Features of drainage of pyelocaliceal system in children after laparoscopic pyeloplasty


Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат ақылы немесе тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The study was aimed to improvement of results of treatment of children with congenital hydronephrosis due to reduction of invasiveness of operative approach and optimization of method of urine derivation in the postoperative period. From February 2008 to February 2012, 30 laparoscopic pyeloplasty were performed (16 boys, 14 girls, age from 2 months to 14 years, body weight 5500 g and more). Transabdominal pyeloplasty was performed by the Hynes-Anderson method. In 13 cases the ureteral stent deployment was performed, in 8 - pyelostoma was performed, nephrostomy performed earlier was maintained in 2 children, and in 7 children nephrostomy was performed by the proposed method. The mean duration of surgery was 110 (80-240) min. Results were followed for 3 to 53 months. 1 child on the 2nd day had falling pielostomy with the development of pyelonephritis, and 1 child had formation of urinoma. Both children had consistent anastomosis not required re-pyeloplasty. One child had persistent anastomotic stricture, which required re-pyeloplasty. Follow-up examinations included the ultrasound and intravenous urography. At the present moment, there are no complaints at all children, exacerbations of infections of the urinary system are not registered. Thus, laparoscopic pyeloplasty is an effective technique regardless of the age of the children, but it is necessary to further improve the drainage of the pelvicalyceal system in the postoperative period.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

I. Kagantsov

A. Minin

Email: lexa_minin@mail.ru

I. Sannikov

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Peters C.A., Schlüssel R.N., Retik A.B. Pediatric laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol. 1995; 153: 1962-1965.
  2. Inagaki T., Rha K.H., Ong A.M., Kavoussi L.R., Jarrett T.W. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: current status. BJU Int. 2005; 95: 102-105.
  3. Maynes L.J., Levin B.M., Webster T.M. et al. Measuring the true success of laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol. 2008; 22: 1193-1198.
  4. O’Reilly P.H., Brooman P.J., Mak S. et al. The longterm results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int. 2001; 87, 287-289.
  5. Moon D.A., El-Shazly M.A., Chang C.M. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Evolution of a new gold standard. Urology. 2006; 67(5): 932-936.
  6. Piaggio L.A., Franc-Guimond J., Noh P.H. et al. Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants and children: comparison with open surgery. J Urol. 2007; 178: 1579-1583.
  7. Singh H., Ganpule A., Malhotra V. Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. J Endourol. 2007; 21(12): 1461-1466.
  8. Szavay P.O., Luithle T., Fuchs J. Functional outcome after laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children. J Pediatric Urology. 2010; 6: 359-363.
  9. Каганцов И.М., Минин А.Е. Реконструктивно-пластические операции при гидронефрозе у детей с применением лапароскопического доступа - метод выбора в условиях современной хирургии. Детская хирургия. 2010; 5: 39-43.
  10. Коварский С.Л., Врублевский С.Г. Первый опыт лапароскопической пиелопластики у детей с гидронефрозом. Российский вестник детской хирургии, анестезиологии и реаниматологии. 2011; 2: 102-108.
  11. Metzelder M.L., Schier F., Petersen C. et al. Laparoscopic transabdominal pyeloplasty in children is feasible irrespective of age. J Urol 2006; 175: 688-691.
  12. Piaggio L.A., Franc-Guimond J., Noh P.H. et al. Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants and children: comparison with open surgery. J Urol. 2007; 178: 1579-1583.
  13. Szavay P.O., Luithle T., Fuchs J. Functional outcome after laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children. J Pediatric Urology. 2010; 6: 359-363.
  14. Miyaoka R., Monga Manoj. Ureteral stent discomfort: Etiology and management. Indian Journal of Urology. 2009; 6: 455-460.
  15. Smith K.E., Baskin L.S., Kogan B.A. Stented versus nonstented pediatric pyeloplasty: a modern series and review of the literature. J Urol. 2002; 168: 1127-1130.
  16. Anderson J.C., Hynes W. Retrocaval ureter: A case diagnosed preoperatively and treated successfully by a plastic operation. Br J Urol. 1949; 21: 209.
  17. Zaidi Z., Mouriquand P.D.E. The use of multipurpose stent in children. Br. J Urol. 1997; 80: 802-805.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML

© Bionika Media, 2013

Осы сайт cookie-файлдарды пайдаланады

Біздің сайтты пайдалануды жалғастыра отырып, сіз сайттың дұрыс жұмыс істеуін қамтамасыз ететін cookie файлдарын өңдеуге келісім бересіз.< / br>< / br>cookie файлдары туралы< / a>