et al. A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2016;70(2):301-311. Doi: 10.1016/j. eururo.2016.01.026.
- Preston M.A., Breau R.H., Lantz A.G. et al. The association between nerve sparing and a positive surgical margin during radical prostatectomy. Urol. Oncol. 2015;33(1):18.e1-18.e6. Doi: 10.1016/j. urolonc.2014.09.006.
- Zhang L., Wu B., Zha Z. et al. Positive surgical margin is associated with biochemical recurrence risk following radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis from high-quality retrospective cohort series. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2018;16(1):124-136. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1433-3.
- Rayn K.N., Bloom J.B., Gold S.A. et al. Added Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Clinical Nomograms for Predicting Adverse Pathology in Prostate Cancer. J. Urol. 2018;200(5): 1041- 1047. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.05.094.
- Weng H., Zeng X.T., Li S. et al. Intrafascial versus interfascial nerve sparing in radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 2017;7(1):11454. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11878-7.
- Геворгян Г.С., Костин А.А., Воробьев Н.В. и соавт. Анатомия сосудисто-нервного пучка и методы её сохранения при нервосберегающей простатэктомии. Исследования и практика в медицине. 2018;5(3):53-66) doi: 10.17709/2409-2231-2018-5-3-5.
- Nguyen L.N., Head L., Witiuk K. et al. The Risks and Benefits of Cavernous Neurovascular Bundle Sparing during Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Urol. 2017;198(4):760-69. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.3344.
- Kumar A., Samavedi S., Bates A.S. et al. Safety of selective nerve-sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J. Robot. Surg. 2017; 11(2): 129-138. Doi: 10.1007/ s.11701-016-0627-3.
- Медведев В.Л., Лысенко В.В., Роша Л.Г. и соавт. Влияние дооперационного стадирования рака предстательной железы на частоту позитивного хирургического края после радикальной простатэктомии. Инновационная медицина Кубани. 2018;2(10):13-16.
- Audenet F., Rozet F., Resche-Rigon M. et al. Grade Group Underestimation in Prostate Biopsy: Predictive Factors and Outcomes in Candidates for Active Surveillance. Clin. Genitourin. Cancer. 2017; 15(6):e907-e913. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.04.024.
- Schiavina R., Bianchi L., Borghesi M. et al. MRI Displays the Prostatic Cancer Anatomy and Improves the Bundles Management Before Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. J. Endourol. 2018;32(4):315- 321. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0701.
- Druskin S.C., Liu J.J., Young A. et al. Prostate MRI prior to radical prostatectomy: effects on nerve sparing and pathological margin status. Res. Rep. Urol. 2017;9:55-63. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S128499.
- Гончарук Д.А., Велиев Е.И., Соколов Е.А. и соавт. Оценка потенциала измеряемого коэффициента диффузии мультипараметрической магнитно-резонансной томографии в определении низкой степени злокачественности рака предстательной железы после радикальной простатэктомии. Consilium Medicum. 2018;20(7): 15-19). doi: 10.26442/2075-1753_2018.7.15-19.
- Martini A., Gupta A., Lewis S.C. et al. Development and internal validation of a side-specific, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based nomogram for the prediction of extracapsular extension of prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2018;122(6):1025-1033. doi: 10.1111/bju.14353.
- Nyarangi-Dix J., Wiesenfarth M., Bonekamp D. et al. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Prediction of Extraprostatic Disease-A Risk Model for Patient-tailored Risk Stratification When Planning Radical Prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. Focus. 2018;4569(18):30336-30335. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.11.004.
- Martini A., Cumarasamy S., Haines K.G. III, Tewari A.K. An updated approach to incremental nerve sparing for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2018; doi: 10.1111/bju.14655.
- Schlomm T., Tennstedt P., Huxhold C. et al. Neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) increases nerve-sparing frequency and reduces positive surgical margins in open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience after 11,069 consecutive patients. Eur. Urol.2012;62(2):333-340. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.04.057.
- Mirmilstein G., Rai B.P., Gbolahan O. et al. The neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) approach to nerve sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a British setting - a prospective observational comparative study. BJU Int. 2018;121(6):854-862. doi: 10.1111/bju.14078.
- Oxley J., Bray A., Rowe E. Could a Mohs technique make NeuroSAFE a viable option? BJU Int. 2018; 122(3):358-359. Doi: 10.1111/ bju.14377.
- Yoon Y., Jeon S.H., Park Y.H. et al. Visualization of prostatic nerves by polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Biomedical Optics Express. 2016;7(9):3170-3183. doi: 10.1364/BOE.7.003170.
- Panarello D., Comperat E., Seyde O. et al. Atlas of Ex Vivo Prostate Tissue and Cancer Images Using Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy: A Project for Intraoperative Positive Surgical Margin Detection During Radical Prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. Focus. 2019. Doi: 10.1016/j. euf.2019.01.004.