Recurrent varicocele: causes and treatment

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Introduction. Among the different options for varicocele surgery, microsurgical varicocelectomy demonstrates the best results, but a relapse is subsequently detected in 1–3% of cases. It was previously believed that the cause of recurrence lies in the presence of various sources of venous outflow from the testicle, but recent studies show that the collaterals of the gonadal vein are the main reason of recurrence.

Purpose of the study: to determine the leading cause of recurrence, to evaluate the effectiveness and optimal surgical tactics depending on the method of primary treatment.

Materials and methods. Surgical treatment of 74 patients with recurrent varicocele was performed for 5 years. Depending on the method of primary treatment, two groups were formed: 1 – relapse after non-microsurgical varicocelectomy (n=37), 2 – relapse after microsurgical varicocelectomy (n=37). Patients of the first group underwent microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy. Patients of the second group underwent endovascular surgery or redo microsurgical varicocelectomy.

Results. 1 group. Scrotal pain syndrome was relieved in 90% of cases (n=18). Among patients with complaints of infertility (n=8), natural pregnancy occurred in 57,1% (n=4). An improvement in sperm parameters was found among 18 (75%) patients with pathospermia. The US-recurrence rate was 5.4% (n=2), clinical manifestation revealed in 1 case (2,7%). Intraoperatively, preserved branches of the gonadal vein were detected in all cases.

2 group. Scrotal pain syndrome was relieved in 95,8% of cases (n=23). Among patients with complaints of infertility (n=11), natural pregnancy occurred in 27,3% (n=3). An improvement in sperm parameters was found among 14 (73,7%) patients with pathospermia. The US recurrence rate after repeated microsurgery was 13% (n=3), after endovascular intervention – 38.5% (n=5). Clinical manifestation and indications for reoperation were identified in one patient who underwent endovascular embolization. Other cases of the second recurrence were subclinical, no indications for surgical treatment were identified. Renospermatic reflux was determined in all cases of phlebographic recurrence confirmation. No patients with ileospermatic reflux, as well as May-Turner syndrome, were identified. In 8 cases of phlebography, there was no technical possibility to perform embolization; in 3 patients, recurrence was not confirmed. Always the intact gonadal vein branches were identified mainly in the immediate vicinity of the testicular artery, in case of repeated microsurgical operation. There were no cases of testicular atrophy or postoperative hydrocele in any of the groups.

Conclusion. Missing collaterals from the gonadal vein basin play a key role in the genesis of varicocele recurrence. When choosing a surgical treatment option for patients with recurrent varicocele, it is necessary to take into account the method of primary treatment. The main factor to minimize the recurrence risk is the obligatory using of microsurgical techniques and a thorough revision of the spermatic cord components during the primary operation.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

S. V. Kotov

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; N.I. Pirogov First City hospital

Email: urokotov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3764-6131

Dr.Sc., Head of the Department of Urology and Andrology

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

N. D. Korochkin

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; N.I. Pirogov First City hospital

Author for correspondence.
Email: nikoro4kin@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9075-2948

postgraduate of the Department of Urology and Andrology of Medical Faculty, urologist

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

A. V. Vasilyiev

N.I. Pirogov First City hospital

Email: drvasilevav@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3881-6107

head of the Department of X-ray surgical methods of diagnosis and treatment №2

Russian Federation, Moscow

M. M. Iritsyan

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; N.I. Pirogov First City hospital

Email: misha-res@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6271-0556

PhD, assistant of the Department of Urology and Andrology, urologist

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

References

  1. Ahvlediani N.D., Reva I.A., Chernushenko A.S. Varicocele: role in the development of male infertility and surgical treatment techniques. Urologiia. 2020;4;111–118. Russian (Ахвледиани Н.Д., Рева И.А., Чернушенко А.С. Варикоцеле: роль в развитии мужского бесплодия и методики хирургического лечения. Урология. 2020;4;111–118). doi: 10.18565/urology.2020.4.111-118.
  2. Wishahi M.M. Anatomy of the spermatic venous plexus (pampiniform plexus) in men with and without varicocele: intraoperative venographic study. J Urol. 1992;147(5):1285–1289. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37544-4. PMID: 1569670.
  3. Franco G., Iori F., de Dominicis C., Dal Forno S., Mander A., Laurenti C. Challenging the role of cremasteric reflux in the pathogenesis of varicocele using a new venographic approach. J Urol. 1999;161(1):117–121. PMID: 10037382.
  4. Franco G., Leonardo C. Is selective internal spermatic venography necessary in detecting recurrent varicocele after surgical repair? Eur Urol. 2002;42(2):192–193. doi: 10.1016/s0302-2838(02)00262-2.
  5. Jargiello T., Drelich-Zbroja A., Falkowski A., Sojka M., Pyra K., Szczerbo-Trojanowska M. Endovascular transcatheter embolization of recurrent postsurgical varicocele: anatomic reasons for surgical failure. Acta Radiologica. 2015;56(1):63–69. doi: 10.1177/0284185113519624.
  6. WHO Manual for the Standardized Investigation and Diagnosis of the Infertile Couple. 2000, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/infertility/ 9780521431361/en/
  7. Bahren W., Lenz M., Porst H., Wierschin W. Side-effects, complications and contra-indications of percutaneous sclerotherapy of the internal spermatic vein for the treatment of idiopathic varicoceles. Fortschr Rontgenstr. 1983;138:172–179. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1055705.
  8. Murray R.R. Jr, Mitchell S.E., Kadir S., Kaufman S.L., Chang R., Kinnison M.L., Smyth J.W., White R.I. Jr. Comparison of recurrent varicocele anatomy following surgery and percutaneous balloon occlusion. J Urol. 1986;135(2):286–289. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)45615-1.
  9. Wein A.J., Kavoussi L.R., Partin A.W., Peters C.A. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders. 2016;4168.
  10. Coolsaet B.L. The varicocele syndrome: venography determining the optimal level for surgical management. J Urol. 1980;124(6):833–839. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55688-8. PMID: 7441834.
  11. Goldstein M., Gilbert B.R., Dicker A.P., Dwosh J., Gnecco C. Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with delivery of the testis: an artery and lymphatic sparing technique. J Urol. 1992;148(6):1808–1811. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37035-0. PMID: 1433614.
  12. Ramasamy R., Schlegel P. N. Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with and without testicular delivery. Urology. 2006;68:1323–1326. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.08.1113.
  13. Kadurina T.I. Hereditary collagenopathies: clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. SPb.: Nevskii dialekt, 2000;270 p. Russian (Кадурина Т.И. Наследственные коллагенопатии: клиника, диагностика, лечение, диспансеризация. СПб.: Невский диалект, 2000;270 с.).
  14. Studennikova V.V., Severgina L.O., Ismailov M.T. Current view on the varicocele pathogenesis and the problem of the development of its relapses. Urologiia. 2018;1;150-154. Russian (Студенникова В.В., Севергина Л.О., Исмаилов М.Т. Современный взгляд на патогенез варикоцеле и проблему развития его рецидивов. Урология. 2018;1;150–154). doi: 10.18565/urology.2018.1.150-154.
  15. Zhukov O.B., Ukolov V.A., Babushkina E.V., Evdokimov V.V. Recurrent varicocele and May-Thurner syndrome. Urology Herald. 2018;6(3):17–25. Russian (Жуков О.Б., Уколов В.А., Бабушкина Е.В., Евдокимов В.В. Рецидивирующее варикоцеле и синдром May-Thurner. Вестник урологии. 2018;6(3):17–25). https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2018-6-3-17-25
  16. Kapto A.A. May-Thurner syndrome and varicose veins of the pelvic organs in men. Andrology and Genital Surgery. 2018;19(4):28-38. Russian (Капто А.А. Синдроя Мея-Тернера и варикозная болезнь вен органов малого таза у мужчин. Андрология и гентиальная хирургия. 2018;19(4):28-38). https://doi.org/10.17650/2070-9781-2018-19-4-28-38
  17. Halpern J, Mittal S, Pereira K, Bhatia S, Ramasamy R. Percutaneous embolization of varicocele: technique, indications, relative contraindications, and complications. Asian J Androl. 2016;18(2):234-8. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.169985. PMID: 26658060; PMCID: PMC4770492.
  18. Rotker K, Sigman M. Recurrent varicocele. Asian J Androl. 2016;18(2):229-33. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.171578. PMID: 26806078; PMCID: PMC4770491.
  19. Çayan S, Orhan İ, Akbay E, Kadıoğlu A. Systematic review of treatment methods for recurrent varicoceles to compare post-treatment sperm parameters, pregnancy and complication rates. Andrologia. 2019;51(11):e13419. doi: 10.1111/and.13419
  20. Olefir Yu.V., Efremov E.A., Rodionov M.A., Zhivulko A.R., Popov D.M., Monakov D.M., Faniev M.V. Clinical significance of varicocelectomy: literature review. Andrology and Genital Surgery. 2023;24(2):49-57. Russian (Олефир Ю.В., Ефремов Е.А., Родионов М.А., Живулько А.Р., Попов Д.М., Монаков Д.М., Фаниев М.В. Клиническое значение варикоцелэктомии: обзор литературы. Андрология и генитальная хирургия. 2023;24(2):49-57). https://doi.org/10.17650/2070-9781-2023-24-2-49-57
  21. Gamidov S.I., Shatylko T.V., Bicoev T.B., Gasanov N.G., Mammaev R.U. Reproductive function in men with recurrent varicocele. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya 2020;4:176-181. Russian (Гамидов С.И., Шатылко Т.В., Бицоев Т.Б., Гасанов Н.Г., Маммаев Р.У. Репродуктивная функция у мужчин с рецидивами варикоцеле. Акушерство и гинекология. 2020;4:176-181). https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2020.4.176-181
  22. Baazeem A, Belzile E, Ciampi A, Dohle G, Jarvi K, Salonia A, Weidner W, Zini A. Varicocele and male factor infertility treatment: a new meta-analysis and review of the role of varicocele repair. Eur Urol. 2011;60(4):796-808. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.018.
  23. Marmar JL, Agarwal A, Prabakaran S, Agarwal R, Short RA, Benoff S, Thomas AJ Jr. Reassessing the value of varicocelectomy as a treatment for male subfertility with a new meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(3):639-48. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.12.008. Epub 2007 Apr 16. PMID: 17434508.
  24. Elzanaty S, Johansen CE. Microsurgical Varicocele Repair on Men with Grade III Lesions and Chronic Dull Scrotal Pain: A Pilot Study. Curr Urol. 2015;8(1):29-31. doi: 10.1159/000365685.
  25. Yaman O, Ozdiler E, Anafarta K, Göğüş O. Effect of microsurgical subinguinal varicocele ligation to treat pain. Urology. 2000;55(1):107-8. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00374-x. PMID: 10654904.
  26. Gamidov S.I., Druzhinina N.K., Shatylko T.V., Popova A.Yu., Safiullin R.I. Technical aspects of ultrasound diagnostics of varicocele and analysis of European clinical guidelines. Experimental and Clinical Urology. 2022;15(3)102-108; Russian (Гамидов С.И., Дружинина Н.К., Шатылко Т.В., Попова А.Ю., Сафиуллин Р.И. Технические аспекты ультразвуковой диагностики варикоцеле и анализ европейских клинических рекомендаций. Экспериментальная и клиническая Урология. 2022;15(3)102-108). https://doi.org/10.29188/2222-8543-2022-15-3-102-108)
  27. Kotov S.V., Korochkin N.D., Klimenko A.A. Recurrent varicocele. Urology Herald. 2021;9(2):132-141. Russian (Котов С.В., Корочкин Н.Д., Клименко А.А. Рецидивное варикоцеле. Вестник урологии. 2021;9(2):132-141). https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2021-9-2-132-141
  28. Punekar SV, Prem AR, Ridhorkar VR, Deshmukh HL, Kelkar AR. Post-surgical recurrent varicocele: efficacy of internal spermatic venography and steel-coil embolization. Br J Urol. 1996;77(1):124–28. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1996.82321.x. PMID: 8653282.
  29. Feneley M.R., Pal M.K., Nockler I.B., Hendry W.F. Retrograde embolization and causes of failure in the primary treatment of varicocele. Br J Urol. 1997;80(4):642–646. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.00407.x. PMID: 9352706.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Figure. Residual veins of the cluster plexus. The arrow shows the stump of the vein that was bandaged during the initial intervention

Download (126KB)

Copyright (c) 2024 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies