Comparative analysis of results of radical nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy for clinically localized renal cell carcinoma in patients with normal functioning contralateral kidney
- Авторлар: Volkova M.I1, Skvortsov I.Y.1, Klimov A.V1, Chernyaev V.A1, Kalinin S.A1, Peters M.V1, Matveev V.B1
-
Мекемелер:
- FSBI “RORC n.a. N.N. Blokhin RAMS”
- Шығарылым: № 4 (2014)
- Беттер: 47-55
- Бөлім: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/1728-2985/article/view/280242
- ID: 280242
Дәйексөз келтіру
Аннотация
Толық мәтін
Авторлар туралы
M. Volkova
FSBI “RORC n.a. N.N. Blokhin RAMS”
Email: mivolkova@rambler.ru
Senior Scientist at the Department of Urology
I. Skvortsov
FSBI “RORC n.a. N.N. Blokhin RAMS”
A. Klimov
FSBI “RORC n.a. N.N. Blokhin RAMS”
V. Chernyaev
FSBI “RORC n.a. N.N. Blokhin RAMS”
S. Kalinin
FSBI “RORC n.a. N.N. Blokhin RAMS”
M. Peters
FSBI “RORC n.a. N.N. Blokhin RAMS”
V. Matveev
FSBI “RORC n.a. N.N. Blokhin RAMS”
Әдебиет тізімі
- Campbell S.C., Novick A.C., Belldegrun A. et al. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol. 2009; 182: 1271.
- Ljungberg B., Cowan N.C., Hanbury D.C. et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update. Eur. Urol. 2010; 58: 398.
- Motzer R.J., Agarwal N., Beard C. et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: kidney сancer. J Natl. Cancer Netw. 2009; 7: 618.
- Huang W.C., Elkin E.B., Levey A.S. et al. Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in patients with small renal tumors - is there a difference in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes? J Urol. 2009; 181: 55.
- Miller D.C., Schonlau M., Litwin M.S. et al. Urologic Diseases in America Project. Renal and cardiovascular morbidity after partial or radical nephrectomy. Cancer. 2008; 112(3): 511-520.
- Thompson R.H., Siddiqui S., Lohse C.M. et al. Partial versus radical nephrectomy for 4 to 7 cm renal cortical tumors. J Urol. 2009; 182: 2601.
- Weight C.J., Lieser G., Larson B.T. et al. Partial nephrectomy is associated with improved overall survival compared to radical nephrectomy in patients with unanticipated benign renal tumours. Eur. Urol. 2010; 58: 293-298.
- Van Poppel H., Da Pozzo L., Albrecht W. et al. A prospective, randomised EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2011; 59: 543-552.
- KDOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 39: S1-266.
- Bellomo R., Ronco C., Kellum J.A. et al. Acute renal failure -definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care. 2004; 8(4): R204-212.
- Lowrance W.T., Yee D.S., Savage C. et al. Complications after radical and partial nephrectomy as a function of age. J Urol. 2010; 183(5): 1725-1730.
- Corman J.M., Penson D.F., Hur K. et al. Comparison of complications after radical and partial nephrectomy: results from the National Veterans Administration Surgical Quality Improvement Program. BJU Int. 2000; 86(7): 782-789.
- Van Poppel H., Da Pozzo L., Albrecht W. et al. A prospective randomized EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the complications of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur. Urol. 2007; 51: 1606-1615.
- Kim Simon P., Thompson R.H., Boorjian S.A. et al. Comparative Effectiveness for Survival and Renal Function of Partial and Radical Nephrectomy for Localized Renal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Urol. 2012; 188: 51-57.
- Shlipak M.G., Smith G.L., Rathore S.S. et al. Renal function, digoxin therapy, and heart failure outcomes: Evidence from the digoxin intervention group trial. J Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2004; 15: 2195-2203.
- Knight S., Johns E.J. Renal functional responses to ischaemia-reperfusion injury in normotensive and hypertensive rats following non-selective and selective cyclo-oxygenase inhibition with nitric oxide donation. Clin. Exper. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2008; 35(1): 11-16.
- Brenner B.M. Nephron adaptation to renal injury of ablation. Am. J Physiol. 1985; 249: 324-337.
- Indudhara R., Bueschen A.J., Urban D.A. et al. Nephron-sparing surgery compared with radical nephrectomy for renal tumors: current indications and results. South Med J 1997; 90: 982.
- McKiernan J., Simmons R., Katz J., Russo P. Natural history of chronic renal insufficiency after partial and radical nephrectomy. Urology 2002; 59: 816-820.
- Lau W.K., Blute M.L., Weaver A.L. et al. Matched comparison of radical nephrectomy vs nephron sparing surgery in patients with unilateral renal cell carcinoma and a normal contralateral kidney. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2000; 75: 1236-1242.
- Clark P.E., Schover L.R., Uzzo R.G. et al. Quality of life and psychological adaptation after surgical treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma: impact of the amount of remaining renal tissue. Urology. 2001; 57: 252-256.
- Poulakis V., Witzsch U., De Vries R. et al. Quality of life after surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: comparison between radical nephrectomy and nephron sparing surgery. Urology. 2003; 62: 814-820.
- Shinohara N., Harabayashi T., Sato S. et al. Impact of nephronsparing surgery on quality of life in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma. Eur. Urol. 2001; 39: 114-119.
- Ficarra V., Novella G., Sarti A. et al. Psycho-social well-being and general health status after surgical treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2002-2003; 34: 441-446.