PROGNOSTIC FACTORS OF SATISFACTION WITH ERECTILE FUNCTION IN PEYRONIE’S DISEASE


Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат ақылы немесе тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

Objective: To determine the prognostic factors of satisfaction with erectile function in Peyronie’s disease. Materials and methods: 342 patients with Peyronie’s disease who underwent corporoplasty were analyzed. Mean age of patients at time of surgery was 42.4±15.6 years (range: 28-72 years). Median follow-up was 9.5 years (range: 0.5-20 years). Average preoperative penile curvature was 68±28, and mean stretched penile length was 12.4±3.1 cm. A logistic regression model was built to identify predictors of complete satisfaction with erectile function (EF). The analysis includes factors related to the patient, Peyronie’s disease, and the surgical method. The results are presented as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). A factor was considered to be a significant independent predictor of an outcome if p value < 0.05. Results: Among patients who were included in final analysis, only 285 (83.3%) were sexually active at long term. Among 285 sexually active patients, 139 (40.6%) were completely satisfied with EF, 84 (24.6%) were relatively satisfied, and 62 (18.1%) were dissatisfied. Median IIEF-EF score (+interquartile range) was 24+5. Seven patients (2%) only had rare sexual encounters and 50 patients (14.6%) had no sexual activity due to treatment for prostate cancer, severe refractory erectile dysfunction, or non-medical reasons. Preoperative IIEF score, tunica albuginea plication, and substitution corporoplasty with venous autograft or cadaveric pericardium allograft were significant predictors of complete satisfaction with EF outcome on regression analysis. No negative predictors were found according to the regression model. Conclusion: A high preoperative IIEF-EF score is a positive predictor of satisfaction with erectile function. Despite the high satisfaction rate after substitution corporoplasty and tunica albuginea plication, it is necessary to inform patients about the possible negative influence of concomitant factors and the risk of erectile dysfunction, regardless of the method of treatment.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

S. Gamidov

V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: safargamidov@yandex.ru
urologist, MD, Professor Moscow, Russia

A. Ustarkhanova

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

the 6th year student Moscow, Russia

T. Shatylko

V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: dialectic.law@gmail.com
urologist, Candidate of Medical Sciences Moscow, Russia

N. Hasanov

V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: natiqhasan@gmail.com
urologist Moscow, Russia

K. Li

V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: kostya_lee_1991@mail.ru
urologist Moscow, Russia

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Гамидов С.И., Попков В.М., Шатылко Т.В., Овчинников Р.И., Королёв А.Ю., Попова А.Ю., Гасанов Н.Г. Эректильная функция после корпоропластики по поводу болезни Пейрони. Урология. 2019;4:80- 84. Doi: https://dx.doi.Org/10.18565/urology.2019.4.80-84
  2. Малей М. Франсуа Пейрони - лейб-медик короля, заложивший фундамент будущего урологии. Медицинские аспекты здоровья мужчин. 2014;4(15):61-63.
  3. Peyronie D.L. Memoire sur quelques obstacles quis’opposent a l’ ejaculation naturelle de la semence. Memoires de l’ Acad Roy de Chir. 1743;425-434.
  4. Гамидов С.И., Попков В.М., Шатылко Т.В., Овчинников Р.И., Королев А.Ю., Попова А.Ю., Гасанов Н.Г. Отдаленные результаты корпоропластики при болезни Пейрони. Андрология и генитальная хирургия. 2018;19(4):39-45. https://doi.org/10.17650/2070-9781-2018-19-4-39-45
  5. Chung E., Clendinning E., Lessard L., Brock G. Five-year follow-up of Peyronie’s graft surgery: outcomes and patient satisfaction. J Sex Med. 2011;8(2):594-600. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02102.x.
  6. Hatzichristodoulou G., Osmonov D., Kühler H., Hellstrom W.J.G., Yafi F.A. Contemporary review of grafting techniques for the surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease. Sex Med Rev. 2017;5:544-552.
  7. Ziegelmann M.J., Farrell M.R., Levine L.A. Modern treatment strategies for penile prosthetics in Peyronie’s disease: a contemporary clinical review. Asian J Androl. 2020;22:51-59.
  8. Rice P.G., Somani B.K., Rees R.W. Twenty years of plaque incision and grafting for Peyronie’s disease: a review of literature. Sex Med. 2019;7:115-128.
  9. Chung E., Wang R., Ralph D., Levine L., Brock G. A worldwide survey on Peyronie’s disease surgical practice patterns among surgeons. J Sex Med. 2018;15:568-575.
  10. Askari M., Mohamad Mirjalili S.A., Bozorg M., Azizi R., Namiranian N. The prevalence of Peyronie’s disease in diabetic patients - 2018 - Yazd. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019;13:604-607.
  11. Satyanarayan A., Singla N., MoreyA.F. Penile ossification: a reconstructive challenge. Rev Urol. 2017;19:64-67.
  12. Gamidov S., Shatylko T., Gasanov N., Scherbakov D., Li K., Sukhikh G. Long-term outcomes of surgery for Peyronie’s disease: focus on patient satisfaction.Int J Impot Res. 2021;33(3):332-338. doi: 10.1038/s41443-020-0297-6.
  13. Baldini A., Morel-Journel N., Paparel P., Ruffion A., Terrier J.E. Patient-reported long-term sexual outcomes following plication surgery for penile curvature: a retrospective 58-patient study. Prog Urol. 2017;27:10-16.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML

© Bionika Media, 2022

Осы сайт cookie-файлдарды пайдаланады

Біздің сайтты пайдалануды жалғастыра отырып, сіз сайттың дұрыс жұмыс істеуін қамтамасыз ететін cookie файлдарын өңдеуге келісім бересіз.< / br>< / br>cookie файлдары туралы< / a>