TREATMENT AND METAPHYLAXIS OF GOUT COMPLICATED BY NEPHROPATHY AND UROLITHIASIS


Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

The evaluation of clinical efficacy of combined treatment and metaphylaxis in 58 patients with gout complicated by nephropathy and urolithiasis was performed. The study included 41 (71%) men and 27 (29%) women aged 44 to 88 years (mean age - 58 ± 7 years). All patients received parenteral therapy with trometamol H, 5 -10 infusion for the course, an average of 7 infusions. For the metaphylaxis, all patients received biologically active supplement urisan 2 tablets 2 times a day during next three months against the background of drug therapy. Findings indicate a high clinical efficacy of the trometamol H in the combined treatment of patients with gout, complicated by nephropathy and urolithiasis, considering that improvement of renal function, microcirculation in the renal parenchyma, increased glomerular filtration rate, normalization of nitrogenous wastes levels, partial or complete dissolution of concretions of the kidneys, a significant decrease in the tophs size, an increase in motor activity were observed, which ultimately improves the quality of life for these patients. Metaphylaxis using urisan for 3 months on a background of traditional therapy contributed to a stable normalization of blood uric acid levels, which prevented the exacerbation of underlying disease and recurrent stone formation. These data allow to recommend reducing the dose of traditional anti-gout drugs and conducting repeated course of metaphylaxis with the urisan after 5-6 months during 3 months.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Bibliografia

  1. Мухин Н. А., Балкаров И. М., Лебедева М. В. и др. Уратная нефропатия — от “бессимптомной” гиперурикозурии до хронического гемодиализа. Нефрология. 1997; 3:7-10.
  2. Harris C., Lloyd D., Lewis J. The prevalence and prophylaxis of gout in England. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1995; 48(9):1153-1158.
  3. Лебедева М. В. Ранняя диагностика уратного поражения почек. Авт. дисс. канд. 1998.
  4. Николаев А. Ю., Милованов Ю. С. Нарушения пуринового обмена и подагрическая нефропатия. Лечащий врач. 2006; 10:54-57.
  5. Мухин Н. А., Фомин В. В., Моисеев С. В. Снижение скорости клубочковой фильтрации и сердечно-сосудистый риск. Клиническая фармакология и терапия. 2009;18(5):52-56.
  6. Балкаров И. М. Терапевтические аспекты уратной нефропатии. Практикующий врач: Прилож. к Медикал маркет. 1996;4(2):14-17.
  7. Братчиков О. И., Крюкова А. Я., Топорков А. С. и др. Инновации в питании при наиболее распространенных заболеваниях обмена веществ. Диетология. 2011:40-41.
  8. Авдошин В. П., Андрюхин М. И., Анненков А. В. и др. Клиническая эффективность Трометамола Н в комплексной терапии больных подагрой, осложненной нефропатией. Клин. фармакология и терапия. 2011;1:26-29.
  9. WorldHealth Organization monographs on selected medicinal plants. Vol. 2. Geneva. WorldHealth Organization, 2002. 357 с.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Declaração de direitos autorais © Bionika Media, 2012

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies