The questionnaire of integrated assessment of male sexuality is a tool for analyzing a man's sexual functions throughout his life

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат ақылы немесе тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

Introduction. Sexual dysfunction is extremely common in the world. The frequency of erectile dysfunction can approach 50%, while ejaculation disorders more than 30%. The patient’s sexual well-being is an integral part of general health and can correlate with the risk of developing diseases of organs and systems. Currently, the most common assessment of individual aspects of sexuality at the time of the inspection by clinical interview is, however, the issue of determining all the components of the sexual function throughout the life of the patient is acutely. To solve this problem, M.I. Kogan was developed and published in 2009 an Integral assessment of male sexuality (IAMS).

Aim. To determine the validity and reliability of the questionnaire of sexual functioning of men.

Materials and methods. The study consists of 209 men. Of these, 43 healthy people aged 31.0 [26; 36] years; 57 people aged 63.0 years [59.0; 67.0] with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH); and 109 people aged 64.0 years [61.0; 68.0] with verified prostate cancer (PCa).

Age in healthy men ranged from 18 to 52 years, while men with BPH it was 49–71 and in those with PCa 47-70 years. In the whole cohort, 78.0% were married, 13.9% were divorced, but had sexual relations out of marriage, and 8.1% were lonely. 136 men (65.0%) had children. All men filled in IAMS.

Results. The Alpha Kronbach coefficient exceeded 0.6 for all three versions of the questionnaire and groups of men, while for all examined, as well as patients, exceeded 0.9. The highest values were obtained for a group of patients, as well as for all examined, which confirms the reliability of the questionnaire. Lower values for healthy persons can be explained by a small number. All correlation coefficients were positive and significant at a high level (p<0.001), which indicates that the increase in the sum of points for each component means an increase in the level of male sexuality and confirms the validity of the questionnaire. The level of sexuality of patients was much lower compared to healthy men (p<0.001). Among healthy people, the majority had a normal level of sexuality (62.8%), while 23.3% were hyposexual and 14% were hypersexual. In the group of patients, hyposexuality was prevalent (74.1%), while normal sexuality was seen only in 18.7%, and hypersexuality in 7.2%. Thus, the results of all calculations confirm the validity and reliability of this questionnaire. IAMS not only gives an integral assessment of a man’s sexuality at the time of contacting a urologist, but also quantitatively determines the type of sexuality, which is a reflection of the innate qualities of the male body throughout his sexual life.

Conclusions. IAMS is valid and reproducible questionnaire for an integral assessment of male sexuality, which is possible to use in epidemiological and clinical studies in the future.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

Mikhail Kogan

FGBOU VO Rostov State Medical University Ministry of Health of Russian Federation

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: dept_kogan@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1710-0169

Ph.D., MD, professor, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation; Head of the Department of Urology and Human Reproductive Health (with a course of pediatric urology and andrology)

Ресей, Rostov-on-Don

Mikhail Efremov

FGBOU VO Kuban State Medical University of Minzdrav of Russia; GBUZ Scientific and Research Institute of Regional Clinical Hospital №1 named after prof. S.V. Ochapovsky

Email: efremov.uro@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2733-0619

Ph.D., assistant at the Department, urologist

Ресей, Krasnodar; Krasnodar

Vladimir Medvedev

FGBOU VO Kuban State Medical University of Minzdrav of Russia; GBUZ Scientific and Research Institute of Regional Clinical Hospital №1 named after prof. S.V. Ochapovsky

Email: medvedev_vl@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8335-2578

Ph.D., MD, professor; Head of the Department of Urology, Deputy Chief on Urology and Chief of the Uronephrologic center

 

Ресей, Krasnodar; Krasnodar

Anatoly Anosov

FGBOU VO Kuban State Medical University of Minzdrav of Russia; GBUZ Scientific and Research Institute of Regional Clinical Hospital №1 named after prof. S.V. Ochapovsky

Email: vester.orient@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-2126-3136

Ph.D. student, urologist

Ресей, Krasnodar; Krasnodar

Zalimkhan Akhokhov

FGBOU VO Kuban State Medical University of Minzdrav of Russia; GBUZ Scientific and Research Institute of Regional Clinical Hospital №1 named after prof. S.V. Ochapovsky

Email: zalimkhan@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0434-564X

Ph.D., assistant at the Department of Urology and Human Reproductive Health (with a course of pediatric urology and andrology)

Ресей, Krasnodar; Krasnodar

Tatyana Sinyavskaya

Rostov State University of Economics (RINH)

Email: sin-ta@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4120-9180

Ph.D. in economic sciences, associate professor at the Department of Statistics, Econometrics and Risk Assessment

Ресей, Rostov-on-Don

Igor Khmaruk

Neurolex LLC

Email: ihmaruk@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1663-7623

Ph.D., associate professor at the Department psychiatry and narcology, psychologist

Ресей, Rostov-on-Don

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Eardley I. The incidence, prevalence, and natural history of erectile dysfunction. Sex.Med.Rev. 2013;1:3–16.
  2. Lewis R.W., Fugl-Meyer K.S., Corona G., Hayes R.D., Laumann E.O., et al. ORIGINAL ARTICLES: Definitions/Epidemiology/Risk Factors for Sexual Dysfunction. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2010;7(4-2):1598–1607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01778.x
  3. Clinical uroandrology. Edited by Vincenzo Mirono; translated from English. edited by M.E. Chaly. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2019. p. 162. Russian (Клиническая уроандрология. Под ред. Винченцо Мироне; пер. с англ. под ред. М.Е. Чалого. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2019. С. 162).
  4. Feldman H.A. et al. Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Urol. 1994;151:54. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8254833
  5. Braun M. et al. Epidemiology of erectile dysfunction: results of the ‘Cologne Male Survey’. Int J Impot Res, 2000;12:305. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11416833
  6. Laumann E.O. et al. Sexual dysfunction in the United States: prevalence and predictors. JAMA. 1999;281:537. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10022110
  7. Davey Smith G., Frankel S., Yarnell J. Sex and death: are they related? Findings from the Caerphilly cohort study. BMJ. 1997;315:1641–1644.
  8. Salonia A. et al. Is erectile dysfunction a reliable proxy of general male health status? The case for the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain. J Sex Med. 2012;9:2708. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22897643
  9. Besiroglu H. et al. The relationship between metabolic syndrome, its components, and erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and a meta-analysis of observational studies. The journal of sexual medicine. 2015;12:1309. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25872648
  10. Hui Meng Tan, Seng Fah Tong, Christopher C.K. Ho, Men’s Health: Sexual Dysfunction, Physical, and Psychological Health—Is There a Link? The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2012;9(3):663–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02582.x
  11. Thang S Han, Abdelouahid Tajar, Terence W O’Neill, Min Jiang, György Bartfai, Steven Boonen, Felipe Casanueva, Joseph D Finn, Gianni Forti, Aleksander Giwercman, Ilpo T Huhtaniemi, Krzysztof Kula, Neil Pendleton, Margus Punab, Alan J Silman, Dirk Vanderschueren, Michael E J Lean, Frederick C W Wu, the EMAS group, Impaired quality of life and sexual function in overweight and obese men: the European Male Ageing Study. European Journal of Endocrinology. 2011;164(6):1003–1011. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-10-1129
  12. Gratzke C. et al. Anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2010;7:445. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20092448
  13. Kogan M.I., Kireev A.Yu. The questionnaire of integral assessment of male sexuality. Urology. 2009;1:46–50. Russian (Коган М.И., Киреев А.Ю. Анкета интегральной оценки мужской сексуальности. Урология. 2009;1:46–50).
  14. Sexopathology Handbook / [Vol. Agarkov. Family. not others]; Boilers and ground rents. G. S. Vasilchenko. Moscow: Medicine, 1990. 574, [1] p. : ill. : p. 21.; 5-225-01179-9 ISBN (In translation). Russian (Сексопатология Справочник / [Агаркова Т. Е. и др.]; Под ред. Г.С. Васильченко. Москва: Медицина, 1990. 574, [1] с. : ил. : 21 см.; ISBN 5-225-01179-9 (В пер.)).
  15. Rosen R., Brown C., Heiman J., Leiblum S., Meston C., Shabsigh R., Ferguson D., D’Agostino R. Jr. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000 Apr-Jun;26(2):191-208. doi: 10.1080/009262300278597.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. The criterion of "rocky scree"

Жүктеу (1MB)
3. Fig. 2. Diagram of the range of male sexuality based on the results of two measurements, points

Жүктеу (2MB)

© Bionika Media, 2025